Marketplace subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
git clone https://github.com/aiskillstore/marketplace
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/aiskillstore/marketplace "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/dyai2025/subagent-driven-development" ~/.claude/skills/aiskillstore-marketplace-subagent-driven-development-c0955c && rm -rf "$T"
skills/dyai2025/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.mdSubagent-Driven Development
Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with code review after each.
Core principle: Fresh subagent per task + review between tasks = high quality, fast iteration
Overview
vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):
- Same session (no context switch)
- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
- Code review after each task (catch issues early)
- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)
When to use:
- Staying in this session
- Tasks are mostly independent
- Want continuous progress with quality gates
When NOT to use:
- Need to review plan first (use executing-plans)
- Tasks are tightly coupled (manual execution better)
- Plan needs revision (brainstorm first)
The Process
1. Load Plan
Read plan file, create TodoWrite with all tasks.
2. Execute Task with Subagent
For each task:
Dispatch fresh subagent:
Task tool (general-purpose): description: "Implement Task N: [task name]" prompt: | You are implementing Task N from [plan-file]. Read that task carefully. Your job is to: 1. Implement exactly what the task specifies 2. Write tests (following TDD if task says to) 3. Verify implementation works 4. Commit your work 5. Report back Work from: [directory] Report: What you implemented, what you tested, test results, files changed, any issues
Subagent reports back with summary of work.
3. Review Subagent's Work
Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:
Task tool (code-reviewer): Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from subagent's report] PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file] BASE_SHA: [commit before task] HEAD_SHA: [current commit] DESCRIPTION: [task summary]
Code reviewer returns: Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment
4. Apply Review Feedback
If issues found:
- Fix Critical issues immediately
- Fix Important issues before next task
- Note Minor issues
Dispatch follow-up subagent if needed:
"Fix issues from code review: [list issues]"
5. Mark Complete, Next Task
- Mark task as completed in TodoWrite
- Move to next task
- Repeat steps 2-5
6. Final Review
After all tasks complete, dispatch final code-reviewer:
- Reviews entire implementation
- Checks all plan requirements met
- Validates overall architecture
7. Complete Development
After final review passes:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
Example Workflow
You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan. [Load plan, create TodoWrite] Task 1: Hook installation script [Dispatch implementation subagent] Subagent: Implemented install-hook with tests, 5/5 passing [Get git SHAs, dispatch code-reviewer] Reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage. Issues: None. Ready. [Mark Task 1 complete] Task 2: Recovery modes [Dispatch implementation subagent] Subagent: Added verify/repair, 8/8 tests passing [Dispatch code-reviewer] Reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Missing progress reporting [Dispatch fix subagent] Fix subagent: Added progress every 100 conversations [Verify fix, mark Task 2 complete] ... [After all tasks] [Dispatch final code-reviewer] Final reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge Done!
Advantages
vs. Manual execution:
- Subagents follow TDD naturally
- Fresh context per task (no confusion)
- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)
vs. Executing Plans:
- Same session (no handoff)
- Continuous progress (no waiting)
- Review checkpoints automatic
Cost:
- More subagent invocations
- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)
Red Flags
Never:
- Skip code review between tasks
- Proceed with unfixed Critical issues
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
- Implement without reading plan task
If subagent fails task:
- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions
- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)
Integration
Required workflow skills:
- writing-plans - REQUIRED: Creates the plan that this skill executes
- requesting-code-review - REQUIRED: Review after each task (see Step 3)
- finishing-a-development-branch - REQUIRED: Complete development after all tasks (see Step 7)
Subagents must use:
- test-driven-development - Subagents follow TDD for each task
Alternative workflow:
- executing-plans - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution
See code-reviewer template: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md