Skills exunit-code-review

Reviews ExUnit test code for proper patterns, boundary mocking with Mox, and test adapter usage. Use when reviewing _test.exs files or test helper configurations.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/anderskev/exunit-code-review" ~/.claude/skills/clawdbot-skills-exunit-code-review && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/anderskev/exunit-code-review/SKILL.md
source content

ExUnit Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Async tests, setup, describe, tagsreferences/exunit-patterns.md
Behavior-based mocking, expectationsreferences/mox-boundaries.md
Bypass, Swoosh, Oban testingreferences/test-adapters.md
What to mock vs real, Ecto sandboxreferences/integration-tests.md

Mock Boundary Philosophy

Mock at external boundaries:

  • HTTP clients, external APIs, third-party services
  • Slow resources: file system, email, job queues
  • Non-deterministic: DateTime.utc_now(), :rand

DO NOT mock internal code:

  • Contexts, schemas, GenServers
  • Internal modules, PubSub
  • Anything you wrote

Review Checklist

Test Structure

  • Tests are
    async: true
    unless sharing database state
  • Describe-blocks group related tests
  • Setup extracts common test data
  • Tests have clear arrange/act/assert structure

Mocking

  • Mox used for external boundaries (HTTP, APIs)
  • Behaviors defined for mockable interfaces
  • No mocking of internal modules
  • verify_on_exit! in setup for strict mocking

Test Adapters

  • Bypass for HTTP endpoint mocking
  • Swoosh.TestAdapter for email testing
  • Oban.Testing for background job assertions

Database

  • Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox for isolation
  • Async tests don't share database state
  • Fixtures/factories used consistently

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • Mock in unit test, real in integration - Different test levels have different needs
  • Not mocking database in integration tests - Database is internal
  • Simple inline test data - Not everything needs factories
  • Testing private functions via public API - Correct approach

Context-Sensitive Rules

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Not asyncTest actually needs shared state
Missing mockExternal call exists AND no mock/bypass
Mock internalModule being mocked is internal code

Before Submitting Findings

Use the issue format:

[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
for each finding.

Load and follow review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.