Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research code-flow-visualizer

Convert Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript functions into Mermaid flowcharts

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/tools/diagram/code-flow-visualizer" ~/.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research-code-flow-visuali && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/tools/diagram/code-flow-visualizer/SKILL.md
source content

Code Flow Visualizer

Convert Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript functions into Mermaid flowcharts by analyzing control flow structures. This skill helps researchers document and understand complex algorithmic logic, data processing pipelines, and experimental workflows embedded in code.

Overview

Research code often contains intricate control flow: nested conditionals for data filtering, loops over experimental conditions, error handling for API calls, and branching logic for different analysis paths. Understanding this flow is critical for reproducibility, code review, and documentation, yet reading nested code can be cognitively demanding.

This skill translates source code into visual Mermaid flowcharts by parsing control flow structures (if/else, for/while loops, try/catch, match/switch, return statements) and mapping them to flowchart nodes and edges. The resulting diagrams serve as documentation supplements in README files, lab notebooks, and paper appendices.

The approach works by performing a lightweight static analysis of the code's abstract syntax tree (AST). Each control structure maps to a specific flowchart pattern: conditionals become diamond decision nodes, loops become cycles with back-edges, function calls become subroutine nodes, and return statements become terminal nodes.

Conversion Rules

Control Flow Mapping

Code StructureFlowchart ElementMermaid Shape
Function entryStart node
([Function Name])
Assignment / expressionProcess node
[statement]
if
/
else if
Decision diamond
{condition?}
for
/
while
loop
Decision + back-edge
{loop condition?}
with cycle
try
/
catch
Process + error path
[try block]
with dashed error edge
return
/
yield
Terminal / output node
([return value])
Function callSubroutine node
[[function_name()]]
match
/
switch
Multi-branch decision
{value?}
with labeled edges

Python Example

Input code:

def process_papers(papers, min_citations=10):
    results = []
    for paper in papers:
        if paper.year < 2015:
            continue
        if paper.citation_count < min_citations:
            continue
        try:
            abstract = fetch_abstract(paper.doi)
            embeddings = compute_embeddings(abstract)
            results.append({"paper": paper, "embedding": embeddings})
        except APIError:
            log_error(paper.doi)
    return results

Output flowchart:

flowchart TD
    Start(["process_papers(papers, min_citations=10)"]) --> Init["results = [ ]"]
    Init --> Loop{"For each paper in papers?"}
    Loop -->|Done| Return(["Return results"])
    Loop -->|Next paper| YearCheck{"paper.year < 2015?"}
    YearCheck -->|Yes| Loop
    YearCheck -->|No| CitCheck{"citation_count < min_citations?"}
    CitCheck -->|Yes| Loop
    CitCheck -->|No| TryBlock["abstract = fetch_abstract(paper.doi)"]
    TryBlock --> Embed["embeddings = compute_embeddings(abstract)"]
    Embed --> Append["results.append(...)"]
    Append --> Loop
    TryBlock -.->|APIError| LogErr["log_error(paper.doi)"]
    LogErr --> Loop

JavaScript / TypeScript Example

Input code:

async function searchPapers(query: string, maxResults: number = 50): Promise<Paper[]> {
    const cached = await cache.get(query);
    if (cached) return cached;

    const results: Paper[] = [];
    let offset = 0;

    while (results.length < maxResults) {
        const batch = await api.search(query, offset, 10);
        if (batch.length === 0) break;

        for (const paper of batch) {
            if (paper.isRetracted) continue;
            results.push(paper);
        }
        offset += 10;
    }

    await cache.set(query, results);
    return results;
}

Output flowchart:

flowchart TD
    Start(["searchPapers(query, maxResults=50)"]) --> Cache["cached = await cache.get(query)"]
    Cache --> CacheHit{"cached exists?"}
    CacheHit -->|Yes| ReturnCached(["Return cached"])
    CacheHit -->|No| InitResults["results = [ ], offset = 0"]
    InitResults --> WhileLoop{"results.length < maxResults?"}
    WhileLoop -->|No| SaveCache["await cache.set(query, results)"]
    WhileLoop -->|Yes| Fetch["batch = await api.search(query, offset, 10)"]
    Fetch --> EmptyCheck{"batch.length === 0?"}
    EmptyCheck -->|Yes| SaveCache
    EmptyCheck -->|No| ForLoop{"For each paper in batch?"}
    ForLoop -->|Done| IncOffset["offset += 10"]
    IncOffset --> WhileLoop
    ForLoop -->|Next| Retracted{"paper.isRetracted?"}
    Retracted -->|Yes| ForLoop
    Retracted -->|No| Push["results.push(paper)"]
    Push --> ForLoop
    SaveCache --> Return(["Return results"])

Handling Complex Patterns

Nested Conditionals

Deeply nested if/else chains are flattened into a decision tree. Each branch is labeled with its condition, and nodes at the same depth are arranged vertically for readability.

Recursive Functions

Recursive calls are shown as subroutine nodes with a self-referencing edge back to the function start node. A note annotation indicates the recursion base case.

Generator Functions (yield)

Python generators use

yield
as intermediate output nodes (shown as parallelogram shapes). The flowchart shows the suspension point and resumption path.

Error Handling Chains

Multiple

except
clauses create parallel error paths from the
try
block, each labeled with the exception type.
finally
blocks are shown as a converging node that all paths pass through.

Styling for Documentation

Academic Paper Style

%%{init: {
  'theme': 'base',
  'themeVariables': {
    'primaryColor': '#f8f9fa',
    'primaryBorderColor': '#212529',
    'primaryTextColor': '#212529',
    'lineColor': '#495057',
    'fontFamily': 'Times New Roman, serif',
    'fontSize': '14px'
  }
}}%%
flowchart TD
    A["Step 1"] --> B{"Decision"} --> C["Step 2"]

Export for LaTeX

# Render Mermaid to PDF for LaTeX inclusion
mmdc -i flowchart.mmd -o flowchart.pdf -t neutral -b transparent
\begin{figure}[h]
    \centering
    \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{flowchart.pdf}
    \caption{Control flow of the data processing pipeline.}
    \label{fig:flowchart}
\end{figure}

Limitations and Best Practices

  1. Scope: Works best for functions under 100 lines. For larger codebases, visualize individual functions or extract key subroutines.
  2. Dynamic dispatch: Cannot trace through dynamic method resolution or callback chains. Show these as labeled subroutine nodes.
  3. Concurrency: Async/await is shown sequentially. Concurrent branches (e.g.,
    Promise.all
    ) are noted but not fully modeled.
  4. Simplification: Omit trivial assignments and logging statements to keep diagrams focused on control flow.

References