Babysitter war-game-orchestrator
Business war game orchestration skill for competitive response simulation and strategic testing
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/library/specializations/domains/business/decision-intelligence/skills/war-game-orchestrator" ~/.claude/skills/a5c-ai-babysitter-war-game-orchestrator && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
library/specializations/domains/business/decision-intelligence/skills/war-game-orchestrator/SKILL.mdsource content
War Game Orchestrator
Overview
The War Game Orchestrator skill provides capabilities for designing, facilitating, and analyzing business war games. It enables organizations to stress-test strategies, anticipate competitive responses, and develop more robust strategic plans through simulated competitive interactions.
Capabilities
- Team role assignment
- Scenario briefing generation
- Move and countermove tracking
- Timeline management
- Debrief facilitation
- Insight extraction
- Documentation and replay
- Learning synthesis
Used By Processes
- War Gaming and Competitive Response Modeling
- Strategic Scenario Development
- Competitive Battlecard Development
Usage
War Game Design
# Configure war game war_game_config = { "name": "Market Entry Defense", "objective": "Test our response strategy to potential competitor entry", "scenario": { "context": "New competitor preparing to enter our core market with disruptive pricing", "time_frame": "Next 18 months simulated in 3 rounds", "market_conditions": "Moderate growth, price-sensitive customers" }, "teams": [ { "name": "Home Team", "role": "Our Company", "objective": "Defend market share while maintaining profitability", "participants": ["CEO", "VP Sales", "VP Product", "CFO"], "resources": {"budget": 10000000, "constraints": ["No price below cost"]} }, { "name": "Red Team", "role": "New Entrant", "objective": "Capture 15% market share within 18 months", "participants": ["Strategy Consultant", "Former Competitor Exec", "Market Analyst"], "resources": {"budget": 50000000, "constraints": ["Must achieve profitability by Year 3"]} }, { "name": "Market Team", "role": "Customers and Market", "objective": "Respond realistically to team moves", "participants": ["Customer Advisory Board Rep", "Industry Analyst"] } ], "rounds": [ {"name": "Round 1", "time_period": "Months 1-6", "focus": "Initial moves"}, {"name": "Round 2", "time_period": "Months 7-12", "focus": "Response and counter-response"}, {"name": "Round 3", "time_period": "Months 13-18", "focus": "Sustained competition"} ], "duration": "Full day (8 hours)" }
Team Briefings
# Generate team briefing home_team_briefing = { "team": "Home Team", "your_role": "You are the leadership team of Incumbent Corp", "your_position": { "market_share": 0.45, "revenue": 200000000, "profit_margin": 0.25, "customer_base": 500, "brand_strength": "Strong, but seen as expensive", "product_portfolio": ["Enterprise Suite", "SMB Lite", "Professional"] }, "intelligence_on_competitor": { "known": ["Well-funded startup", "Hiring aggressively", "Cloud-native technology"], "rumored": ["Targeting enterprise segment", "Freemium model consideration"], "unknown": ["Launch timing", "Initial pricing", "Channel strategy"] }, "your_objective": "Maintain at least 40% market share while keeping margin above 20%", "available_moves": [ "Pricing changes", "New product launch", "Marketing campaigns", "Partnership announcements", "Acquisition offers", "Contract incentives" ], "constraints": [ "Board has approved up to $10M defensive spending", "Cannot reduce prices below 15% margin", "Must maintain service levels" ] }
Move Tracking
# Track moves and outcomes game_log = { "round": 1, "moves": [ { "sequence": 1, "team": "Red Team", "move": { "type": "Product Launch", "details": "Launch cloud-native enterprise product at 30% below incumbent pricing", "investment": 5000000, "target_segment": "Mid-market enterprises" }, "rationale": "Establish beachhead in price-sensitive segment" }, { "sequence": 2, "team": "Market Team", "response": { "customer_reaction": "High interest, 15% of prospects request demos", "market_shift": "Price expectations decrease 10%", "media_coverage": "Positive coverage of new entrant" } }, { "sequence": 3, "team": "Home Team", "move": { "type": "Defensive Bundle", "details": "Launch loyalty program with 20% discount for 3-year commitments", "investment": 3000000, "target_segment": "Existing customers in target segment" }, "rationale": "Lock in existing customers before they evaluate competitor" } ], "round_outcomes": { "home_team_market_share": 0.43, "red_team_market_share": 0.05, "home_team_margin": 0.23, "key_events": ["Three major accounts considering switch", "One partnership announced"] } }
Debrief and Insights
# Debrief structure debrief = { "game_summary": { "final_market_shares": {"Home Team": 0.38, "Red Team": 0.12, "Others": 0.50}, "home_team_margin": 0.18, "home_team_result": "Objective partially met (share < 40%, margin close to target)" }, "key_insights": [ { "insight": "Speed of response critical - 6-month delay in Round 1 response cost 3% share", "evidence": "Comparison of Round 1 vs Round 2 response effectiveness", "implication": "Pre-plan defensive moves before competitor launches" }, { "insight": "Existing customer retention more cost-effective than winning competitive deals", "evidence": "Cost per retained customer vs cost per competitive win", "implication": "Prioritize retention program investment" }, { "insight": "Product innovation narrative more effective than pure price response", "evidence": "Market Team feedback on customer decision factors", "implication": "Lead with value, not price in competitive messaging" } ], "strategic_recommendations": [ "Develop pre-approved response playbook for competitor entry scenarios", "Accelerate cloud-native product roadmap", "Strengthen customer success program for at-risk accounts", "Establish competitive intelligence monitoring system" ], "follow_up_actions": [ {"action": "Develop response playbook", "owner": "Strategy", "due": "30 days"}, {"action": "Customer retention program design", "owner": "Customer Success", "due": "45 days"} ] }
Input Schema
{ "operation": "design|brief|track|debrief|report", "war_game_config": { "name": "string", "objective": "string", "scenario": "object", "teams": ["object"], "rounds": ["object"] }, "game_log": { "round": "number", "moves": ["object"], "outcomes": "object" }, "debrief": "object" }
Output Schema
{ "briefings": { "team_name": "string (markdown)" }, "game_state": { "current_round": "number", "market_positions": "object", "pending_moves": ["object"] }, "debrief_report": { "summary": "string", "insights": ["object"], "recommendations": ["string"], "actions": ["object"] }, "full_documentation": "string (markdown)" }
War Game Formats
| Format | Duration | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Tabletop | 2-4 hours | Quick strategy testing |
| Full Day | 6-8 hours | Comprehensive competitive simulation |
| Multi-Day | 2-3 days | Complex market dynamics |
| Digital | Async | Distributed teams, extended scenarios |
Best Practices
- Assign Red Team to people who can think like competitors
- Include Market Team for realistic customer responses
- Provide sufficient intelligence to make informed moves
- Enforce time limits to simulate real-world pressure
- Capture all moves and rationale for learning
- Focus debrief on insights, not winning/losing
- Convert insights to actionable recommendations
Integration Points
- Receives scenarios from Scenario Narrative Generator
- Connects with Competitive Intelligence Tracker for background
- Supports War Game Facilitator agent
- Integrates with Decision Journal for learning capture