OpenSkillIndex← back to search
claude-code

Skillshub rr

코드 리뷰. 작업 후 변경사항을 Z.AI 모델로 검토하고, Codex가 결과를 다시 검증해 유효한 이슈만 정리한다. /rr 또는 'GLM 리뷰' 요청 시 사용.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/ComeOnOliver/skillshub
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/ComeOnOliver/skillshub "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/dgk-dev/dgk-gpt/rr" ~/.claude/skills/comeonoliver-skillshub-rr && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/dgk-dev/dgk-gpt/rr/SKILL.md
source content

/rr

Use 

glm-review
as a second reviewer for the current change set, then validate the reported issues against the actual code before you trust or repeat them.

Default Flow

  1. Determine the exact change scope first.
  • If the user points to a commit, prefer commit mode.
  • If the user says 
    staged
    , use staged mode.
  • If the user says 
    pr
    , use PR mode.
  • If the workspace has mixed unrelated changes, build a focused diff file for only the intended files.
  1. Run a quick connectivity check only when the environment looks suspect:
glm-review --health
  1. Run the review with the narrowest correct input:
glm-review
glm-review --mode staged
glm-review --mode pr
glm-review --mode commit --ref <COMMIT_HASH>
glm-review --diff-file /tmp/glm-review-diff.patch
  1. Treat the output as a candidate issue list, not ground truth.
  2. Re-open the referenced code and verify each claim.
  3. Report only valid issues, ordered by severity.
  4. If fixing issues is in scope, fix them and rerun the closest relevant verification.

Choosing Review Input

Prefer the most specific path that isolates the current task:

  • committed single change:
glm-review --mode commit --ref <COMMIT_HASH>
  • committed subset of files:
glm-review --mode commit --ref <COMMIT_HASH> --files src/a.ts src/b.ts
  • custom focused diff for multi-session or mixed worktrees:
GIT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$GIT_ROOT" && git diff HEAD -- <file1> <file2> ... > /tmp/glm-review-diff.patch
glm-review --diff-file /tmp/glm-review-diff.patch

If the diff is empty, stop and say there is nothing to review.

Validation Rules

  • Do not parrot 
    glm-review
    output without checking the code.
  • Drop false positives explicitly instead of forwarding them.
  • Distinguish between confirmed bugs, arguable style comments, and already-fixed issues.
  • If the review claims a regression, inspect the relevant file and the actual diff before accepting it.

Error Handling

Common fixes:

  • command not found: glm-review
    Install it with 
    npm install -g glm-review
  • ZAI_API_KEY not set
    Export 
    ZAI_API_KEY
    in the shell or your normal secret-loading path before rerunning
  • 401
    or auth failure Re-run 
    glm-review --health
    after refreshing credentials

Finish

Return:

  • review scope used
  • confirmed findings only
  • what was rejected as false positive, if anything material
  • what verification ran after fixes, if any