Deep Review Skill

Run a comprehensive deep review using a team of specialized agents covering architecture, code quality, error handling, types, comments, tests, accessibility, localization, concurrency, performance, and simplification.

When to Use

• Before creating or merging a PR
• After completing a feature branch
• For thorough code quality assessment
• To identify technical debt and architectural issues
• When you want a complete picture of code health

Issue Classification

When reviewing PR changes, all issues are classified as:

• [NEW]: Issues in code added or modified by this PR. These must be addressed before merge.
• [PRE-EXISTING]: Issues in code not changed by this PR. These are technical debt observations that should not block the PR but are valuable to track.

This distinction helps reviewers focus on what's actionable for the current PR while still surfacing important context about surrounding code quality.

Scope Detection

Determine the analysis scope from flags or arguments:

1. If

   --pr

   or

   --branch

   flag provided:
   • Detect base branch: check for

     main

     , then

     master

     , or use

     git merge-base

   • Run

     git diff --name-only <base>...HEAD

     to get all files changed in this branch
   • Analyze those files and their immediate dependencies

2. If

   --changes

   flag provided:
   • Run

     git diff --name-only HEAD

     and

     git diff --name-only --cached

     for uncommitted changes
   • Analyze those files and their immediate dependencies

3. If path argument provided (e.g.,

   /deep-review src/features

   ):
   • Analyze only that path

4. If no arguments:

   • Default to

     --pr

     behavior (analyze current branch changes)

Review Aspects

Select which aspects to review. Default is

core

code

errors

arch

types

comments

tests

simplify

a11y

l10n

concurrency

perf

core

full

Platform-specific aspects (automatically included when relevant, or explicitly requested):

ios

android

ts-frontend

ts-backend

python

rust

go

rails

flutter

java

dotnet

php

cpp

react-native

svelte

elixir

kotlin-server

scala

macos

nextjs

vue

django

ruby

terraform

shell

angular

docker

kubernetes

graphql

github-actions

sql

swift-data

mobile

ts

jvm

apple

infra

containers

Platform reviewers are automatically included when the team lead determines they are relevant based on the changed files and project context. For example, changing

.swift

.swift

.kt

.py

.vue

.sql

/deep-review ios

core

full

Usage examples:

/deep-review                    # core review of PR changes (+ auto-detected platforms)
/deep-review --pr               # explicit PR scope (+ auto-detected platforms)
/deep-review --changes          # uncommitted changes only (+ auto-detected platforms)
/deep-review full --pr          # all cross-cutting agents on PR (+ auto-detected platforms)
/deep-review code errors        # specific aspects only (+ auto-detected platforms)
/deep-review types tests --pr   # type and test analysis of PR (+ auto-detected platforms)
/deep-review a11y --pr          # accessibility audit of PR
/deep-review l10n --pr          # localization review of PR
/deep-review concurrency --pr   # concurrency analysis of PR
/deep-review perf --pr          # performance analysis of PR
/deep-review ios --pr           # explicitly include iOS reviewer
/deep-review apple --pr         # iOS + macOS reviewers
/deep-review ts --pr            # both TypeScript frontend + backend reviewers
/deep-review mobile --pr        # iOS + Android reviewers
/deep-review nextjs --pr        # Next.js reviewer (Server Components, App Router)
/deep-review vue --pr           # Vue.js reviewer (Composition API, Nuxt)
/deep-review django --pr        # Django reviewer (ORM, DRF, migrations)
/deep-review angular --pr       # Angular reviewer (RxJS, DI, change detection)
/deep-review containers --pr    # Docker + Kubernetes reviewers
/deep-review graphql --pr       # GraphQL reviewer (schema, resolvers, security)
/deep-review infra --pr         # Terraform + Shell reviewers
/deep-review python rust --pr   # explicitly include Python and Rust reviewers
/deep-review sql --pr           # SQL reviewer (queries, schema, migrations, injection)
/deep-review swift-data --pr    # Swift Data reviewer (SwiftData, Core Data, GRDB)
/deep-review src/features       # analyze specific path (+ auto-detected platforms)

Agent Dispatch Table

All agents use

subagent_type: "general-purpose"

Instructions

Phase 1: Determine Scope

1. Parse arguments to extract:

   • Scope flag:

     --pr

     ,

     --branch

     ,

     --changes

     , or path
   • Aspects: list of aspects or

     core

     /

     full

2. Get changed files based on scope:

   # For --pr/--branch (detect base branch first)
   BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null || echo "HEAD~10")
   git diff --name-only $BASE...HEAD
   
   # For --changes
   git diff --name-only HEAD
   git diff --name-only --cached
   

3. Get detailed diff with line numbers (for distinguishing new vs pre-existing issues):

   # Get the unified diff showing which lines were added/modified
   git diff $BASE...HEAD --unified=0 | grep -E '^@@|^diff --git'
   

   This output shows the exact line ranges that were changed. Parse it to build a map of

   {file: [changed_line_ranges]}

   .

