Awesome-omni-skill resilience-classify

Research and classify stablecoins for resilience sub-factor overrides (chainRisk, collateralQuality, custodyModel). Run after types/defaults are implemented to identify coins needing explicit overrides.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/data-ai/resilience-classify" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skill-resilience-classify && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/data-ai/resilience-classify/SKILL.md
source content

Resilience Classification Skill

Identify stablecoins where the default inference (from backing + governance) is incorrect and apply overrides.

When to Invoke

  • After the resilience types and default inference are implemented
  • When a new stablecoin is added to the tracker
  • When auditing resilience scores for accuracy

Process

Step 1 — Identify candidates

Read all coins from

src/lib/stablecoins.ts
. For each, apply the default inference rules (see
inferResilienceDefaults()
in
src/lib/report-cards.ts
). Flag coins where the default is likely wrong based on:

  • collateral
    text containing keywords: "Solana", "tBTC", "WBTC", "delta-neutral", "perpetual", "CEX", "off-exchange", "Copper", "Ceffu", "Fireblocks", "bridged"
  • pegMechanism
    text containing: "Solana", "Bitcoin L2", "not Ethereum", "Tron"
  • contracts[]
    listing only non-Ethereum chains
  • backing
    =
    crypto-backed
    but collateral text mentions RWAs, bridges, or exotic strategies
  • Coins on this known-override list: HYUSD, USDe, meUSD, USDD, sUSD (Synthetix), USDJ

Step 2 — Research each candidate

For each flagged coin, in parallel:

  • WebFetch
    official docs for collateral composition, custody arrangement, and chain architecture
  • WebSearch
    for
    "{coin name}" stablecoin collateral custody chain
    to find independent analysis
  • Cross-reference with existing
    collateral
    and
    pegMechanism
    text fields

Step 3 — Classify

For each coin, determine the correct tier:

Sub-factorQuestionTiers
chainRisk
Where does the core protocol live and where is collateral held?
ethereum
(100),
stage1-l2
(66),
established-alt-l1
(33),
unproven
(0)
collateralQuality
What are the trust assumptions in backing assets?
native
(100),
eth-lst
(66),
alt-lst-bridged-or-mixed
(33),
exotic
(0)
custodyModel
Who holds the collateral and can it be verified on-chain?
onchain
(100),
institutional
(50),
cex
(0)

Classification rules:

  • chainRisk: Based on where the protocol's smart contracts and collateral vaults live, NOT where the token is bridged to
  • collateralQuality: For mixed collateral, use the tier of the riskiest significant component (>15% of backing). Stablecoin portions don't count here (handled by dependency risk)
  • custodyModel: If ANY significant portion is held off-chain by a non-institutional custodian, classify as
    cex
  • When uncertain between two tiers, choose the riskier (lower score) tier

Step 4 — Present findings

For each coin needing an override, present:

## {Name} ({Symbol}) — ID: {id}

### Default inference
- chainRisk: {inferred} — {correct/wrong because...}
- collateralQuality: {inferred} — {correct/wrong because...}
- custodyModel: {inferred} — {correct/wrong because...}

### Proposed overrides
- {field}: {value} — {justification with source URL}

### No override needed
- {fields where default is correct}

Step 5 — Apply

After user approval, edit

src/lib/stablecoins.ts
to add only the override fields that differ from defaults. Example:

usd("123", "Example", "EX", "crypto-backed", "decentralized", {
  // ... existing fields ...
  chainRisk: "established-alt-l1",
  collateralQuality: "alt-lst-bridged",
}),

Run

npm run build
to verify.