Awesome-omni-skill moai-cc-claude-md
Authoring CLAUDE.md Project Instructions. Design project-specific AI guidance, document workflows, define architecture patterns. Use when creating CLAUDE.md files for projects, documenting team standards, or establishing AI collaboration guidelines.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data-ai/moai-cc-claude-md-kivo360" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skill-moai-cc-claude-md && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data-ai/moai-cc-claude-md-kivo360/SKILL.mdSkill Metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Version | 1.0.0 |
| Tier | Ops |
| Auto-load | When authoring CLAUDE.md files |
What It Does
프로젝트별 CLAUDE.md 파일 작성을 위한 표준 구조와 패턴을 제공합니다. AI 협업 가이드라인, 워크플로우 문서화, 아키텍처 패턴 정의 방법을 다룹니다.
When to Use
- 새 프로젝트의 CLAUDE.md 파일을 생성할 때
- 기존 CLAUDE.md를 업데이트하거나 개선할 때
- 팀 표준 및 개발 워크플로우를 문서화할 때
- AI 협업 패턴을 정의할 때
Authoring CLAUDE.md Project Instructions
CLAUDE.md is a Markdown file that provides Claude with project-specific context, workflows, standards, and guidance. It acts as a living document for AI collaboration patterns.
CLAUDE.md File Location & Purpose
Location:
./{PROJECT_ROOT}/CLAUDE.md or /~/.claude/CLAUDE.md (personal)
Purpose: Tell Claude about your project before every session starts.
Core Sections
Section 1: Project Overview
# Project Name **Description**: What does this project do? **Repository**: GitHub URL **Tech Stack**: Technologies, languages, frameworks **Team**: Size, roles **Status**: Active, archived, experimental
Section 2: Core Workflow
## Development Workflow ### Phase 1: Planning - Use `/alfred:1-plan` for SPEC creation - EARS syntax: Ubiquitous, Event-driven, State-driven, Optional, Constraints - Store in `.moai/specs/` ### Phase 2: Implementation (TDD) - RED: Write failing tests - GREEN: Minimal implementation - REFACTOR: Improve quality - Tools: pytest, TypeScript, mypy, ruff ### Phase 3: Sync & Documentation - Run `/alfred:3-sync` to validate - Update Living Documents - Verify @TAG chains - Prepare PR
Section 3: Code Standards
## Code Standards (TRUST 5 Principles) ### T - Test First - Target coverage: ≥ 85% - Framework: pytest for Python, Jest for TypeScript - Pattern: TDD (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR) ### R - Readable - Max file: 300 LOC - Max function: 50 LOC - Max params: 5 - Use linters: ruff (Python), ESLint (TypeScript) ### U - Unified - Type safety: mypy for Python, TypeScript strict mode - Consistent patterns across domain - Shared utilities in `src/core/` ### S - Secured - Input validation everywhere - No hardcoded secrets - Use environment variables - Run: bandit (Python), npm audit ### T - Trackable - @TAG system: @SPEC:ID, @TEST:ID, @CODE:ID, @DOC:ID - Document all changes in HISTORY section - Link code to SPEC requirements
Section 4: Project Architecture
## Architecture ### Directory Structure
src/ ├── core/ # Shared utilities, domain models ├── domain/ # Business logic, DOMAIN-specific ├── interfaces/ # API endpoints, CLI commands ├── middleware/ # Cross-cutting concerns └── infra/ # Database, external services
tests/ ├── unit/ # Unit tests for core/ and domain/ ├── integration/ # API, database tests └── e2e/ # End-to-end workflows
### Key Design Decisions - Monolithic backend (for now) - Database: PostgreSQL with migrations - Authentication: JWT tokens - API: REST with OpenAPI docs
Section 5: AI Collaboration Patterns
