Claude-Skills create-prd

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/project-management/execution/create-prd" ~/.claude/skills/borghei-claude-skills-create-prd && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: project-management/execution/create-prd/SKILL.md
source content

PRD Scaffolding Expert

Overview

Structured product requirements document creation using a proven 8-section framework. This skill produces clear, jargon-free PRDs that communicate what to build, why it matters, and how success is measured. Every PRD generated follows a consistent structure that keeps engineering, design, and business stakeholders aligned.

When to Use

  • New Product Initiative -- Starting a product from scratch and need a comprehensive spec before development begins.
  • Feature Expansion -- Adding significant functionality to an existing product that requires cross-team alignment.
  • Stakeholder Alignment -- Need a single document that answers "what are we building and why?" for everyone involved.

Pre-PRD Techniques

Before writing the PRD, use one or both of these techniques to sharpen the problem definition and align the team on value.

Technique A: Problem Framing Canvas

Frame the problem from the user's perspective before jumping to solutions. This canvas produces the narrative that feeds directly into PRD Sections 3 (Background) and 5 (Market Segments).

## Problem Framing Canvas

### Problem Framing Narrative

**I am**: [Describe the key persona experiencing the problem]
- [Key characteristic 1]
- [Key characteristic 2]
- [Key characteristic 3]

**Trying to**: [A single sentence listing the desired outcomes]

**But**:
- [Barrier preventing outcomes 1]
- [Barrier 2]
- [Barrier 3]

**Because**: [Root cause explanation in empathetic language]

**Which makes me feel**: [Emotional impact from persona perspective]

### Context & Constraints
- [Geographic, technological, time-based, organizational constraints]

### Final Problem Statement
- [Single concise, empathetic summary for stakeholder alignment]

### Assumptions to Validate
- [Assumption 1]
- [Assumption 2]

Next steps: Generate testable solution hypotheses, convert into a workshop facilitation guide, or create stakeholder-specific variants (Exec, Eng, Design).

Technique B: Working Backwards Press Release

Write an Amazon-style "future press release" announcing the product as if it already shipped. This forces you to articulate customer value before implementation.

## Working Backwards Press Release

"[Product Name] by [Company] Aims to [Main Purpose/Goal]"

"[City], [Date] --"

"Today, [Company], a [type of organization], announced [product/feature],
a [brief description]. This [product] is set to [main benefit], addressing
[key issue or need]."

"[Product] will [what it does/solves]. [Quote from key person]:
'[customer-outcome-focused quote].' This initiative reflects [Company]'s
commitment to [core value]."

"In addition to [mentioned features], [product] also [additional benefits].
According to [source], [relevant data supporting the news]."

**Media Contact:** [Name, Title, Email]

Writing rules:

  • Focus on customer outcomes, not feature lists.
  • Avoid hype; favor credible claims and concrete benefits.
  • If you can't write a compelling PR, the product concept needs more work.

Next steps: Generate an FAQ, create stakeholder-specific variants, generate objection-handling talking points, or define launch success metrics.


PRD Framework (8 Sections)

Section 1: Summary

Write 2-3 sentences that a busy executive can read in 10 seconds and understand the full scope. Answer three questions: What is this? Who is it for? Why are we doing it now?

Do not use marketing language. State the product, the user, and the expected outcome plainly.

Section 2: Contacts

A table of people involved in the decision:

NameRoleResponsibility
...Product ManagerFinal decision on scope
...Engineering LeadTechnical feasibility
...Design LeadUX direction
...StakeholderBusiness approval

Keep this short. Only list people who will actively contribute or approve.

Section 3: Background

Answer three questions:

  1. Context -- What is the current state? What exists today?
  2. Why now? -- What changed in the market, technology, or business that makes this urgent?
  3. What recently became possible? -- New capabilities, partnerships, data, or insights that enable this initiative.

This section sets the stage. A reader who skips every other section should still understand the motivation after reading Background.

Section 4: Objective

State the business benefit and the customer benefit separately:

  • Business benefit: How does this move a business metric? (revenue, retention, cost reduction, market share)
  • Customer benefit: How does this improve the user's life? (time saved, friction removed, new capability)

Then define 2-4 SMART Key Results in OKR format:

  • Objective: [qualitative, inspirational statement]
  • KR1: [metric] from [current] to [target] by [date]
  • KR2: [metric] from [current] to [target] by [date]
  • KR3: [metric] from [current] to [target] by [date]

Section 5: Market Segment(s)

Define segments by the problems they face or jobs they need done -- not by demographics. A segment is a group of people who share a common struggle or desired outcome.

Format: "[Segment name]: People who need to [job/problem] because [context]."

Bad: "Millennials aged 25-35 in urban areas" Good: "Time-constrained professionals who need to coordinate schedules across 3+ tools because their organization lacks a unified calendar system"

Section 6: Value Proposition(s)

For each market segment, define:

  1. Jobs addressed -- What tasks or goals does this product help accomplish?
  2. Gains created -- What positive outcomes does the user experience?
  3. Pains relieved -- What frustrations, risks, or obstacles are removed?
  4. Competitive advantage -- Why is our approach better than existing alternatives?

Use the Value Curve framework to visualize where you compete, where you exceed, and where you deliberately underinvest relative to alternatives.

Section 7: Solution

Break into subsections:

  • UX / Prototypes -- Key screens, flows, or interaction patterns. Link to design files.
  • Key Features -- Numbered list of features with one-sentence descriptions. Mark each as P0 (must-have), P1 (important), or P2 (nice-to-have).
  • Technology (optional) -- Architecture decisions, integrations, or infrastructure requirements that constrain the solution.
  • Assumptions -- Explicit list of things you believe to be true but have not validated. Each assumption should have a plan to validate it.

