Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research legal-research-guide
Legal research methods, case law analysis, and compliance tools
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/law/legal-research-guide" ~/.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research-legal-research-gu && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/law/legal-research-guide/SKILL.mdsource content
Legal Research Guide
Conduct systematic legal research across jurisdictions, analyze case law, navigate statutory frameworks, and use computational legal tools for academic and practice-oriented research.
Legal Research Frameworks
IRAC Method
The standard analytical framework for legal reasoning:
| Step | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Issue | Identify the legal question | "Does web scraping of public data constitute a CFAA violation?" |
| Rule | State the applicable legal rule | "The CFAA prohibits accessing a computer 'without authorization' or 'exceeding authorized access'" |
| Application | Apply the rule to the facts | "In hiQ v. LinkedIn, the 9th Circuit held that scraping publicly available data does not violate the CFAA..." |
| Conclusion | State the legal conclusion | "Therefore, scraping publicly available academic data likely does not violate the CFAA, though terms-of-service issues remain." |
CREAC Method (For Academic Legal Writing)
C - Conclusion (state your thesis) R - Rule (present the legal rule with authority) E - Explanation (analyze how courts have interpreted the rule) A - Application (apply the rule to your specific scenario) C - Conclusion (restate and refine conclusion)
Legal Research Databases
Primary Sources
| Database | Coverage | Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westlaw (Thomson Reuters) | US, UK, EU, international | Subscription | Comprehensive case law, KeyCite citator |
| LexisNexis | US, UK, international | Subscription | News integration, Shepard's citator |
| Google Scholar (Case Law) | US federal and state courts | Free | Quick case lookup, citation tracking |
| Casetext / CoCounsel | US courts | Subscription | AI-powered legal research |
| CourtListener | US federal courts | Free | PACER alternative, bulk data |
| EUR-Lex | EU law | Free | EU legislation, CJEU case law |
| BAILII | UK, Ireland | Free | UK case law and legislation |
| Justia | US law | Free | US case law, statutes, regulations |
| HeinOnline | Historical legal materials | Subscription | Law journals, treaties, legislative history |
Secondary Sources
| Source | Content | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Law reviews / journals | Scholarly analysis | Academic research, policy arguments |
| Restatements | ALI compilations of common law | Authoritative secondary source |
| Treatises | Comprehensive subject coverage | Deep dive into specific areas |
| Legal encyclopedias (AmJur, CJS) | Broad legal summaries | Starting point for unfamiliar areas |
| Practice guides | Practical how-to | Practitioner-oriented research |
Citation Systems
Bluebook (US Standard)
# Case citation Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803). Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954). # Statute citation 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (2018). Cal. Civ. Code Section 1798.100 (West 2020). # California statute # Law review article Jane Smith, The Future of AI Regulation, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 456 (2024). # Book Richard Posner, Economic Analysis of Law 25 (9th ed. 2014). # Short form citations (after first full citation) Brown, 347 U.S. at 495. Smith, supra note 12, at 460. Id. at 462. # Same source as immediately preceding citation
OSCOLA (UK/Oxford Standard)
# Case citation Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (HL). R v Brown [1994] 1 AC 212, 237 (HL). # Statute citation Human Rights Act 1998, s 3. Data Protection Act 2018, s 170(1). # Journal article Jane Smith, 'The Future of AI Regulation' (2024) 120 Modern Law Review 456. # Book Richard Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (9th edn, Aspen 2014) 25.
