Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research lit-review
Structured literature search and synthesis with citation extraction and gap identification.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/14-luischanci-claude-code-research-starter/dot-claude/skills/lit-review" ~/.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research-lit-review-de8488 && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/14-luischanci-claude-code-research-starter/dot-claude/skills/lit-review/SKILL.mdsource content
Literature Review
Conduct a structured literature search and synthesis on the given topic.
Steps
-
Check existing materials:
- Read
for uploaded papersmaster_supporting_docs/supporting_papers/ - Read existing
files for already-cited works.bib - Check CLAUDE.md and MEMORY.md for project context
- Read
-
Search for literature:
- Use
for recent publications (last 5-10 years prioritized)WebSearch - Use
for accessible papers and abstractsWebFetch - Search for working papers on NBER, SSRN, RePEc
- Use
-
Organize findings into:
- Theoretical contributions: Key models and frameworks
- Empirical findings: Main results and methods used
- Methodological innovations: New techniques relevant to the topic
- Open debates: Unresolved questions and conflicting evidence
-
Identify gaps and opportunities: What questions remain unanswered? Where could new work contribute?
-
Extract citations in BibTeX format for relevant papers.
-
Save report to
.quality_reports/lit_review_[sanitized_topic].md
Important
- Distinguish working papers from published papers.
- Explicitly flag any citation you cannot verify rather than fabricating details.
- Prioritize papers from top journals in the field.
- Note the identification strategy used in each empirical paper.