git clone https://github.com/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/architect" ~/.claude/skills/ai-analyst-lab-ai-analyst-architect && rm -rf "$T"
.claude/skills/architect/skill.mdSkill: /architect
Run the multi-persona planning methodology to produce a master plan for a new project or feature.
Parameters
- brief (required): What are we building? Can be a sentence, a paragraph, or "read [file]" to pull from an existing doc.
- --personas (optional): Override persona count. Default: 5.
- --skip-debate (optional): Skip Phase 2 debate and go straight to synthesis. Faster but lower quality.
- --output-dir (optional): Where to write plans. Default: auto-detect from project context.
Trigger Phrases
/architect Build a centered-person thumbnail template/architect "Add YouTube upload to the podcast pipeline"/architect read evals-course/BUILD_PLAN.mdarchitect a new email drip sequence for cohort 4
Methodology
This skill implements
shared/PLANNING_METHODOLOGY.md. The full workflow:
Phase 0 Scope & Persona Selection → define brief, pick 3-5 expert personas Phase 1 Independent Plans (Round 1) → all personas plan in parallel Phase 2 Debate & Critique → single moderator resolves conflicts Phase 3 Revised Plans (Round 2) → personas revise in parallel Phase 4 Alignment & Synthesis → single architect produces master plan Phase 5 Build Status Tracker → CREATE BUILD_STATUS.yaml
Execution
1. Parse the brief
If the user provided a file path or "read [file]", read that file as the project brief. Otherwise, use the text they provided directly.
If the brief is too vague (under 20 words, no clear deliverable), ask one clarifying question before proceeding.
2. Determine output directory
Look for context clues:
- If the brief mentions a specific project (podcast, analytics, evals, etc.), use that project's directory
- If a
directory already exists nearby, use itworking/plans/ - Otherwise, create
in the most relevant project directoryworking/plans/ - If truly ambiguous, ask the user
Set:
:PLANS_DIR{project}/working/plans/
:MASTER_PLAN_PATH
(or{project}/MASTER_PLAN.md
){PROJECT_NAME}_MASTER_PLAN.md
3. Phase 0: Scope & Persona Selection
Read
shared/PLANNING_METHODOLOGY.md for the full methodology reference.
Based on the brief, select 3-5 personas. Use the archetype table from the methodology as a starting point, but customize roles to the specific project. For example:
- A thumbnail project might need: CTR Optimizer, Frontend Renderer, Brand Compositor, Pipeline Architect
- A course project might need: Curriculum Designer, Student Advocate, Technical Author, Platform Specialist
Present the personas to the user:
Project: [brief summary] Output: {MASTER_PLAN_PATH} Personas: 1. [Name] — [Role]. Cares about: [focus]. Will challenge: [what]. 2. ... Proceed with these personas? (a) Yes (b) Swap one out (c) Add/remove
Wait for approval before launching Phase 1.
4. Phase 1: Independent Plans (Round 1)
Launch all persona agents in parallel using the Task tool. Each persona gets:
- The project brief
- Their role description and perspective
- Any reference files or examples mentioned in the brief
- Instructions to write their plan to
{PLANS_DIR}/round1/{persona-slug}.md
Each persona produces:
- What needs to be built (their domain)
- How it should be structured
- Phases/waves
- Dependencies on other domains
- Risks and unknowns
- What they'd push back on
Wait for all personas to complete.
5. Phase 2: Debate & Critique
If
--skip-debate: skip to Phase 4.
Launch a single debate agent that receives all Round 1 plans. It identifies:
- Agreements (2+ personas align)
- Conflicts (incompatible approaches)
- Gaps (nobody addressed)
- Resolutions with reasoning
Output:
{PLANS_DIR}/debate-summary.md
6. Phase 3: Revised Plans (Round 2)
Launch all persona agents again in parallel. Each receives:
- Their Round 1 plan
- The debate summary
- Instructions to revise and write to
{PLANS_DIR}/round2/{persona-slug}.md
7. Phase 4: Synthesis
Launch a single synthesis agent that receives all Round 2 plans + debate summary.
Produces the master plan with sections:
- Executive Summary
- Wave Structure (summary table)
- Detailed Waves (task specs with IDs, files, deps)
- Dependency Graph
- Files Changed Summary
- Open Questions
Output:
{MASTER_PLAN_PATH}
8. Phase 5: Build Status Tracker
After user approves the master plan, generate
BUILD_STATUS.yaml following the schema in shared/PLANNING_METHODOLOGY.md.
9. Report
=== PLANNING COMPLETE === Master Plan: {MASTER_PLAN_PATH} Build Tracker: {project}/BUILD_STATUS.yaml Persona Plans: {PLANS_DIR}/round1/ (5 files) Revised Plans: {PLANS_DIR}/round2/ (5 files) Debate Summary: {PLANS_DIR}/debate-summary.md Waves: [N] Tasks: [N] Ready to execute: "produce wave 0" or read the master plan first
Shortcuts
: Use 3 personas, skip debate (Phases 0-1-4 only). Faster for smaller projects./architect --quick [brief]
: Re-read existing plans in/architect --resume
and pick up where we left off.working/plans/