Section 8: Release

  • Relative timeline -- Use T-shirt sizes (S/M/L/XL) or Now/Next/Later rather than specific dates, unless dates are firm.
  • v1 scope -- What ships in the first version? Draw a clear line.
  • Future versions -- What is explicitly deferred? List it so stakeholders know it was considered but intentionally excluded.
  • Success criteria -- When do we know v1 succeeded? Reference the Key Results from Section 4.

Writing Principles

  • Plain language -- No jargon, no acronyms without definition, no buzzwords.
  • One idea per sentence -- If a sentence has "and" connecting two distinct ideas, split it.
  • Specificity over abstraction -- "Reduce onboarding from 12 steps to 4" beats "Simplify onboarding."
  • Saved as:
    PRD-[product-name].md

Workflow

  1. Gather context: product name, target segment, core problem.
  2. Run
    scripts/prd_scaffolder.py
    to generate the skeleton.
  3. Fill in each section using the guidance above and
    references/prd-writing-guide.md
    .
  4. Review against the checklist in
    references/prd-writing-guide.md
    .
  5. Share with stakeholders for feedback.

Tools

ToolPurposeCommand
prd_scaffolder.py
Generate PRD skeleton
python scripts/prd_scaffolder.py --product-name "MyProduct" --objective "Short description" --segments "Segment A, Segment B"

Troubleshooting

SymptomLikely CauseResolution
PRD scaffolder output is too genericOnly product name provided; objective and segments need specificityWrite a 1-2 sentence objective that states the outcome, not just the product category; define segments by jobs-to-be-done, not demographics
Stakeholders skip reading the PRDDocument too long, too jargon-heavy, or lacks a clear Summary sectionEnsure Section 1 (Summary) answers What/Who/Why in 3 sentences; cut any section beyond 1 page that is not Section 7
Engineering team builds the wrong thingPRD focuses on solution before establishing problem contextStrengthen Section 3 (Background) and Section 5 (Market Segments); ensure problem definition precedes solution
PRD assumptions never validatedAssumptions listed in Section 7 but no validation plan assignedAdd a validation plan column to the Assumptions table; link each assumption to
identify-assumptions/
or
brainstorm-experiments/
Scope creep after PRD approvalSection 8 (Release) does not clearly separate v1 from future versionsBe explicit about "Explicitly Deferred" items; ensure every stakeholder has seen and acknowledged the deferred list
PRD becomes stale during developmentTreated as a static document rather than a living referenceUpdate after implementation decisions change; archive final state and link to retrospective notes
--segments
flag parsing fails
Segments not properly comma-separated or contain special charactersWrap the segments argument in quotes:
--segments "Segment A, Segment B"

Success Criteria

  • PRD passes the "10-second executive test" -- a busy executive understands scope from Section 1 alone
  • All 8 sections are complete before development begins (no placeholder sections remain)
  • Market segments defined by jobs-to-be-done, not demographics
  • Key Results in Section 4 are measurable with baselines, targets, and deadlines
  • Every assumption in Section 7 has a validation plan and owner
  • PRD reviewed by PM, Engineering Lead, Design Lead, and at least one stakeholder before commitment
  • v1 scope in Section 8 draws a clear line between what ships and what is explicitly deferred

Scope & Limitations

In Scope:

  • 8-section PRD skeleton generation with guided placeholders
  • Section-by-section writing guidance following plain-language, specificity-over-abstraction principles
  • Market segment definition using jobs-to-be-done framework
  • Value proposition mapping with Value Curve competitive analysis
  • Release planning with Now/Next/Later and explicit deferral documentation

Out of Scope:

  • Technical architecture or system design documents (see
    engineering/
    skills)
  • User story writing and backlog creation (see
    execution/job-stories/
    and
    execution/wwas/
    )
  • Detailed UX research or usability testing plans (see
    product-team/
    skills)
  • Financial business case modeling (see
    finance/
    domain skills)

Important Caveats:

  • A PRD is a communication tool, not a contract. Treat it as a living document that evolves with implementation learning.
  • The 8-section framework is a proven structure, but lightweight agile teams may need only sections 1, 3, 4, 7, and 8. Heavyweight compliance contexts (medical devices, regulated industries) may need additional sections.
  • A 2025 Carnegie Mellon SEI study found that effective requirements management eliminates 50-80% of project defects. The investment in a clear PRD pays for itself in reduced rework.

Integration Points

IntegrationDirectionDescription
discovery/identify-assumptions/
Receives fromValidated and "Test Now" assumptions populate PRD Section 7 with evidence
discovery/brainstorm-experiments/
Receives fromExperiment results validate or invalidate PRD assumptions
discovery/pre-mortem/
Receives fromTiger mitigations become PRD risk sections
execution/brainstorm-okrs/
Feeds intoPRD Key Results (Section 4) align with quarterly OKR targets
execution/outcome-roadmap/
Feeds intoPRD release plan (Section 8) maps to roadmap Now/Next/Later horizons
execution/prioritization-frameworks/
Receives fromFeature priority (P0/P1/P2) in Section 7 informed by RICE/ICE scoring
senior-pm/
Feeds intoPRD stakeholder context feeds stakeholder mapper engagement plans

Tool Reference

prd_scaffolder.py

Generates a complete 8-section PRD markdown skeleton with guided placeholders, market segment sections, and value proposition templates.

FlagTypeDefaultDescription
--product-name
string(required)Name of the product (used in title and headers)
--objective
string(required)Short description of the product objective (1-2 sentences)
--segments
string(required)Comma-separated list of market segments
--output
stringstdoutOutput file path; if omitted, prints to stdout

References

  • references/prd-writing-guide.md
    -- Section-by-section writing guide and review checklist
  • assets/prd_template.md
    -- Complete PRD template ready to fill in