Awesome-omni-skill mvvm-architecture
Expert MVVM decisions for iOS/tvOS: choosing between ViewModel patterns (state enum vs published properties vs Combine), service layer boundaries, dependency injection strategies, and testing approaches. Use when designing ViewModel architecture, debugging data flow issues, or deciding where business logic belongs. Trigger keywords: MVVM, ViewModel, ObservableObject, @StateObject, service layer, dependency injection, unit test, mock, architecture
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data-ai/mvvm-architecture" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skill-mvvm-architecture && rm -rf "$T"
skills/data-ai/mvvm-architecture/SKILL.mdMVVM Architecture — Expert Decisions
Expert decision frameworks for MVVM choices in iOS/tvOS. Claude knows MVVM basics — this skill provides judgment calls for non-obvious decisions.
Decision Trees
ViewModel Pattern Selection
Does the screen have distinct, mutually exclusive states? ├─ YES (loading → loaded → error) │ └─ State Enum Pattern │ @Published var state: State = .idle │ enum State { case idle, loading, loaded(Data), error(String) } │ └─ NO (multiple independent properties) └─ Does the screen need form validation? ├─ YES → Combine Pattern (publishers for validation chains) └─ NO → Published Properties Pattern (simplest)
When State Enum wins: Product detail (loading → product → error), authentication flows, wizard steps. Forces exhaustive handling.
When Published Properties win: Dashboard with multiple independent sections that load/fail independently. State enum becomes unwieldy with 2^n combinations.
Where Does Logic Belong?
Is it data transformation for display? ├─ YES → ViewModel (formatting, filtering visible data) │ └─ NO → Is it reusable business logic? ├─ YES → Service Layer (API calls, validation rules, caching) │ └─ NO → Is it pure domain logic? ├─ YES → Model (computed properties, domain rules) └─ NO → Reconsider if it's needed
The trap: Putting API calls directly in ViewModel. Makes testing require network mocking instead of simple service mocking.
@StateObject Injection
Does ViewModel need dependencies from parent? ├─ NO → Direct initialization │ @StateObject private var viewModel = UserViewModel() │ └─ YES → How many dependencies? ├─ 1-2 → Init parameter │ init(userId: String) { │ _viewModel = StateObject(wrappedValue: UserViewModel(userId: userId)) │ } │ └─ Many → Factory/Container @StateObject private var viewModel: UserViewModel init() { _viewModel = StateObject(wrappedValue: Container.shared.makeUserViewModel()) }
NEVER Do
ViewModel Anti-Patterns
NEVER load data in ViewModel
init:
// ❌ Starts loading before view appears, can't cancel, can't retry class BadViewModel: ObservableObject { init() { Task { await loadData() } // Fire-and-forget in init } } // ✅ Load via .task modifier — automatic cancellation on disappear struct GoodView: View { @StateObject var viewModel = GoodViewModel() var body: some View { content.task { await viewModel.loadData() } } }
NEVER expose mutable state directly:
// ❌ Anyone can mutate — no control over state transitions class BadViewModel: ObservableObject { @Published var users: [User] = [] // Public setter } // ✅ private(set) — only ViewModel controls mutations class GoodViewModel: ObservableObject { @Published private(set) var users: [User] = [] func addUser(_ user: User) { // Validation, analytics, etc. users.append(user) } }
NEVER put UI-specific code in ViewModel:
// ❌ ViewModel knows about colors, fonts, formatters class BadViewModel: ObservableObject { @Published var priceColor: Color = .green @Published var formattedDate: String = "" // Pre-formatted for display } // ✅ Return data, let View handle presentation class GoodViewModel: ObservableObject { @Published private(set) var price: Decimal = 0 @Published private(set) var date: Date = .now } // View: Text(viewModel.price, format: .currency(code: "USD"))
NEVER create god ViewModels:
// ❌ One ViewModel for entire feature area class UserViewModel: ObservableObject { // Profile, settings, posts, friends, notifications, activity... // 50+ @Published properties, 30+ methods } // ✅ One ViewModel per screen/concern class UserProfileViewModel: ObservableObject { } class UserSettingsViewModel: ObservableObject { } class UserPostsViewModel: ObservableObject { }
Service Layer Anti-Patterns
NEVER use concrete dependencies:
// ❌ Hard to test — must mock URLSession class BadViewModel: ObservableObject { func loadUsers() async { let url = URL(string: "https://api.example.com/users")! let (data, _) = try await URLSession.shared.data(from: url) // Concrete } } // ✅ Protocol dependency — inject mock for testing protocol UserServiceProtocol { func fetchUsers() async throws -> [User] } class GoodViewModel: ObservableObject { private let userService: UserServiceProtocol init(userService: UserServiceProtocol = UserService()) { self.userService = userService } }