## Working with Claude Code ### When to Use Sub-agents - `debug-helper`: Errors, test failures, exceptions - `security-auditor`: Vulnerability assessment, OWASP checks - `architect`: Refactoring, system design, scalability - `code-reviewer`: Quality analysis, SOLID violations ### Commands Available - `/alfred:1-plan "feature description"` — Create SPEC - `/alfred:2-run SPEC-ID` — Implement (TDD) - `/alfred:3-sync` — Sync docs and validate - `/review-code src/**/*.ts` — Code review - `/deploy [env]` — Deploy pipeline ### Context Engineering Tips - Always mention relevant SPEC ID - Provide file paths relative to project root - Link to similar existing features - Mention constraints or non-negotiables upfront
Section 6: Known Gotchas & Decisions
## Important Notes ### Why We Use SPEC-First - Clarifies requirements upfront - Prevents scope creep - Enables parallel work (different SPECs) - Makes code changes traceable ### Common Mistakes to Avoid - ❌ Implementing without SPEC - ❌ Skipping tests for "quick" fixes - ❌ Mixing multiple features in one PR - ❌ Ignoring @TAG system ### Team Decisions - Use pytest fixtures for mocking (not monkeypatch) - All API responses must include status codes - Database migrations are CI/CD blocking - Security audit runs on every PR
CLAUDE.md Examples by Domain
Example 1: Web API Project
# Transaction API **Tech Stack**: Python (FastAPI), PostgreSQL, pytest ## Phase Workflow 1. **SPEC**: Requirements in EARS syntax - Example: `The API must validate transaction amounts > 0` - Stored in: `.moai/specs/SPEC-TRANS-{###}/spec.md` 2. **TDD**: Implement with test-first approach - Tests: `tests/integration/test_transactions.py` - Code: `src/domain/transaction.py` 3. **Sync**: Verify completeness - Run: `/alfred:3-sync` - Check: TAG chain integrity
Example 2: React Frontend Project
# Competition Dashboard **Tech Stack**: TypeScript, React 19, Vitest, Tailwind ## Development Standards - Framework: Next.js 15 (App Router) - Testing: Vitest + React Testing Library - Styling: Tailwind CSS with shadcn/ui - State: Zustand for client state, Server Components for data ## Key Patterns - Server Components for data fetching - Suspense boundaries for loading states - Error boundaries for graceful failures
High-Freedom: Architectural Decisions
## Why This Architecture? ### Monolith vs Microservices - **Chosen**: Monolithic backend - **Reason**: Team < 10, throughput manageable - **When to reconsider**: >10M requests/month or 3+ teams ### Database: PostgreSQL - **Reason**: Strong ACID guarantees, mature ecosystem - **Alternatives considered**: MongoDB (rejected: unclear schema)
Medium-Freedom: Workflow Definition
## Code Review Checklist Before merging, reviewer must verify: 1. [ ] SPEC ID linked in PR description 2. [ ] All tests passing (>85% coverage) 3. [ ] No security issues (bandit clean) 4. [ ] Code follows TRUST 5 principles 5. [ ] @TAG chain complete (@SPEC → @TEST → @CODE → @DOC) 6. [ ] CHANGELOG updated
Low-Freedom: Explicit Rules
## Non-negotiable Rules - ❌ No commits without @TAG references - ❌ No merging PRs without passing tests - ❌ No pushing secrets to repo - ❌ No force-pushing to main/master - ✅ All features must have SPEC document - ✅ All code changes must have corresponding tests - ✅ All SPECs must use EARS syntax
Validation Checklist
- Project name and description clear
- Tech stack documented
- Development workflow defined (Plan → Run → Sync)
- TRUST 5 principles explained
- Architecture diagram or structure described
- AI collaboration patterns defined
- Known gotchas documented
- Examples provided for key workflows
Best Practices
✅ DO:
- Keep CLAUDE.md up-to-date as standards evolve
- Include real examples (links to actual files/PRs)
- Document why (not just what)
- Link to external docs (architecture decisions, security policy)
- Review with team before finalizing
❌ DON'T:
- Explain general programming concepts (Claude already knows)
- List every possible workflow (focus on your specific patterns)
- Write as instruction to humans (write as guidance to Claude)
- Update CLAUDE.md only at project start (evolve as needed)
Reference: Claude Code CLAUDE.md documentation Version: 1.0.0