Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research pedagogy-review

Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing.

install

source · Clone the upstream repo

git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research

Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/

T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/12-pedrohcgs-claude-code-my-workflow/dot-claude/skills/pedagogy-review" ~/.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research-pedagogy-review && rm -rf "$T"

manifest: skills/12-pedrohcgs-claude-code-my-workflow/dot-claude/skills/pedagogy-review/SKILL.md

source content

Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides

Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review.

Steps

Identify the file specified in
```
$ARGUMENTS
```
- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name, look in
```
Quarto/
```
  or
```
Slides/
```
Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path
- The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
- Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)

The agent produces a report saved to:

quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md

Present summary to user:
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
- Deck-level assessments
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)

Important Notes

This is a read-only review — no files are edited
Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use
```
/visual-audit
```
for that)
For a combined review, use
```
/slide-excellence
```
instead