Some_claude_skills code-necromancer

Systematic framework for resurrecting and modernizing legacy codebases through archaeology, resurrection, and rejuvenation phases. Activate on "legacy code", "inherited codebase", "no documentation",

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/code-necromancer" ~/.claude/skills/curiositech-some-claude-skills-code-necromancer && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: .claude/skills/code-necromancer/SKILL.md
source content

Code Necromancer

Tagline: Raise dead codebases from the grave

Systematic framework for understanding, resurrecting, and modernizing legacy codebases.

When to Activate

Use when:

  • Inheriting a codebase with 5+ repos and no documentation
  • Resurrecting a product dormant for 2+ years
  • Joining a company with significant technical debt and tribal knowledge loss
  • Performing due diligence on acquired codebases
  • Modernizing legacy systems without breaking existing functionality

NOT for:

  • Greenfield projects (start fresh instead)
  • Well-documented active codebases
  • Simple bug fixes in maintained systems

The Three Phases

Phase 1: ARCHAEOLOGY

Objective: Create a complete map before touching anything.

OutputDescription
repo-inventory.json
All repos with metadata, languages, activity
dependency-graph.mmd
Inter-repo and external dependencies
architecture-diagram.mmd
Visual system topology
tech-stack-matrix.md
Language/framework versions per repo
maturity-assessment.md
Code quality, test coverage, docs quality
missing-pieces.md
Gaps, orphaned repos, broken integrations

Process: Inventory → Deep Scan → Cross-Reference → Visualize → Assess

→ See

references/archaeology-guide.md
for detailed techniques.

Phase 2: RESURRECTION

Objective: Get the system running in development.

OutputDescription
dependency-audit.md
Outdated packages, vulnerabilities, breaking changes
environment-variables.md
All required env vars with defaults
secrets-needed.md
API keys, certs, OAuth credentials
infrastructure-status.md
Cloud resources, what exists vs deleted
resurrection-blockers.md
Critical issues preventing launch
integration-tests/
Tests verifying components work and communicate

Process: Audit Dependencies → Map Environment → Check Infrastructure → Write Tests → Document Blockers

→ See

references/integration-test-patterns.md
for resurrection test patterns.

Phase 3: REJUVENATION

Objective: Modernize while maintaining feature parity.

OutputDescription
security-recommendations.md
Vulnerability fixes, compliance
modernization-roadmap.md
Prioritized upgrades with effort estimates
architecture-improvements.md
Scalability, performance, maintainability

Process: Security First → Infrastructure (containerize, CI/CD) → Code Quality → Architecture

Key Commands

# List all repos in org
gh repo list ORG --limit 1000 --json name,primaryLanguage,pushedAt

# Dependency analysis
npm audit && npm outdated      # Node.js
pip list --outdated && safety check  # Python
go mod graph                    # Go

# Find env vars in code
grep -rn 'process\.env\|os\.environ' --include="*.js" --include="*.py"

→ See

references/framework-detection.md
for framework/stack identification. → See
references/infrastructure-mapping.md
for cloud resource discovery. → See
references/dependency-patterns.md
for dependency detection.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

1. Premature Resurrection

What it looks like: Running

npm install
before reading any code Why it's wrong: You'll fix the same bug 5 times; dependencies have changed Fix: Complete archaeology first; understand before touching

2. Scope Creep

What it looks like: "Let's also refactor while we're here" Why it's wrong: Scope explosion; never actually resurrect Fix: Strict phase separation; refactoring is Phase 3

3. Big Bang Updates

What it looks like: Update all dependencies in one commit Why it's wrong: Something breaks, no idea what Fix: Update incrementally; test after each

4. Ignoring Tests

What it looks like: "It runs, ship it" Why it's wrong: Regression city; no baseline for changes Fix: Write resurrection tests as you go; they prove progress

5. Undocumented Changes

What it looks like: "I fixed it but forgot what I changed" Why it's wrong: Tribal knowledge returns; next person is you in 6 months Fix: Document everything you learn and change

6. Trusting Old Documentation

What it looks like: Following README from 2019 Why it's wrong: APIs change, services get deprecated Fix: Verify every instruction; documentation lies

Success Metrics

Archaeology Complete When:

  • All repos cataloged with metadata
  • Dependency graph visualized
  • Architecture diagram created
  • Core vs peripheral repos identified
  • Missing pieces documented

Resurrection Complete When:

  • All services start locally
  • Services can communicate with each other
  • Integration tests pass
  • At least one full user flow works

Rejuvenation Complete When:

  • No critical security vulnerabilities
  • All dependencies reasonably current
  • CI/CD pipeline working
  • Documentation current
  • Team can develop new features

References

references/archaeology-guide.md
- Deep code archaeology techniques →
references/dependency-patterns.md
- Dependency detection across ecosystems →
references/framework-detection.md
- Framework/stack identification →
references/infrastructure-mapping.md
- Cloud resource discovery →
references/integration-test-patterns.md
- Resurrection test patterns

Templates

templates/repo-inventory.json
- Repository catalog →
templates/archaeology-report.md
- Phase 1 output →
templates/resurrection-plan.md
- Phase 2 output →
templates/rejuvenation-roadmap.md
- Phase 3 output