Awesome-omni-skill a11y-debugging
Uses Chrome DevTools MCP for accessibility (a11y) debugging and auditing based on web.dev guidelines. Use when testing semantic HTML, ARIA labels, focus states, keyboard navigation, tap targets, and color contrast.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/development/a11y-debugging" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skill-a11y-debugging && rm -rf "$T"
skills/development/a11y-debugging/SKILL.mdCore Concepts
Accessibility Tree vs DOM: Visually hiding an element (e.g.,
CSS opacity: 0) behaves differently for screen readers than display: none or aria-hidden="true". The take_snapshot tool returns the accessibility tree of the page, which represents what assistive technologies "see", making it the most reliable source of truth for semantic structure.
Reading web.dev documentation: If you need to research specific accessibility guidelines (like
https://web.dev/articles/accessible-tap-targets), you can append .md.txt to the URL (e.g., https://web.dev/articles/accessible-tap-targets.md.txt) to fetch the clean, raw markdown version. This is much easier to read!
Workflow Patterns
1. Automated Audit (Lighthouse)
Start by running a Lighthouse accessibility audit to get a comprehensive baseline. This tool provides a high-level score and lists specific failing elements with remediation advice.
- Run the audit:
- Set
tomode
to refresh the page and capture load issues."navigation" - Set
(e.g.,outputDirPath
) to save the full JSON report./tmp/lh-report
- Set
- Analyze the Summary:
- Check
(0-1 scale). A score < 1 indicates violations.scores - Review
count.audits.failed
- Check
- Review the Report (CRITICAL):
- Parsing: Do not read the entire file line-by-line. Use a CLI tool like
or a Node.js one-liner to filter for failures:jq# Extract failing audits with their details node -e "const r=require('./report.json'); Object.values(r.audits).filter(a=>a.score!==null && a.score<1).forEach(a=>console.log(JSON.stringify({id:a.id, title:a.title, items:a.details?.items})))" - This efficiently extracts the
andselector
of failing elements without loading the full report into context.snippet
- Parsing: Do not read the entire file line-by-line. Use a CLI tool like
2. Browser Issues & Audits
Chrome automatically checks for common accessibility problems. Use
list_console_messages to check for these native audits:
:types["issue"]
:includePreservedMessages
(to catch issues that occurred during page load)true
This often reveals missing labels, invalid ARIA attributes, and other critical errors without manual investigation.
3. Semantics & Structure
The accessibility tree exposes the heading hierarchy and semantic landmarks.
- Navigate to the page.
- Use
to capture the accessibility tree.take_snapshot - Check Heading Levels: Ensure heading levels (
,h1
,h2
, etc.) are logical and do not skip levels. The snapshot will include heading roles.h3 - Content Reordering: Verify that the DOM order (which drives the accessibility tree) matches the visual reading order. Use
to inspect the visual layout and compare it against the snapshot structure to catch CSS floats or absolute positioning that jumbles the logical flow.take_screenshot
4. Labels, Forms & Text Alternatives
- Locate buttons, inputs, and images in the
output.take_snapshot - Ensure interactive elements have an accessible name (e.g., a button should not just say
if it only contains an icon)."" - Orphaned Inputs: Verify that all form inputs have associated labels. Use
to check for inputs missingevaluate_script
(forid
) orlabel[for]
:aria-label() => Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('input, select, textarea')) .filter(i => { const hasId = i.id && document.querySelector(`label[for="${i.id}"]`); const hasAria = i.getAttribute('aria-label') || i.getAttribute('aria-labelledby'); return !hasId && !hasAria && !i.closest('label'); }) .map(i => ({ tag: i.tagName, id: i.id, name: i.name, placeholder: i.placeholder, }));
4. Check images for `alt` text. ### 5. Focus & Keyboard Navigation Testing "keyboard traps" and proper focus management without visual feedback relies on tracking the focused element. 1. Use the `press_key` tool with `"Tab"` or `"Shift+Tab"` to move focus. 2. Use `take_snapshot` to capture the updated accessibility tree. 3. Locate the element marked as focused in the snapshot to verify focus moved to the expected interactive element. 4. If a modal opens, focus must move into the modal and "trap" within it until closed. ### 6. Tap Targets and Visuals According to web.dev, tap targets should be at least 48x48 pixels with sufficient spacing. Since the accessibility tree doesn't show sizes, use `evaluate_script`: ```js // Usage in console: copy, paste, and call with element: fn(element) el => { const rect = el.getBoundingClientRect(); return {width: rect.width, height: rect.height}; };
Pass the element's
from the snapshot as an argument to uid
.evaluate_script
7. Color Contrast
To verify color contrast ratios, start by checking for native accessibility issues:
- Call
withlist_console_messages
.types: ["issue"] - Look for "Low Contrast" issues in the output.
If native audits do not report issues (which may happen in some headless environments) or if you need to check a specific element manually, you can use the following script as a fallback approximation.
Note: This script uses a simplified algorithm and may not account for transparency, gradients, or background images. For production-grade auditing, consider injecting
axe-core.
el => { function getRGB(colorStr) { const match = colorStr.match(/rgba?\((\d+),\s*(\d+),\s*(\d+)/); return match ? [parseInt(match[1]), parseInt(match[2]), parseInt(match[3])] : [255, 255, 255]; } function luminance(r, g, b) { const a = [r, g, b].map(function (v) { v /= 255; return v <= 0.03928 ? v / 12.92 : Math.pow((v + 0.055) / 1.055, 2.4); }); return a[0] * 0.2126 + a[1] * 0.7152 + a[2] * 0.0722; } const style = window.getComputedStyle(el); const fg = getRGB(style.color); let bg = getRGB(style.backgroundColor); // Basic contrast calculation (Note: Doesn't account for transparency over background images) const l1 = luminance(fg[0], fg[1], fg[2]); const l2 = luminance(bg[0], bg[1], bg[2]); const ratio = (Math.max(l1, l2) + 0.05) / (Math.min(l1, l2) + 0.05); return { color: style.color, bg: style.backgroundColor, contrastRatio: ratio.toFixed(2), }; };
Pass the element's
to test the contrast against WCAG AA (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text).uid
8. Global Page Checks
Verify document-level accessibility settings often missed in component testing:
() => ({ lang: document.documentElement.lang || 'MISSING - Screen readers need this for pronunciation', title: document.title || 'MISSING - Required for context', viewport: document.querySelector('meta[name="viewport"]')?.content || 'MISSING - Check for user-scalable=no (bad practice)', reducedMotion: window.matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)').matches ? 'Enabled' : 'Disabled', });
Troubleshooting
If standard a11y queries fail or the
evaluate_script snippets return unexpected results:
- Visual Inspection: If automated scripts cannot determine contrast (e.g., text over gradient images or complex backgrounds), use
to capture the element. While models cannot measure exact contrast ratios from images, they can visually assess legibility and identifying obvious issues.take_screenshot