4. Build the scope context string (referred to as

   SCOPE_CONTEXT

   below):

   SCOPE: Focus analysis on these files and their direct dependencies:
   {list of changed files}
   
   CHANGED LINE RANGES (for classifying issues):
   {file1}: lines {start1}-{end1}, {start2}-{end2}, ...
   {file2}: lines {start1}-{end1}, ...
   
   IMPORTANT - Issue Classification:
   When reporting issues, you MUST classify each issue as one of:
   - **[NEW]**: Issue is in code that was ADDED or MODIFIED in this PR (within the changed line ranges above)
   - **[PRE-EXISTING]**: Issue is in code that was NOT changed by this PR (outside the changed line ranges)
   
   This distinction is critical for PR review. New issues should be fixed before merge.
   Pre-existing issues are technical debt to track but should not block the PR.
   

Phase 1.5: Determine Platform Reviewers

After obtaining the list of changed files, determine which platform-specific reviewers to include. Available platform reviewers and what they cover:

ios

macos

android

ts-frontend

ts-backend

nextjs

vue

python

django

ruby

rust

go

rails

flutter

java

dotnet

php

cpp

react-native

svelte

elixir

kotlin-server

scala

terraform

shell

angular

docker

kubernetes

graphql

github-actions

sql

swift-data

If the user explicitly requested platform aspects (e.g.,

/deep-review ios

/deep-review python rust

If the user did not request any platform aspects, look at the changed files and the project context to decide which platform reviewers are relevant. Use your judgment — examine file extensions, imports, build files, and project structure to determine the right reviewers. Be precise:

.swift

.kt

.ts

ts-backend

ts-frontend

.vue

vue

ts-frontend

next.config.*

nextjs

settings.py

manage.py

django

.tf

terraform

.sh

.bash

shell

angular.json

angular

Dockerfile

docker-compose.yml

docker

apiVersion

kind

kubernetes

.graphql

.gql

graphql

.github/workflows/*.yml

github-actions

.sql

sql

import SwiftData

.xcdatamodeld

import GRDB

swift-data

sql

sql

Group alias expansion:

• mobile

  →

  ios

  ,

  android

• ts

  →

  ts-frontend

  ,

  ts-backend

• jvm

  →

  java

  ,

  kotlin-server

  ,

  scala

• apple

  →

  ios

  ,

  macos

• infra

  →

  terraform

  ,

  shell

• containers

  →

  docker

  ,

  kubernetes

Merge behavior:

• Platform aspects are added to whatever cross-cutting aspects the user requested
• Platform aspects are never included in

  core

  or

  full

  expansion — they only come from auto-detection or explicit request
• Deduplicate: if auto-detection finds

  ts-frontend

  and the user also typed

  ts

  , only include

  ts-frontend

  once

Phase 2: Determine Which Agents to Launch

Based on selected aspects (including any auto-detected platform aspects from Phase 1.5):

core

full

code

errors

arch

types

comments

tests

simplify

a11y

l10n

concurrency

perf

ios

macos

android

ts-frontend

ts-backend

nextjs

vue

python

django

ruby

rust

go

rails

flutter

java

dotnet

php

cpp

react-native

svelte

elixir

kotlin-server

scala

terraform

shell

angular

docker

kubernetes

graphql

github-actions

sql

swift-data

Phase 3: Create Results Directory and Launch Background Agents

1. Create results directory:

   mkdir -p /tmp/deep-review-$(uuidgen | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')/
   

   Store the path as

   REVIEW_DIR

   .

2. Spawn all analysis agents in parallel as background tasks: Use a single message with multiple Task tool calls (one per agent) so they all launch concurrently:

   • subagent_type

     :

     "general-purpose"

   • model

     : from dispatch table (

     opus

     or omit for inherit)

   • run_in_background

     :

     true

   • prompt

     : use the Agent Prompt Template below, filled in with the agent's details
   • Do NOT use

     team_name

     or

     name

     — these are standalone background agents, NOT team members

   Each Task call returns immediately with a

   task_id

   . Store the mapping of

   {agent-id → task_id}

   .

