Awesome-omni-skill senior-devops
Senior DevOps engineering skill covering CI/CD pipeline design, infrastructure as code with Terraform, container orchestration with Kubernetes, cloud platform architecture (AWS, GCP, Azure), deployment strategies, monitoring and observability, and security hardening. Provides pipeline generation, Terraform scaffolding, and deployment management automation. Use when the user needs to build CI/CD pipelines, containerize applications, manage Kubernetes clusters, provision cloud infrastructure, implement deployment strategies, set up monitoring, optimize cloud costs, or handle incident response.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/development/senior-devops" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skill-senior-devops && rm -rf "$T"
skills/development/senior-devops/SKILL.mdSenior DevOps Engineer
Production-grade DevOps engineering toolkit covering the full infrastructure lifecycle: CI/CD pipeline design, container orchestration, infrastructure as code, cloud platform architecture, deployment strategies, observability, security hardening, cost optimization, and incident response.
Table of Contents
- Keywords
- Quick Start
- Docker and Containerization
- Kubernetes
- CI/CD Pipelines
- Infrastructure as Code
- Monitoring and Observability
- Cloud Platforms
- Deployment Strategies
- Security
- Cost Optimization
- Incident Response
- Reference Documentation
- Integration Points
Keywords
Use this skill when you encounter:
| Category | Terms |
|---|---|
| CI/CD | pipeline, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, build automation, artifact registry, continuous integration, continuous delivery, continuous deployment |
| Containers | Docker, Dockerfile, docker-compose, container image, multi-stage build, OCI, container registry, ECR, GCR, ACR |
| Orchestration | Kubernetes, k8s, kubectl, Helm, pod, deployment, service, ingress, HPA, VPA, StatefulSet, DaemonSet, CronJob |
| IaC | Terraform, OpenTofu, CloudFormation, Pulumi, Ansible, state management, tfstate, modules, workspaces, drift detection |
| Cloud | AWS, GCP, Azure, EC2, EKS, GKE, AKS, Lambda, Cloud Functions, S3, VPC, IAM, load balancer, auto-scaling |
| Monitoring | Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog, ELK, Loki, Jaeger, OpenTelemetry, alerting, SLO, SLI, SLA, dashboards |
| Deployment | blue-green, canary, rolling update, feature flags, rollback, zero-downtime, A/B deployment, progressive delivery |
| Security | Vault, secrets management, RBAC, network policy, supply chain security, SBOM, image scanning, Trivy, Falco |
| Reliability | incident response, runbook, postmortem, SRE, error budget, chaos engineering, disaster recovery, RTO, RPO |
| Cost | FinOps, right-sizing, spot instances, reserved capacity, cost allocation, tagging strategy, savings plans |
Quick Start
This skill provides three core automation tools:
# Generate CI/CD pipelines for any platform (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI) python scripts/pipeline_generator.py <project-path> --platform github-actions --verbose # Scaffold Terraform infrastructure with modules, state config, and environment separation python scripts/terraform_scaffolder.py <target-path> --provider aws --env production --verbose # Manage deployments with strategy selection, health checks, and rollback support python scripts/deployment_manager.py <target-path> --strategy canary --verbose
Tool Details
| Tool | Purpose | Key Flags |
|---|---|---|
| Generates CI/CD pipeline configurations from project analysis | , , |
| Creates Terraform module structure with best-practice patterns | , , |
| Orchestrates deployments with strategy selection and rollback | , , |
Docker and Containerization
Dockerfile Best Practices
Every production Dockerfile should follow this layered pattern:
