Marketplace flow-debugging
4-phase systematic debugging for flow-fix. NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/aiskillstore/marketplace
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/aiskillstore/marketplace "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/dimon94/flow-debugging" ~/.claude/skills/aiskillstore-marketplace-flow-debugging && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/dimon94/flow-debugging/SKILL.mdsource content
Flow Debugging - Systematic Debugging Method
The Iron Law
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST
Bug fixing is not a guessing game. Systematic debugging = faster fixes + fewer regressions.
The 4-Phase Process
Phase 1: ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION (NO FIXES YET) ↓ Phase 2: PATTERN ANALYSIS ↓ Phase 3: HYPOTHESIS AND TESTING ↓ Phase 4: IMPLEMENTATION (TDD)
Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
Iron Law: In this phase, NO FIX CODE ALLOWED.
Step 1: Read Error Completely - Don't skip any details - Record: error type, message, stack trace - Record: when it happens, frequency, impact Step 2: Stable Reproduction - Find reliable reproduction steps - Record: inputs, environment, preconditions - If can't reproduce → gather more information Step 3: Check Recent Changes - git log --oneline -20 - git diff HEAD~5 - Ask: What changed? When did it start failing? Step 4: Trace Data Flow Backwards - Start from error point - Trace upstream - Find where data goes wrong
Output: Root cause hypothesis (evidence-based, not a guess)
Phase 2: Pattern Analysis
Step 1: Find Working Examples - Where does similar functionality work? - Compare: working vs broken Step 2: Compare with Reference - What does official documentation say? - How do other projects do it? - What's different? Step 3: Identify Patterns - Is this a known bug pattern? - Search: error message + framework name
Output: Confirmed or refined root cause hypothesis
Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing
Step 1: Form Single Hypothesis - "The problem is because X" - Hypothesis must be verifiable Step 2: Test One Variable at a Time - Change only one factor - Observe result - Record: what changed, what happened Step 3: 3+ Failed Fixes → STOP - If 3+ fix attempts fail - Stop and question architecture - Problem may be deeper than thought
Red Flag: If you're "trying this, trying that", you're guessing, not debugging.
Phase 4: Implementation (TDD)
Prerequisite: Phases 1-3 complete, root cause confirmed
Step 1: Write Failing Test First - Test must reproduce the bug - Run test, confirm it fails - This is your "red light" Step 2: Implement Single Fix - Fix only the root cause - Don't "while I'm here" other things - Minimal change Step 3: Verify - Run test, confirm it passes - Run related tests, confirm no regression - Manual verify original issue resolved
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I know where the problem is" | Prove it. Investigate first. |
| "Quick fix" | Quick fix = quick regression. Systematic debug. |
| "No time for tests" | No tests = don't know if really fixed. |
| "Small change" | Small changes can introduce big bugs. Test it. |
| "Fix first, investigate later" | Fixing without understanding = guessing. |
| "Let me try this" | "Trying" is not debugging. Form hypothesis, verify it. |
| "It's obvious" | Nothing is obvious. Prove with evidence. |
| "I've seen this before" | Every bug is unique. Investigate this one. |
Red Flags - STOP
If you find yourself:
- Fixing without reproduction
- "Trying this, trying that"
- 3+ failed fix attempts
- Saying "fixed" without tests
- Changing many files for one bug
STOP. Go back to Phase 1. Investigate root cause.
Debug Output Template
# Bug Analysis - ${BUG_ID} ## Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation ### Error Details - Type: [error type] - Message: [error message] - Stack: [key stack frames] ### Reproduction - Steps: [1, 2, 3...] - Frequency: [always/sometimes/rare] - Environment: [conditions] ### Recent Changes - [relevant commits] ### Data Flow Analysis - [where data goes wrong] ### Root Cause Hypothesis [Evidence-based hypothesis] ## Phase 2: Pattern Analysis ### Working Example [Where similar code works] ### Comparison [Difference between working and broken] ### Confirmed Root Cause [Refined hypothesis] ## Phase 3: Hypothesis Testing ### Hypothesis [Single testable hypothesis] ### Test Results | Change | Result | |--------|--------| | [change 1] | [result] | ## Phase 4: Implementation ### Failing Test [Test code that reproduces bug] ### Fix [Minimal fix code] ### Verification - [ ] Test passes - [ ] No regression - [ ] Manual verification
Integration with flow-fix
This skill is the core methodology for
/flow-fix command:
/flow-fix phases: 阶段 1: Root Cause Investigation → This skill Phase 1 阶段 2: Pattern Analysis & Planning → This skill Phase 2 阶段 3: 修复执行 (TDD) → This skill Phase 3-4 阶段 4: 验证与发布 → verification-before-completion
Cross-Reference
- flow-fix.md - Bug fix command
- flow-tdd/SKILL.md - TDD enforcement
- verification-before-completion - Verification skill
[PROTOCOL]: 变更时更新此头部,然后检查 CLAUDE.md