Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research introduction-writing-guide
Guide to writing effective research paper introductions
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/writing/composition/introduction-writing-guide" ~/.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research-introduction-writ && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/writing/composition/introduction-writing-guide/SKILL.mdsource content
Introduction Writing Guide
Write compelling research paper introductions using the CARS (Create A Research Space) model with structured approaches for establishing context, identifying gaps, and motivating your study.
The CARS Model
John Swales' Create A Research Space (CARS) model is the most widely used framework for structuring academic introductions. It consists of three rhetorical "moves":
| Move | Purpose | Typical Length |
|---|---|---|
| Move 1: Establishing a territory | Show the research area is important and active | 2-4 paragraphs |
| Move 2: Establishing a niche | Identify a gap, question, or problem | 1-2 paragraphs |
| Move 3: Occupying the niche | State what your paper does to address the gap | 1-2 paragraphs |
Move 1: Establishing a Territory
Strategy 1A: Claiming Centrality
Signal that the topic is important, interesting, or well-established:
Pattern phrases: - "X has attracted considerable attention in recent years..." - "The role of X in Y is well established..." - "X is a fundamental aspect of..." - "Understanding X is critical for..." - "Recent advances in X have transformed..."
Strategy 1B: Making Topic Generalizations
Summarize the current state of knowledge:
Pattern phrases: - "Previous studies have demonstrated that..." - "It is widely accepted that X leads to Y..." - "Several approaches have been proposed to address X, including..." - "Research in this area has traditionally focused on..."
Strategy 1C: Reviewing Previous Research
Cite specific studies to build the scholarly context:
Example paragraph: "Smith et al. (2020) demonstrated that X improves Y by 30%. Building on this finding, Jones (2021) extended the approach to Z domain, reporting similar gains. Meanwhile, Chen and Lee (2022) proposed an alternative framework that addresses the scalability limitations of earlier methods."
Tips for Move 1:
- Funnel from broad to narrow: start with the general field, then narrow to your specific topic
- Cite 10-20 papers across Move 1 (varies by field)
- Balance classic/foundational references with recent work
- Use present tense for established knowledge, past tense for specific findings
Move 2: Establishing a Niche
This is the most critical move. You must convince the reader that there is a problem worth solving.
Strategy 2A: Counter-Claiming (Challenging Previous Work)
Pattern phrases: - "However, these approaches suffer from..." - "Despite these advances, X remains poorly understood..." - "A major limitation of existing methods is..." - "These findings have been contradicted by..."
Strategy 2B: Indicating a Gap
Pattern phrases: - "To date, no study has examined..." - "Little attention has been paid to..." - "The relationship between X and Y has not been explored..." - "A comprehensive analysis of X is still lacking..."
Strategy 2C: Raising a Question
Pattern phrases: - "An open question is whether X can be applied to..." - "It remains unclear how X affects Y under conditions Z..." - "This raises the question of..."
Strategy 2D: Continuing a Tradition
Pattern phrases: - "Following the approach of Smith (2020), we extend..." - "Building on recent advances in X, this paper..."
Tips for Move 2:
- The gap must be clearly linked to the context established in Move 1
- Do not criticize previous work too harshly; use hedging language
- The gap must be specific enough that your paper can plausibly fill it
Move 3: Occupying the Niche
Strategy 3A: Outlining Purposes
Pattern phrases: - "In this paper, we propose..." - "The present study aims to..." - "This work introduces a novel approach to..." - "We address this gap by..."
Strategy 3B: Announcing Principal Findings
Pattern phrases: - "Our results demonstrate that..." - "We show that X outperforms Y by Z%..." - "The key finding is that..."
Strategy 3C: Indicating Article Structure
Example: "The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews related work. Section 3 describes our methodology. Section 4 presents experimental results. Section 5 discusses implications and limitations. Section 6 concludes."
Complete Introduction Template
[Move 1A: Centrality claim - 1-2 sentences] [Topic] is a critical challenge in [field], with applications in [area 1], [area 2], and [area 3]. [Move 1B-1C: Background and review - 2-3 paragraphs] Previous work has established that [known fact]. Smith et al. (2020) showed [finding 1]. Jones (2021) extended this to [finding 2]. More recently, Chen (2022) demonstrated [finding 3]. [Move 2: Gap identification - 1 paragraph] However, existing approaches have several limitations. First, [limitation 1]. Second, [limitation 2]. To date, no work has addressed [specific gap]. [Move 3A: Purpose statement - 1-2 sentences] In this paper, we propose [method/framework] to address [gap]. Our approach differs from prior work in [key difference]. [Move 3B: Key findings - 1-2 sentences] Our experiments on [benchmark] demonstrate that [main result], achieving [quantitative improvement] over the state of the art. [Move 3C: Structure outline - optional, 1-2 sentences] The rest of this paper is organized as follows...
Common Mistakes to Avoid
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Too broad opening | "Since the dawn of time..." | Start at the field level, not civilization level |
| No clear gap | Reader does not understand why the paper is needed | State the gap explicitly in 1-2 sentences |
| Overpromising | Claims too broad relative to actual contribution | Use hedging: "we investigate" not "we solve" |
| Citing too few papers | Appears unaware of related work | Cite 15-25 papers in a typical introduction |
| Too long | Buries the contribution | Aim for 1-2 pages (conference) or 2-4 pages (journal) |
| Jargon overload | Inaccessible to non-specialist reviewers | Define key terms on first use |
Discipline-Specific Variations
- STEM: Move 3B (findings preview) is common; quantitative results often stated in the introduction
- Social Sciences: More extensive literature review in Move 1; theoretical framing is expected
- Humanities: Move 2 often involves interpretive questions rather than empirical gaps; longer introductions are acceptable
- Medical/Clinical: Often follows IMRAD strictly; hypothesis stated explicitly in Move 3