Claude-code-java performance-smell-detection
Detect potential code-level performance smells in Java - streams, collections, boxing, regex, object creation. Provides awareness, not absolutes - always measure before optimizing. For JPA/database performance, use jpa-patterns instead.
git clone https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/performance-smell-detection" ~/.claude/skills/decebals-claude-code-java-performance-smell-detection && rm -rf "$T"
.claude/skills/performance-smell-detection/SKILL.mdPerformance Smell Detection Skill
Identify potential code-level performance issues in Java code.
Philosophy
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil" - Donald Knuth
This skill helps you notice potential performance smells, not blindly "fix" them. Modern JVMs (Java 21/25) are highly optimized. Always:
- Measure first - Use JMH, profilers, or production metrics
- Focus on hot paths - 90% of time spent in 10% of code
- Consider readability - Clear code often matters more than micro-optimizations
When to Use
- Reviewing performance-critical code paths
- Investigating measured performance issues
- Learning about Java performance patterns
- Code review with performance awareness
Scope
This skill: Code-level performance (streams, collections, objects) For database: Use
jpa-patterns skill (N+1, lazy loading, pagination)
For architecture: Use architecture-review skill
Quick Reference: Potential Smells
| Smell | Severity | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Regex compile in loop | 🔴 High | Always worth fixing |
| String concat in loop | 🟡 Medium | Still valid in Java 21/25 |
| Stream in tight loop | 🟡 Medium | Depends on collection size |
| Boxing in hot path | 🟡 Medium | Measure first |
| Unbounded collection | 🔴 High | Memory risk |
| Missing collection capacity | 🟢 Low | Minor, measure if critical |
String Operations (Java 9+ / 21 / 25)
What Changed
Since Java 9 (JEP 280), string concatenation with
+ uses invokedynamic, not StringBuilder. The JVM optimizes simple concatenation well.
Java 25 adds String::hashCode constant folding for additional optimization in Map lookups with String keys.
Still Valid: StringBuilder in Loops
// 🔴 Still problematic - new String each iteration String result = ""; for (String s : items) { result += s; // O(n²) - creates n strings } // ✅ StringBuilder for loops StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); for (String s : items) { sb.append(s); } String result = sb.toString(); // ✅ Or use String.join / Collectors.joining String result = String.join("", items);
Now Fine: Simple Concatenation
// ✅ Fine in Java 9+ - JVM optimizes this String message = "User " + name + " logged in at " + timestamp; // ✅ Also fine return "Error: " + code + " - " + description;
Avoid in Hot Paths: String.format
// 🟡 String.format has parsing overhead log.debug(String.format("Processing %s with id %d", name, id)); // ✅ Parameterized logging (SLF4J) log.debug("Processing {} with id {}", name, id);
Stream API (Nuanced View)
The Reality
Streams have overhead, but it's often acceptable:
- < 100 items: Streams can be 2-5x slower (but still microseconds)
- 1K-10K items: Difference narrows significantly
- > 10K items: Often within 50% of loops
- GraalVM: Can optimize streams to match loops
Recommendation: Prefer streams for readability. Optimize to loops only when profiling shows a bottleneck.
When Streams Are Problematic
// 🔴 Stream created per iteration in hot loop for (int i = 0; i < 1_000_000; i++) { boolean found = items.stream() .anyMatch(item -> item.getId() == i); } // ✅ Pre-compute lookup structure Set<Integer> itemIds = items.stream() .map(Item::getId) .collect(Collectors.toSet()); for (int i = 0; i < 1_000_000; i++) { boolean found = itemIds.contains(i); }
When Streams Are Fine
// ✅ Single pass, readable, not in tight loop List<String> names = users.stream() .filter(User::isActive) .map(User::getName) .sorted() .collect(Collectors.toList()); // ✅ Primitive streams avoid boxing int sum = numbers.stream() .mapToInt(Integer::intValue) .sum();
Parallel Streams: Use Carefully
// 🔴 Parallel on small collection - overhead > benefit smallList.parallelStream().map(...); // < 10K items // 🔴 Parallel with shared mutable state List<String> results = new ArrayList<>(); items.parallelStream() .forEach(results::add); // Race condition! // ✅ Parallel for CPU-intensive + large collections List<Result> results = largeDataset.parallelStream() // > 10K items .map(this::expensiveCpuComputation) .collect(Collectors.toList());
Boxing/Unboxing
Still a Real Issue
Boxing creates objects on heap, adds GC pressure. JVM caches small values (-128 to 127) but not larger ones.