Computational Legal Research
Case Law Analysis with Python
import requests import json # Using the CourtListener API (free, open-source) BASE_URL = "https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v3" def search_opinions(query, court="scotus", page_size=20): """Search case opinions via CourtListener API.""" response = requests.get( f"{BASE_URL}/search/", params={ "q": query, "type": "o", # opinions "court": court, "page_size": page_size, "order_by": "score desc" }, headers={"Authorization": "Token YOUR_API_TOKEN"} ) results = response.json() for case in results.get("results", []): print(f"[{case.get('dateFiled', 'N/A')}] {case.get('caseName', 'N/A')}") print(f" Court: {case.get('court', 'N/A')}") print(f" Citation: {case.get('citation', ['N/A'])[0] if case.get('citation') else 'N/A'}") print(f" URL: https://www.courtlistener.com{case.get('absolute_url', '')}") return results # Search for AI-related Supreme Court cases results = search_opinions("artificial intelligence", court="scotus")
Citation Network Analysis
import networkx as nx def build_citation_network(seed_case_ids, depth=2): """Build a citation network starting from seed cases.""" G = nx.DiGraph() visited = set() queue = [(cid, 0) for cid in seed_case_ids] while queue: case_id, level = queue.pop(0) if case_id in visited or level > depth: continue visited.add(case_id) # Get case metadata and citations resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/opinions/{case_id}/", headers={"Authorization": "Token YOUR_API_TOKEN"}) if resp.status_code != 200: continue case = resp.json() case_name = case.get("case_name", f"Case {case_id}") G.add_node(case_id, name=case_name, date=case.get("date_filed")) # Get citing opinions (who cites this case) for cited_id in case.get("opinions_cited", []): G.add_edge(case_id, cited_id) if level < depth: queue.append((cited_id, level + 1)) return G # Analyze: which cases are most cited (highest in-degree)? # These are the most authoritative precedents
Statutory Text Analysis
# Analyzing legislative text complexity import re from textstat import textstat def analyze_statute(text): """Compute readability metrics for statutory text.""" return { "flesch_reading_ease": textstat.flesch_reading_ease(text), "flesch_kincaid_grade": textstat.flesch_kincaid_grade(text), "gunning_fog": textstat.gunning_fog(text), "word_count": textstat.lexicon_count(text), "sentence_count": textstat.sentence_count(text), "avg_sentence_length": textstat.avg_sentence_length(text), "defined_terms": len(re.findall(r'"[A-Z][^"]*"', text)), "cross_references": len(re.findall(r'[Ss]ection \d+', text)) } # Example: Analyze a section of the GDPR gdpr_article_5 = """ Personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject; collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes; adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed. """ print(analyze_statute(gdpr_article_5))
Research Areas in Law
| Area | Key Topics | Interdisciplinary Connections |
|---|---|---|
| AI & Law | Algorithmic fairness, liability for autonomous systems, AI regulation | CS, philosophy |
| IP Law | Patent, copyright, trade secret, open source licensing | Engineering, business |
| Privacy Law | GDPR, CCPA, surveillance, data protection | CS, political science |
| Law & Economics | Efficiency analysis of legal rules, behavioral law & economics | Economics |
| Comparative Law | Cross-jurisdictional analysis, legal transplants | Political science |
| International Law | Treaties, humanitarian law, trade law | International relations |
| Environmental Law | Climate litigation, ESG regulation, environmental justice | Environmental science |
| Health Law | Clinical trial regulation, health data, bioethics | Medicine, public health |
Practical Research Workflow
- Frame the legal question using IRAC or CREAC structure
- Search secondary sources first (treatises, law reviews) for background
- Identify governing law (federal vs. state, statutory vs. common law)
- Find controlling authority (binding precedent in your jurisdiction)
- Shepardize / KeyCite every case to ensure it is still good law
- Analyze and synthesize cases by extracting rules, holdings, and reasoning
- Consider policy arguments drawing on law and economics, empirical legal studies, or comparative law perspectives
- Update regularly as law changes frequently (set up alerts on Westlaw/Lexis)
Top Academic Venues
| Journal | Rank | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Harvard Law Review | T1 | General |
| Yale Law Journal | T1 | General |
| Stanford Law Review | T1 | General, tech law |
| Columbia Law Review | T1 | General |
| Journal of Legal Studies | T1 | Law & economics |
| Journal of Empirical Legal Studies | T1 | Empirical methods |
| Computer Law & Security Review | Field | Technology law |
| Berkeley Technology Law Journal | Field | Tech, IP |