git clone https://github.com/ComeOnOliver/skillshub
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/ComeOnOliver/skillshub "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/paperclipai/paperclip/release-changelog" ~/.claude/skills/comeonoliver-skillshub-release-changelog && rm -rf "$T"
skills/paperclipai/paperclip/release-changelog/SKILL.mdRelease Changelog Skill
Generate the user-facing changelog for the stable Paperclip release.
Output:
releases/v{version}.md
Important rule:
- even if there are canary releases such as
, the changelog file stays1.2.3-canary.0releases/v1.2.3.md
Step 0 — Idempotency Check
Before generating anything, check whether the file already exists:
ls releases/v{version}.md 2>/dev/null
If it exists:
- read it first
- present it to the reviewer
- ask whether to keep it, regenerate it, or update specific sections
- never overwrite it silently
Step 1 — Determine the Stable Range
Find the last stable tag:
git tag --list 'v*' --sort=-version:refname | head -1 git log v{last}..HEAD --oneline --no-merges
The planned stable version comes from one of:
- an explicit maintainer request
- the chosen bump type applied to the last stable tag
- the release plan already agreed in
doc/RELEASING.md
Do not derive the changelog version from a canary tag or prerelease suffix.
Step 2 — Gather the Raw Inputs
Collect release data from:
- git commits since the last stable tag
files.changeset/*.md- merged PRs via
when availablegh
Useful commands:
git log v{last}..HEAD --oneline --no-merges git log v{last}..HEAD --format="%H %s" --no-merges ls .changeset/*.md | grep -v README.md gh pr list --state merged --search "merged:>={last-tag-date}" --json number,title,body,labels
Step 3 — Detect Breaking Changes
Look for:
- destructive migrations
- removed or changed API fields/endpoints
- renamed or removed config keys
changesetsmajor
orBREAKING:
commit signalsBREAKING CHANGE:
Key commands:
git diff --name-only v{last}..HEAD -- packages/db/src/migrations/ git diff v{last}..HEAD -- packages/db/src/schema/ git diff v{last}..HEAD -- server/src/routes/ server/src/api/ git log v{last}..HEAD --format="%s" | rg -n 'BREAKING CHANGE|BREAKING:|^[a-z]+!:' || true
If the requested bump is lower than the minimum required bump, flag that before the release proceeds.
Step 4 — Categorize for Users
Use these stable changelog sections:
Breaking ChangesHighlightsImprovementsFixes
when neededUpgrade Guide
Exclude purely internal refactors, CI changes, and docs-only work unless they materially affect users.
Guidelines:
- group related commits into one user-facing entry
- write from the user perspective
- keep highlights short and concrete
- spell out upgrade actions for breaking changes
Inline PR and contributor attribution
When a bullet item clearly maps to a merged pull request, add inline attribution at the end of the entry in this format:
- **Feature name** — Description. ([#123](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/123), @contributor1, @contributor2)
Rules:
- Only add a PR link when you can confidently trace the bullet to a specific merged PR.
Use merge commit messages (
) to map PRs.Merge pull request #N from user/branch - List the contributor(s) who authored the PR. Use GitHub usernames, not real names or emails.
- If multiple PRs contributed to a single bullet, list them all:
.([#10](url), [#12](url), @user1, @user2) - If you cannot determine the PR number or contributor with confidence, omit the attribution parenthetical — do not guess.
- Core maintainer commits that don't have an external PR can omit the parenthetical.
Step 5 — Write the File
Template:
# v{version} > Released: {YYYY-MM-DD} ## Breaking Changes ## Highlights ## Improvements ## Fixes ## Upgrade Guide ## Contributors Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release! @username1, @username2, @username3
Omit empty sections except
Highlights, Improvements, and Fixes, which should usually exist.
The
Contributors section should always be included. List every person who authored
commits in the release range, @-mentioning them by their GitHub username (not their
real name or email). To find GitHub usernames:
- Extract usernames from merge commit messages:
— the branch prefix (e.g.git log v{last}..HEAD --oneline --merges
) gives the GitHub username.from username/branch - For noreply emails like
, the username is the part beforeuser@users.noreply.github.com
.@ - For contributors whose username is ambiguous, check
or the PR page.gh api users/{guess}
Never expose contributor email addresses. Use
@username only.
Exclude bot accounts (e.g.
lockfile-bot, dependabot) from the list. List contributors
in alphabetical order by GitHub username (case-insensitive).
Step 6 — Review Before Release
Before handing it off:
- confirm the heading is the stable version only
- confirm there is no
language in the title or filename-canary - confirm any breaking changes have an upgrade path
- present the draft for human sign-off
This skill never publishes anything. It only prepares the stable changelog artifact.