# Stage 1: Build FROM node:20-alpine AS builder WORKDIR /app # Copy dependency manifests first (cache layer) COPY package.json package-lock.json ./ RUN npm ci --only=production && npm cache clean --force # Copy source and build COPY . . RUN npm run build # Stage 2: Production FROM node:20-alpine AS production WORKDIR /app # Run as non-root RUN addgroup -g 1001 appgroup && \ adduser -u 1001 -G appgroup -s /bin/sh -D appuser # Copy only production artifacts COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/dist ./dist COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/node_modules ./node_modules COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/package.json ./ USER appuser EXPOSE 3000 HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s --start-period=10s --retries=3 \ CMD wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://localhost:3000/healthz || exit 1 CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"]
Critical rules:
- Always use specific image tags, never
in productionlatest - Order COPY instructions from least to most frequently changed (maximizes layer cache)
- Use
to exclude.dockerignore
,.git
, test files, docsnode_modules - Never store secrets in images -- use runtime injection via environment or mounted secrets
- Pin package manager versions:
notnpm ci
, lock files always copiednpm install - Multi-stage builds reduce final image size by 60-80%
Docker Compose Patterns
Production-ready compose for a typical microservice stack:
version: "3.9" x-common: &common restart: unless-stopped logging: driver: json-file options: max-size: "10m" max-file: "3" services: app: <<: *common build: context: . dockerfile: Dockerfile target: production ports: - "3000:3000" environment: - NODE_ENV=production - DATABASE_URL=postgresql://app:${DB_PASSWORD}@db:5432/appdb - REDIS_URL=redis://redis:6379 depends_on: db: condition: service_healthy redis: condition: service_healthy deploy: resources: limits: cpus: "1.0" memory: 512M reservations: cpus: "0.25" memory: 128M healthcheck: test: ["CMD", "wget", "--spider", "-q", "http://localhost:3000/healthz"] interval: 15s timeout: 5s retries: 3 db: <<: *common image: postgres:16-alpine volumes: - pgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data environment: POSTGRES_DB: appdb POSTGRES_USER: app POSTGRES_PASSWORD: ${DB_PASSWORD} healthcheck: test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U app -d appdb"] interval: 10s timeout: 5s retries: 5 redis: <<: *common image: redis:7-alpine command: redis-server --maxmemory 128mb --maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru volumes: - redisdata:/data healthcheck: test: ["CMD", "redis-cli", "ping"] interval: 10s timeout: 3s retries: 3 volumes: pgdata: redisdata:
Container Security Checklist
- Base images from trusted registries only (Docker Official, Chainguard, Distroless)
- Images scanned with Trivy or Grype before push:
trivy image --severity HIGH,CRITICAL myapp:latest - No root processes inside containers -- always use
directiveUSER - Read-only root filesystem where possible:
--read-only --tmpfs /tmp - Resource limits enforced (CPU, memory) to prevent noisy-neighbor attacks
- No secrets baked into image layers -- verify with
docker history --no-trunc - Minimal base images (Alpine, Distroless) to reduce attack surface
Kubernetes
Pod Design Patterns
Sidecar pattern -- add capabilities without modifying the main container:
apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: app labels: app: web spec: replicas: 3 selector: matchLabels: app: web template: metadata: labels: app: web annotations: prometheus.io/scrape: "true" prometheus.io/port: "9090" spec: serviceAccountName: app-sa securityContext: runAsNonRoot: true fsGroup: 1001 containers: - name: app image: myapp:1.2.3 ports: - containerPort: 3000 resources: requests: cpu: 250m memory: 256Mi limits: cpu: "1" memory: 512Mi livenessProbe: httpGet: path: /healthz port: 3000 initialDelaySeconds: 15 periodSeconds: 20 failureThreshold: 3 readinessProbe: httpGet: path: /ready port: 3000 initialDelaySeconds: 5 periodSeconds: 10 startupProbe: httpGet: path: /healthz port: 3000 failureThreshold: 30 periodSeconds: 10 env: - name: DB_PASSWORD valueFrom: secretKeyRef: name: app-secrets key: db-password - name: log-shipper image: fluent/fluent-bit:2.2 volumeMounts: - name: app-logs mountPath: /var/log/app volumes: - name: app-logs emptyDir: {}
Probe decision framework:
- startupProbe: Use for slow-starting apps (JVM, large model loading). Prevents liveness from killing a container that has not finished starting.
- livenessProbe: Detects deadlocks and hangs. Keep it simple (check process health, not downstream dependencies).