NEVER ignore task cancellation:
// ❌ Shows error for cancelled task (user navigated away) func loadData() async { do { users = try await service.fetchUsers() } catch { errorMessage = error.localizedDescription // CancellationError shows error! } } // ✅ Handle cancellation separately func loadData() async { do { users = try await service.fetchUsers() } catch is CancellationError { return // User navigated away — don't show error } catch { errorMessage = error.localizedDescription } }
Core Patterns
Minimal ViewModel Template
@MainActor final class FeatureViewModel: ObservableObject { // MARK: - State @Published private(set) var items: [Item] = [] @Published private(set) var isLoading = false @Published var error: Error? // MARK: - Dependencies private let service: ServiceProtocol init(service: ServiceProtocol = Service()) { self.service = service } // MARK: - Actions func loadItems() async { isLoading = true defer { isLoading = false } do { items = try await service.fetchItems() } catch is CancellationError { return } catch { self.error = error } } }
State Enum Pattern
@MainActor final class DetailViewModel: ObservableObject { enum State: Equatable { case idle case loading case loaded(Item) case error(String) var item: Item? { guard case .loaded(let item) = self else { return nil } return item } } @Published private(set) var state: State = .idle func load(id: String) async { state = .loading do { let item = try await service.fetch(id: id) state = .loaded(item) } catch { state = .error(error.localizedDescription) } } } // View exhaustive handling switch viewModel.state { case .idle, .loading: ProgressView() case .loaded(let item): ItemView(item: item) case .error(let message): ErrorView(message: message) }
Service Protocol Pattern
// Protocol — the contract protocol UserServiceProtocol { func fetchUser(id: String) async throws -> User func updateUser(_ user: User) async throws -> User } // Real implementation final class UserService: UserServiceProtocol { private let client: NetworkClient func fetchUser(id: String) async throws -> User { try await client.request(.user(id: id)) } } // Mock for testing final class MockUserService: UserServiceProtocol { var stubbedUser: User? var fetchError: Error? var fetchCallCount = 0 func fetchUser(id: String) async throws -> User { fetchCallCount += 1 if let error = fetchError { throw error } return stubbedUser ?? User.mock() } }
Testing Strategy
ViewModel Test Structure
@MainActor final class UserViewModelTests: XCTestCase { var sut: UserViewModel! var mockService: MockUserService! override func setUp() { mockService = MockUserService() sut = UserViewModel(service: mockService) } func test_loadUser_success_updatesState() async { // Given mockService.stubbedUser = User.mock(name: "John") // When await sut.loadUser(id: "123") // Then XCTAssertEqual(sut.user?.name, "John") XCTAssertFalse(sut.isLoading) XCTAssertNil(sut.error) } func test_loadUser_failure_setsError() async { // Given mockService.fetchError = NetworkError.noConnection // When await sut.loadUser(id: "123") // Then XCTAssertNil(sut.user) XCTAssertNotNil(sut.error) } }
Test what matters:
- State changes on success/failure
- Service method called with correct parameters
- Loading states transition correctly
- Error handling doesn't crash
Don't test:
- SwiftUI bindings (Apple's responsibility)
- Service implementation (separate test file)
Dependency Injection
Simple: Default Parameters
// Most apps need nothing more complex class UserViewModel: ObservableObject { init(service: UserServiceProtocol = UserService()) { self.service = service } } // Test: UserViewModel(service: MockUserService()) // Production: UserViewModel() — uses default
Complex: Factory Container
// Only when you have many cross-cutting dependencies @MainActor final class Container { static let shared = Container() lazy var networkClient = NetworkClient() lazy var authService = AuthService(client: networkClient) lazy var userService = UserService(client: networkClient, auth: authService) func makeUserViewModel() -> UserViewModel { UserViewModel(service: userService) } }
Quick Reference
Layer Responsibilities
| Layer | Contains | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Domain data + pure logic | User, Order, validation rules |
| ViewModel | Screen state + UI logic | Loading/error states, list filtering |
| Service | Business operations | API calls, caching, persistence |
| View | Presentation | Layout, styling, animations |
ViewModel Checklist
-
on class@MainActor -
on @Published propertiesprivate(set) - Protocol-based dependencies with defaults
- CancellationError handled separately
- No UI types (Color, Font, etc.)
- No direct network/database calls
- Testable without UI framework