Skills opportunity-scout
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/avnikulin35/opportunity-scout" ~/.claude/skills/clawdbot-skills-opportunity-scout && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/avnikulin35/opportunity-scout/SKILL.mdsource content
AI Opportunity Scout
Find what people need → evaluate if you can build it → decide if it's worth it.
Quick Start
When the user specifies a niche (e.g. "AI agents", "crypto trading", "SaaS tools"):
- Run the scout pipeline below
- Score each finding with
scripts/scout.py - Present the ranked report
Scout Pipeline
Step 1: Gather Data (use your built-in tools)
Run these searches, adapting queries to the user's niche:
Twitter (via exec):
bird search "[niche] need OR wish OR looking for OR frustrated" --limit 20 bird search "[niche] tool OR plugin OR solution" --limit 20
Web (via web_search tool):
"[niche] pain points 2026""[niche] tools people want""site:reddit.com [niche] need OR wish OR looking for""site:producthunt.com [niche]"
ClawHub (if niche is AI/agent related):
clawdhub search "[niche keyword]"
Step 2: Identify Opportunities
From the raw data, extract distinct opportunities. Each opportunity = a specific unmet need that could become a product. Look for:
- Repeated complaints/requests (same problem mentioned 3+ times)
- Gaps between what exists and what people want
- Problems with existing solutions (too expensive, too complex, missing features)
- Emerging trends without established solutions
Step 3: Score Each Opportunity
Run the scoring script:
python3 scripts/scout.py score --input opportunities.json --output report.md
Or score manually using these criteria (1-5 each):
| Criterion | 5 (Best) | 3 (Medium) | 1 (Worst) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demand | 50+ people asking | 10-20 mentions | 1-2 mentions |
| Competition | No solutions exist | Some solutions, all flawed | Saturated market |
| Feasibility | Build MVP in 1-2 days | 1-2 weeks | Months of work |
| Monetization | People actively paying for similar | Freemium possible | Hard to charge |
Total Score interpretation:
- 16-20: 🔥 BUILD IT NOW
- 12-15: 👍 Strong opportunity, worth pursuing
- 8-11: 🤔 Monitor, not urgent
- 4-7: ❌ Skip
Detailed scoring examples: see
references/scoring-guide.md
Step 4: Generate Report
Format results as:
# Opportunity Scout: [Niche] — [Date] ## 🏆 Top 3 Opportunities ### 1. [Name] (Score: X/20) - **Problem:** [What people need] - **Evidence:** [Links/quotes from research] - **Scores:** D:[X] C:[X] F:[X] M:[X] - **Action:** [What to build, how long, how to monetize] ### 2. [Name] (Score: X/20) ... ## All Findings | # | Opportunity | D | C | F | M | Total | Verdict | |---|------------|---|---|---|---|-------|---------| | 1 | ... | | | | | | | ## Recommendation [Which to build first and why]
Depth Modes
: 2 Twitter + 2 web searches. Fast scan, ~2 min.--depth quick
: 4 Twitter + 4 web + ClawHub. Standard, ~5 min.--depth normal
: 6 Twitter + 8 web + ClawHub + Reddit deep dive. Thorough, ~10 min.--depth deep
Tips
- Focus on problems people PAY to solve, not just complain about
- "I wish..." and "Does anyone know a tool for..." = strongest signals
- Check if existing solutions are abandoned/unmaintained — easy to replace
- Crypto/finance niches: high monetization but also high competition
- Niche down: "AI agent for dentists" beats "AI agent" every time