- readinessProbe: Controls traffic routing. Include dependency checks here (database reachable, cache warm).
Helm Chart Structure
charts/myapp/ Chart.yaml values.yaml values-staging.yaml values-production.yaml templates/ deployment.yaml service.yaml ingress.yaml hpa.yaml networkpolicy.yaml serviceaccount.yaml _helpers.tpl
Key
values.yaml patterns:
replicaCount: 3 image: repository: myapp tag: "1.2.3" pullPolicy: IfNotPresent resources: requests: cpu: 250m memory: 256Mi limits: cpu: "1" memory: 512Mi autoscaling: enabled: true minReplicas: 3 maxReplicas: 20 targetCPUUtilizationPercentage: 70 targetMemoryUtilizationPercentage: 80 ingress: enabled: true className: nginx annotations: cert-manager.io/cluster-issuer: letsencrypt-prod hosts: - host: app.example.com paths: - path: / pathType: Prefix tls: - secretName: app-tls hosts: - app.example.com
Resource Management and Auto-Scaling
HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler):
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2 kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler metadata: name: app-hpa spec: scaleTargetRef: apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment name: app minReplicas: 3 maxReplicas: 20 metrics: - type: Resource resource: name: cpu target: type: Utilization averageUtilization: 70 - type: Resource resource: name: memory target: type: Utilization averageUtilization: 80 behavior: scaleUp: stabilizationWindowSeconds: 60 policies: - type: Percent value: 50 periodSeconds: 60 scaleDown: stabilizationWindowSeconds: 300 policies: - type: Percent value: 25 periodSeconds: 120
Decision: HPA vs VPA vs KEDA
| Scaler | Use When | Avoid When |
|---|---|---|
| HPA | Stateless services, predictable CPU/memory patterns | Stateful workloads, bursty event-driven loads |
| VPA | Right-sizing requests/limits, batch jobs, single-replica workloads | Used alone for latency-sensitive services |
| KEDA | Event-driven scaling (queue depth, HTTP rate, cron) | Simple CPU-based scaling (HPA is simpler) |
CI/CD Pipelines
GitHub Actions
Production pipeline with caching, matrix testing, and deployment gates:
name: CI/CD on: push: branches: [main] pull_request: branches: [main] permissions: contents: read packages: write id-token: write env: REGISTRY: ghcr.io IMAGE_NAME: ${{ github.repository }} jobs: test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest strategy: matrix: node-version: [18, 20] steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }} cache: npm - run: npm ci - run: npm run lint - run: npm test -- --coverage - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 if: matrix.node-version == 20 with: name: coverage path: coverage/ security: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Run Trivy vulnerability scanner uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master with: scan-type: fs severity: HIGH,CRITICAL exit-code: 1 build: needs: [test, security] if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' runs-on: ubuntu-latest outputs: image-tag: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }} steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 - uses: docker/login-action@v3 with: registry: ${{ env.REGISTRY }} username: ${{ github.actor }} password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} - id: meta uses: docker/metadata-action@v5 with: images: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }} tags: | type=sha type=ref,event=branch - uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 with: context: . push: true tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }} cache-from: type=gha cache-to: type=gha,mode=max deploy-staging: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: staging steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Deploy to staging run: | helm upgrade --install app charts/myapp \ --namespace staging \ --values charts/myapp/values-staging.yaml \ --set image.tag=${{ github.sha }} \ --wait --timeout 300s deploy-production: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: production steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Deploy to production (canary) run: | helm upgrade --install app charts/myapp \ --namespace production \ --values charts/myapp/values-production.yaml \ --set image.tag=${{ github.sha }} \ --set canary.enabled=true \ --set canary.weight=10 \ --wait --timeout 300s
GitLab CI