Future: Project Valhalla will improve this significantly.
// 🔴 Boxing in tight loop - creates millions of objects Long sum = 0L; for (int i = 0; i < 1_000_000; i++) { sum += i; // Unbox, add, box } // ✅ Primitive long sum = 0L; for (int i = 0; i < 1_000_000; i++) { sum += i; }
Use Primitive Streams
// 🟡 Boxing overhead int sum = list.stream() .reduce(0, Integer::sum); // ✅ Primitive stream int sum = list.stream() .mapToInt(Integer::intValue) .sum();
Regex
Always Pre-compile in Loops
This advice is not outdated - Pattern.compile is expensive.
// 🔴 Compiles pattern every iteration for (String input : inputs) { if (input.matches("\\d{3}-\\d{4}")) { // Compiles regex! process(input); } } // ✅ Pre-compile private static final Pattern PHONE = Pattern.compile("\\d{3}-\\d{4}"); for (String input : inputs) { if (PHONE.matcher(input).matches()) { process(input); } }
Collections
Capacity Hint (Minor Optimization)
// 🟢 Low severity - but free optimization if size known List<User> users = new ArrayList<>(expectedSize); Map<String, User> map = new HashMap<>(expectedSize * 4 / 3 + 1);
Right Collection for the Job
// 🟡 O(n) lookup in loop List<String> allowed = getAllowed(); for (Request r : requests) { if (allowed.contains(r.getId())) { } // O(n) each time } // ✅ O(1) lookup Set<String> allowed = new HashSet<>(getAllowed()); for (Request r : requests) { if (allowed.contains(r.getId())) { } // O(1) }
Unbounded Collections
// 🔴 Memory risk - could grow unbounded @GetMapping("/users") public List<User> getAllUsers() { return userRepository.findAll(); // Millions of rows? } // ✅ Pagination @GetMapping("/users") public Page<User> getUsers(Pageable pageable) { return userRepository.findAll(pageable); }
Modern Java (21/25) Patterns
Virtual Threads for I/O (Java 21+)
// 🟡 Traditional thread pool for I/O - wastes OS threads ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(100); for (Request request : requests) { executor.submit(() -> callExternalApi(request)); // Blocks OS thread } // ✅ Virtual threads - millions of concurrent I/O operations try (ExecutorService executor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor()) { for (Request request : requests) { executor.submit(() -> callExternalApi(request)); } }
Structured Concurrency (Java 21+ Preview)
// ✅ Structured concurrency for parallel I/O try (StructuredTaskScope.ShutdownOnFailure scope = new StructuredTaskScope.ShutdownOnFailure()) { Future<User> user = scope.fork(() -> fetchUser(id)); Future<Orders> orders = scope.fork(() -> fetchOrders(id)); scope.join(); scope.throwIfFailed(); return new UserProfile(user.resultNow(), orders.resultNow()); }
Performance Review Checklist
🔴 High Severity (Usually Worth Fixing)
- Regex Pattern.compile in loops
- Unbounded queries without pagination
- String concatenation in loops (StringBuilder still valid)
- Parallel streams with shared mutable state
🟡 Medium Severity (Measure First)
- Streams in tight loops (>100K iterations)
- Boxing in hot paths
- List.contains() in loops (use Set)
- Traditional threads for I/O (consider Virtual Threads)
🟢 Low Severity (Nice to Have)
- Collection initial capacity
- Minor stream optimizations
- toArray(new T[0]) vs toArray(new T[size])
When NOT to Optimize
- Not a hot path - Setup code, config, admin endpoints
- No measured problem - "Looks slow" is not a measurement
- Readability suffers - Clear code > micro-optimization
- Small collections - 100 items processed in microseconds anyway
Analysis Commands
# Find regex in loops (potential compile overhead) grep -rn "\.matches(\|\.split(" --include="*.java" # Find potential boxing (Long/Integer as variables) grep -rn "Long\s\|Integer\s\|Double\s" --include="*.java" | grep "= 0\|+=" # Find ArrayList without capacity grep -rn "new ArrayList<>()" --include="*.java" # Find findAll without pagination grep -rn "findAll()" --include="*.java"