Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research slide-excellence

Multi-agent slide review (visual, pedagogy, proofreading). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.

install

source · Clone the upstream repo

git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research

Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/

T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/12-pedrohcgs-claude-code-my-workflow/dot-claude/skills/slide-excellence" ~/.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research-slide-excellence && rm -rf "$T"

manifest: skills/12-pedrohcgs-claude-code-my-workflow/dot-claude/skills/slide-excellence/SKILL.md

source content

Slide Excellence Review

Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of lecture slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.

Steps

1. Identify the File

Parse

$ARGUMENTS

for the filename. Resolve path in

Quarto/

Slides/

2. Run Review Agents in Parallel

Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)

Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images
Save:
```
quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md
```

Agent 2: Pedagogical Review (pedagogy-reviewer)

13 pedagogical patterns, narrative, pacing, notation

Save:

quality_reports/[FILE]_pedagogy_report.md

Agent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)

Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations
Save:
```
quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md
```

Agent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)

Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics
Save:
```
quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md
```

Agent 5: Content Parity (only for .qmd files with corresponding .tex)

Frame count comparison, environment parity, content drift
Save:
```
quality_reports/[FILE]_parity_report.md
```

Agent 6: Substance Review (optional, for .tex files)

Domain correctness via domain-reviewer protocol

Save:

quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md

3. Synthesize Combined Summary

# Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]

## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]

| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
|-----------|----------|--------|-----|
| Visual/Layout | | | |
| Pedagogical | | | |
| Proofreading | | | |

### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
### Medium Issues (Next Revision)
### Recommended Next Steps

Quality Score Rubric

Score	Critical	Medium	Meaning
Excellent	0-2	0-5	Ready to present
Good	3-5	6-15	Minor refinements
Needs Work	6-10	16-30	Significant revision
Poor	11+	31+	Major restructuring