Medical-research-skills phylogenetic-tree-styler

Analyze data with `phylogenetic-tree-styler` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/scientific-skills/Data Analysis/phylogenetic-tree-styler" ~/.claude/skills/aipoch-medical-research-skills-phylogenetic-tree-styler && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: scientific-skills/Data Analysis/phylogenetic-tree-styler/SKILL.md
source content

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Phylogenetic Tree Styler

When to Use

  • Use this skill when the task needs Beautify phylogenetic trees with taxonomy color blocks, bootstrap values.
  • Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
  • Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

Key Features

See

## Features
above for related details.

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyze data with
    phylogenetic-tree-styler
    using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.
  • Packaged executable path(s):
    scripts/main.py
    .
  • Reference material available in
    references/
    for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python 3.8+
  • ete3
  • matplotlib
  • numpy
  • pandas

Install dependencies:

pip install ete3 matplotlib numpy pandas

Example Usage

See

## Usage
above for related details.

cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/phylogenetic-tree-styler"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file
    CONFIG
    block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run
    python scripts/main.py
    with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See

## Workflow
above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface:
    scripts/main.py
    .
  • Reference guidance:
    references/
    contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py

Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py

# Example invocation: python scripts/main.py --help

# Example invocation: python scripts/main.py --input "Audit validation sample with explicit symptoms, history, assessment, and next-step plan." --format json

Workflow

  1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
  2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
  3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
  4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
  5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

Features

Beautify phylogenetic trees, add taxonomy color blocks, Bootstrap values, and timelines.

Usage

python3 scripts/main.py --input <input_tree.nwk> --output <output.png> [options]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionDefault
-i
,
--input
Input Newick format phylogenetic tree fileRequired
-o
,
--output
Output image file pathtree_styled.png
-f
,
--format
Output format: png, pdf, svgpng
-w
,
--width
Image width (pixels)1200
-h
,
--height
Image height (pixels)800
--show-bootstrap
Show Bootstrap valuesFalse
--bootstrap-threshold
Only show Bootstrap values above this threshold50
--taxonomy-file
Species taxonomy information file (CSV format: name,domain,phylum,class,order,family,genus)None
--show-timeline
Show timelineFalse
--root-age
Root node age (million years ago)None
--branch-color
Branch colorblack
--leaf-color
Leaf node label colorblack

Examples

Basic Beautification

python3 scripts/main.py -i tree.nwk -o tree_basic.png

Show Bootstrap Values

python3 scripts/main.py -i tree.nwk -o tree_bootstrap.png --show-bootstrap --bootstrap-threshold 70

Add Taxonomy Color Blocks

python3 scripts/main.py -i tree.nwk -o tree_taxonomy.png --taxonomy-file taxonomy.csv

Add Timeline

python3 scripts/main.py -i tree.nwk -o tree_timeline.png --show-timeline --root-age 500

Comprehensive Usage

python3 scripts/main.py -i tree.nwk -o tree_full.png \
    --show-bootstrap --bootstrap-threshold 70 \
    --taxonomy-file taxonomy.csv \
    --show-timeline --root-age 500

Taxonomy Information File Format

taxonomy.csv example:

name,domain,phylum,class
Species_A,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria
Species_B,Bacteria,Firmicutes,Bacilli
Species_C,Archaea,Euryarchaeota,Methanobacteria

Input Format

Supports standard Newick format (.nwk or .newick):

((A:0.1,B:0.2)95:0.3,(C:0.4,D:0.5)88:0.6);

Bootstrap values can be placed at node label positions (like the 95, 88 above).

Risk Assessment

Risk IndicatorAssessmentLevel
Code ExecutionPython/R scripts executed locallyMedium
Network AccessNo external API callsLow
File System AccessRead input files, write output filesMedium
Instruction TamperingStandard prompt guidelinesLow
Data ExposureOutput files saved to workspaceLow

Security Checklist

  • No hardcoded credentials or API keys
  • No unauthorized file system access (../)
  • Output does not expose sensitive information
  • Prompt injection protections in place
  • Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
  • Output directory restricted to workspace
  • Script execution in sandboxed environment
  • Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
  • Dependencies audited

Prerequisites

No additional Python packages required.

Evaluation Criteria

Success Metrics

  • Successfully executes main functionality
  • Output meets quality standards
  • Handles edge cases gracefully
  • Performance is acceptable

Test Cases

  1. Basic Functionality: Standard input → Expected output
  2. Edge Case: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
  3. Performance: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

Lifecycle Status

  • Current Stage: Draft
  • Next Review Date: 2026-03-06
  • Known Issues: None
  • Planned Improvements:
    • Performance optimization
    • Additional feature support

Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

  • Objective or requested deliverable
  • Inputs used and assumptions introduced
  • Workflow or decision path
  • Core result, recommendation, or artifact
  • Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
  • Unresolved items and next-step checks

Error Handling

  • If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
  • If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
  • If
    scripts/main.py
    fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
  • Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of

phylogenetic-tree-styler
and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

phylogenetic-tree-styler
only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

  1. Objective
  2. Inputs Received
  3. Assumptions
  4. Workflow
  5. Deliverable
  6. Risks and Limits
  7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.

Inputs to Collect

  • Required inputs: the user goal, the primary data or source file, and the requested output format.
  • Optional inputs: output directory, formatting preferences, and validation constraints.
  • If a required input is unavailable, return a short clarification request before continuing.

Output Contract

  • Return a short summary, the main deliverables, and any assumptions that materially affect interpretation.
  • If execution is partial, label what succeeded, what failed, and the next safe recovery step.
  • Keep the final answer within the documented scope of the skill.

Validation and Safety Rules

  • Validate identifiers, file paths, and user-provided parameters before execution.
  • Do not fabricate results, metrics, citations, or downstream conclusions.
  • Use safe fallback behavior when dependencies, credentials, or required inputs are missing.
  • Surface any execution failure with a concise diagnosis and recovery path.