Agentops pr-plan
Plan an open source PR contribution. Takes pr-research output and produces scope, acceptance criteria, and risk assessment. Triggers: "pr plan", "contribution plan", "plan PR", "plan contribution".
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/boshu2/agentops
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/boshu2/agentops "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills-codex/pr-plan" ~/.claude/skills/boshu2-agentops-pr-plan && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills-codex/pr-plan/SKILL.mdsource content
PR Plan Skill
Strategic planning for open source contributions.
Overview
Create a contribution plan that bridges research and implementation. Takes
$pr-research output and produces an actionable plan.
Output:
.agents/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-pr-plan-{repo-slug}.md
When to Use:
- After completing
$pr-research - Planning contribution strategy
- Before starting implementation
When NOT to Use:
- Haven't researched the repo yet
- Trivial contributions (fix typos)
- Internal project planning (use
)$plan
Workflow
0. Input Discovery -> Find/load pr-research artifact 1. Scope Definition -> What exactly to contribute 2. Target Selection -> Which issues/areas to address 3. Criteria Definition -> Acceptance criteria from research 4. Risk Assessment -> What could go wrong 5. Strategy Formation -> Implementation approach 6. Output -> Write plan artifact
Phase 1: Scope Definition
Scope Questions
| Question | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| What specific functionality? | Clear deliverable |
| Which files/packages? | Limits impact surface |
| What's explicitly out of scope? | Prevents scope creep |
| Single PR or series? | Sets expectations |
Scope Template
## Scope **Contribution**: [1-2 sentences describing the change] **Affected Areas**: - `path/to/file.go` - [what changes] **Out of Scope**: - [Related but excluded work]
Phase 3: Acceptance Criteria
Define success from maintainer perspective:
## Acceptance Criteria ### Code Quality - [ ] Follows project coding style - [ ] Passes existing tests - [ ] Adds tests for new functionality - [ ] No linting warnings ### PR Requirements - [ ] Title follows convention - [ ] Body uses project template - [ ] Size within acceptable range - [ ] Single logical change ### Project-Specific - [ ] [Any project-specific requirements from research]
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR review takes > 2 weeks | Medium | Medium | Start small, be responsive |
| Scope expands during review | Medium | High | Define scope clearly upfront |
| Breaking change discovered | Low | High | Test against multiple versions |
Phase 5: Implementation Strategy
## Implementation Strategy ### Approach 1. **Setup**: Fork repo, configure dev environment 2. **Understand**: Read existing code in affected area 3. **Implement**: Make changes following project patterns 4. **Test**: Run existing tests + add new tests 5. **Document**: Update any affected documentation 6. **Submit**: Create PR following project conventions ### Pre-Implementation Checklist - [ ] Fork created and up-to-date with upstream - [ ] Dev environment working - [ ] Issue claimed or comment posted - [ ] Recent repo activity reviewed
Output Template
Write to
.agents/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-pr-plan-{repo-slug}.md
# PR Plan: {repo-name} ## Executive Summary {2-3 sentences: what you're contributing, why, expected outcome} ## Scope **Contribution**: {description} **Affected Areas**: [list] **Out of Scope**: [list] ## Target **Primary Issue**: #{N} - {title} ## Acceptance Criteria [checklist] ## Risk Assessment [table] ## Implementation Strategy [numbered steps] ## Next Steps 1. Claim/comment on target issue 2. Fork and set up development environment 3. Implement following strategy 4. Run `$pr-prep` when ready
Workflow Integration
$pr-research <repo> -> $pr-plan <research> -> implement -> $pr-prep
Examples
Plan a Focused External Contribution
User says: "Create a contribution plan from my PR research artifact."
What happens:
- Extract accepted conventions and constraints.
- Define scope boundaries and acceptance criteria.
- Produce an implementation strategy with risks.
Tighten Scope Before Coding
User says: "Check if this PR plan is too large for one submission."
What happens:
- Compare proposed changes to historical PR size patterns.
- Split oversized scope into phased contributions.
- Emit a revised plan and next-step checklist.
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Plan has vague acceptance criteria | Criteria not measurable | Convert criteria to concrete behavioral checks |
| Scope too broad | Multiple concerns mixed | Split by user-visible change or subsystem boundary |
| Risk section is weak | Missing failure-mode analysis | Add integration, review, and rollback risks explicitly |
| Plan conflicts with repo norms | Research artifact incomplete | Re-run and refresh constraints |
Local Resources
scripts/
scripts/validate.sh