Awesome-omni-skill go-functional-options

The functional options pattern for Go constructors and public APIs. Use when designing APIs with optional configuration, especially with 3+ parameters.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/development/go-functional-options-majiayu000" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skill-go-functional-options-dabed1 && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/development/go-functional-options-majiayu000/SKILL.md
source content

Functional Options Pattern

Source: Uber Go Style Guide

Functional options is a pattern where you declare an opaque

Option
type that records information in an internal struct. The constructor accepts a variadic number of these options and applies them to configure the result.

When to Use

Use functional options when:

  • 3+ optional arguments on constructors or public APIs
  • Extensible APIs that may gain new options over time
  • Clean caller experience is important (no need to pass defaults)

The Pattern

Core Components

  1. Unexported
    options
    struct
    - holds all configuration
  2. Exported
    Option
    interface
    - with unexported
    apply
    method
  3. Option types - implement the interface
  4. With*
    constructors
    - create options

Option Interface

type Option interface {
    apply(*options)
}

The unexported

apply
method ensures only options from this package can be used.

Complete Implementation

Source: Uber Go Style Guide

package db

import "go.uber.org/zap"

// options holds all configuration for opening a connection.
type options struct {
    cache  bool
    logger *zap.Logger
}

// Option configures how we open the connection.
type Option interface {
    apply(*options)
}

// cacheOption implements Option for cache setting (simple type alias).
type cacheOption bool

func (c cacheOption) apply(opts *options) {
    opts.cache = bool(c)
}

// WithCache enables or disables caching.
func WithCache(c bool) Option {
    return cacheOption(c)
}

// loggerOption implements Option for logger setting (struct for pointers).
type loggerOption struct {
    Log *zap.Logger
}

func (l loggerOption) apply(opts *options) {
    opts.logger = l.Log
}

// WithLogger sets the logger for the connection.
func WithLogger(log *zap.Logger) Option {
    return loggerOption{Log: log}
}

// Open creates a connection.
func Open(addr string, opts ...Option) (*Connection, error) {
    // Start with defaults
    options := options{
        cache:  defaultCache,
        logger: zap.NewNop(),
    }

    // Apply all provided options
    for _, o := range opts {
        o.apply(&options)
    }

    // Use options.cache and options.logger...
    return &Connection{}, nil
}

Usage Examples

Source: Uber Go Style Guide

Without Functional Options (Bad)

// Caller must always provide all parameters, even defaults
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, log)
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, log)

With Functional Options (Good)

// Only provide options when needed
db.Open(addr)
db.Open(addr, db.WithLogger(log))
db.Open(addr, db.WithCache(false))
db.Open(
    addr,
    db.WithCache(false),
    db.WithLogger(log),
)

Comparison: Functional Options vs Config Struct

AspectFunctional OptionsConfig Struct
ExtensibilityAdd new
With*
functions
Add new fields (may break)
DefaultsBuilt into constructorZero values or separate defaults
Caller experienceOnly specify what differsMust construct entire struct
TestabilityOptions are comparableStruct comparison
ComplexityMore boilerplateSimpler setup

Prefer Config Struct when: Fewer than 3 options, options rarely change, all options usually specified together, or internal APIs only.

Why Not Closures?

Source: Uber Go Style Guide

An alternative implementation uses closures:

// Closure approach (not recommended)
type Option func(*options)

func WithCache(c bool) Option {
    return func(o *options) { o.cache = c }
}

The interface approach is preferred because:

  1. Testability - Options can be compared in tests and mocks
  2. Debuggability - Options can implement
    fmt.Stringer
  3. Flexibility - Options can implement additional interfaces
  4. Visibility - Option types are visible in documentation

Quick Reference

// 1. Unexported options struct with defaults
type options struct {
    field1 Type1
    field2 Type2
}

// 2. Exported Option interface, unexported method
type Option interface {
    apply(*options)
}

// 3. Option type + apply + With* constructor
type field1Option Type1

func (o field1Option) apply(opts *options) { opts.field1 = Type1(o) }
func WithField1(v Type1) Option            { return field1Option(v) }

// 4. Constructor applies options over defaults
func New(required string, opts ...Option) (*Thing, error) {
    o := options{field1: defaultField1, field2: defaultField2}
    for _, opt := range opts {
        opt.apply(&o)
    }
    // ...
}

Checklist

  • options
    struct is unexported
  • Option
    interface has unexported
    apply
    method
  • Each option has a
    With*
    constructor
  • Defaults are set before applying options
  • Required parameters are separate from
    ...Option

See Also