MetaClaw source-evaluation
Use this skill when presenting information from external sources, citing research, or answering factual questions. Assess source credibility and recency before relying on it.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/aiming-lab/MetaClaw
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/aiming-lab/MetaClaw "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/memory_data/skills/source-evaluation" ~/.claude/skills/aiming-lab-metaclaw-source-evaluation && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
memory_data/skills/source-evaluation/SKILL.mdsource content
Source Evaluation
CRAAP criteria (quick version):
- Currency: Is the source recent enough for this topic? (Technology: < 2 years; science: check if superseded)
- Relevance: Does it directly address the question?
- Authority: Is the author or organization credible in this domain?
- Accuracy: Is it peer-reviewed, cited, or verifiable from other sources?
- Purpose: Is it informational vs. promotional vs. opinion?
Red flags: anonymous authorship, no citations, sensational language, single-source claims.
Best practice: triangulate important facts across 2–3 independent sources before asserting them.