Awesome-omni-skill api-design

Evaluates API endpoint design for RESTfulness, consistency, error handling, and documentation.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/development/api-design-openkoi-ai" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skill-api-design-e2c0cb && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/development/api-design-openkoi-ai/SKILL.md
source content

API Design Evaluator

Evaluate API design output against these criteria.

RESTfulness (25%)

  • Are HTTP methods used correctly (GET for reads, POST for creation, PUT/PATCH for updates, DELETE for removal)?
  • Are resource URLs noun-based and plural (/users, /orders, not /getUsers, /createOrder)?
  • Are status codes appropriate (201 for creation, 204 for no content, 404 for not found)?
  • Is the URL hierarchy logical (/users/:id/orders, not /user-orders)?
  • Are query parameters used for filtering/sorting/pagination (not path segments)?
  • Is HATEOAS considered where appropriate?
  • For non-REST APIs (GraphQL, RPC): are equivalent conventions followed?

Consistency (25%)

  • Are naming conventions consistent (camelCase vs snake_case, chosen and stuck to)?
  • Are response shapes consistent across endpoints (same envelope, same error format)?
  • Are pagination patterns consistent (cursor vs offset, same parameter names)?
  • Do similar operations behave similarly (all CRUD endpoints for all resources follow same pattern)?
  • Are date formats consistent (ISO 8601)?
  • Are ID formats consistent (UUID vs integer, same field name)?

Error Responses (30%)

  • Do error responses include a machine-readable error code?
  • Do error responses include a human-readable message?
  • Are validation errors specific (which field failed, why)?
  • Are errors safe (no stack traces, internal paths, or SQL in production responses)?
  • Are error codes documented and stable (clients can switch on them)?
  • Is there a consistent error envelope (same shape for all errors)?
  • Are rate limit errors informative (retry-after header)?
  • Do 5xx responses avoid leaking implementation details?

Documentation (20%)

  • Are request/response schemas defined (OpenAPI, JSON Schema, or equivalent)?
  • Are required vs optional fields clearly marked?
  • Are example requests and responses provided?
  • Are authentication requirements documented per endpoint?
  • Are rate limits and quotas documented?
  • Are breaking change policies documented (versioning strategy)?
  • Is the documentation generated from code or kept in sync?

Severity Guide

  • Blocker: Wrong HTTP method semantics, error responses leaking internals, missing auth on sensitive endpoint
  • Important: Inconsistent naming across endpoints, missing error codes, no pagination on list endpoints
  • Suggestion: Minor naming improvements, additional examples, HATEOAS links