Phase 4: Wait for Completion and Collect Results

1. Poll for output files using a bash loop (keeps context minimal compared to reading TaskOutput for every agent):

   # Wait until all expected output files exist (poll interval: 5s)
   EXPECTED_FILES=("{agent-id-1}.md" "{agent-id-2}.md" ...)
   TIMEOUT=600; ELAPSED=0
   while [ $ELAPSED -lt $TIMEOUT ]; do
     ALL_DONE=true
     for f in "${EXPECTED_FILES[@]}"; do
       [ ! -f "{REVIEW_DIR}/$f" ] && ALL_DONE=false && break
     done
     $ALL_DONE && break
     sleep 5; ELAPSED=$((ELAPSED + 5))
   done
   

   Adapt the file list and REVIEW_DIR to actual values.

2. If the timeout expires with missing files: For each missing agent, call

   TaskOutput

   with

   block: false

   using the stored

   task_id

   to check whether the agent is still running or has failed. If still running, continue waiting (repeat the poll loop). If failed, record it in the gap report and move on.

3. After all agents have completed (or been recorded as failed), check which output files exist.

4. Build a gap report string listing any agents that failed to produce output.

Phase 5: Launch Synthesis Agent

1. Spawn the synthesis agent (as a background task to minimize context):

   • subagent_type

     :

     "general-purpose"

   • run_in_background

     :

     true

   • prompt

     : Include the following in the prompt:
     • Path to the synthesis instructions file:

       agents/synthesizer.md

     • The

       REVIEW_DIR

       path
     • The list of expected output files (one per agent that was launched)
     • The gap report (if any agents failed)
     • The scope description (for the report header)
     • Instruction to write the final report to

       {REVIEW_DIR}/REPORT.md

   Store the returned

   task_id

   for the synthesis agent.

2. Wait for completion using

   TaskOutput

   with

   block: true

   and

   timeout: 600000

   (10 minutes) on the synthesis

   task_id

   . This blocks until the agent actually finishes — no arbitrary timeout guessing. The returned output can be ignored; the report is in the file.

Phase 6: Present Report

1. Read the report: Read

   {REVIEW_DIR}/REPORT.md

   and present its contents to the user
2. Inform the user: Let them know individual agent findings are available at

   {REVIEW_DIR}/

   for detailed inspection

Agent Prompt Template

This is the standardized prompt given to each analysis agent. Fill in the placeholders before sending.

You are a specialized code analysis agent.

## Your Task

1. Read your analysis instructions from: {AGENT_FILE_PATH}
   (This is relative to the skill directory. Use the Read tool to read the file.)
2. Analyze the code following those instructions
3. Write your complete findings to: {OUTPUT_FILE_PATH}

## Scope Context

{SCOPE_CONTEXT}

Note: Your analysis instructions reference `{SCOPE_CONTEXT}`.
This refers to the Scope Context provided directly above — use it as-is.

## Output File Format

Write your findings as a markdown file. Start with a heading identifying the agent,
then list all findings using the output format specified in your analysis instructions.

## Classification Rules

When classifying issues as [NEW] or [PRE-EXISTING], use the changed line ranges
provided in the Scope Context above. Issues in changed lines are [NEW]; all others
are [PRE-EXISTING].

## Error Handling

If you encounter errors during analysis (e.g., files not found, permission issues):
- Write partial findings to the output file along with an ERROR section describing what went wrong

## Important

- Do NOT modify any source code files — this is a READ-ONLY analysis
- Write your findings ONLY to the output file path specified above
- Be thorough but focused — quality over quantity

Tips

• Run

  /deep-review --pr

  before creating a PR to catch issues early
• Use

  core

  (default) for quick essential checks
• Use

  full

  for comprehensive review before major merges
• Focus on [NEW] issues - these must be fixed before merge
• [PRE-EXISTING] issues are technical debt to track, not PR blockers
• Re-run after fixes to verify resolution
• Use specific aspects (e.g.,

  types tests

  ) when you know the concern
• Platform reviewers are automatically included when relevant — no need to specify them manually
• Use

  mobile

  ,

  ts

  , or explicit platform names (e.g.,

  ios

  ,

  python

  ) to force specific platform reviewers
• Create follow-up tickets for critical pre-existing issues discovered during review
• Individual agent findings are available in

  /tmp/deep-review-*/

  for detailed inspection
• Agents run as background tasks (not tmux-style teams) — the primary session's context stays minimal