stages: - test - build - deploy variables: DOCKER_BUILDKIT: 1 test: stage: test image: node:20-alpine cache: key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} paths: - node_modules/ script: - npm ci - npm run lint - npm test -- --coverage coverage: '/Lines\s*:\s*(\d+\.?\d*)%/' artifacts: reports: coverage_report: coverage_format: cobertura path: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml build: stage: build image: docker:24 services: - docker:24-dind only: - main script: - docker build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA . - docker push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA deploy_staging: stage: deploy environment: name: staging url: https://staging.example.com only: - main script: - helm upgrade --install app charts/myapp --namespace staging --set image.tag=$CI_COMMIT_SHA --wait deploy_production: stage: deploy environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com only: - main when: manual script: - helm upgrade --install app charts/myapp --namespace production --set image.tag=$CI_COMMIT_SHA --wait
Pipeline Design Principles
- Fail fast: Run linting and unit tests before expensive integration tests
- Cache aggressively: Node modules, Docker layers, Go modules, pip packages
- Immutable artifacts: Build once, deploy the same artifact to every environment
- Gate promotions: Require manual approval or automated smoke tests before production
- Parallel where possible: Run independent test suites and security scans concurrently
- Reproduce locally: Every CI step should be runnable on a developer machine
Infrastructure as Code
Terraform Module Structure
infrastructure/ modules/ vpc/ main.tf variables.tf outputs.tf eks/ main.tf variables.tf outputs.tf rds/ main.tf variables.tf outputs.tf environments/ staging/ main.tf # Calls modules with staging values terraform.tfvars backend.tf # S3 + DynamoDB state backend production/ main.tf terraform.tfvars backend.tf
State Management
Remote state with locking (AWS):
# backend.tf terraform { backend "s3" { bucket = "mycompany-terraform-state" key = "production/infrastructure.tfstate" region = "us-east-1" dynamodb_table = "terraform-locks" encrypt = true } }
State management rules:
- One state file per environment per component (blast radius control)
- Never store state locally or in git
- Enable encryption at rest and in transit
- Use DynamoDB (AWS) or Cloud Storage (GCP) for state locking
- Run
in CI,terraform plan
only after approvalterraform apply - Use
andterraform state list
for debugging, never edit state manuallyterraform state show
Workspace vs Directory Pattern
| Pattern | Use When | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| Workspaces | Same config, different scale (dev/staging/prod with identical topology) | Shared state backend, easy switching, but harder to diverge configs |
| Directories | Different environments need different resources or topology | Full isolation, clear boundaries, but duplicated boilerplate |
Recommendation: Use directories for environment separation. Use modules for shared logic. Workspaces are better suited for ephemeral environments (PR previews, load test environments).
Drift Detection
Integrate drift detection into CI:
# Run in CI on a schedule (daily) terraform plan -detailed-exitcode -out=plan.tfplan # Exit code 0 = no changes (clean) # Exit code 1 = error # Exit code 2 = changes detected (drift) # Alert on exit code 2 if [ $? -eq 2 ]; then # Send alert to Slack/PagerDuty curl -X POST "$SLACK_WEBHOOK" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"text":"Terraform drift detected in production. Review required."}' fi
Terraform Anti-Patterns
- Monolithic state: One state file for the entire infrastructure. Split by component and environment.
- Hardcoded values: Use variables and tfvars. Never hardcode AMI IDs, instance types, or CIDR blocks.
- No lifecycle rules: Use
on critical resources (databases, S3 buckets with data).prevent_destroy - Ignoring plan output: Always review plan diffs before apply, especially
anddestroy
actions.replace
Monitoring and Observability
The Three Pillars
| Pillar | Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics | Prometheus + Grafana | Numeric time-series data (CPU, latency, error rates) |
| Logs | Loki / ELK (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) | Structured event records for debugging |
| Traces | Jaeger / Tempo + OpenTelemetry | Request flow across services for latency analysis |
Prometheus Alerting Rules
groups: - name: application rules: - alert: HighErrorRate expr: | sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) > 0.05 for: 5m labels: severity: critical annotations: summary: "Error rate exceeds 5% for 5 minutes" runbook: "https://wiki.example.com/runbooks/high-error-rate" - alert: HighLatencyP99 expr: | histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) by (le)) > 2.0 for: 10m labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "P99 latency exceeds 2s for 10 minutes" - alert: PodCrashLooping expr: | increase(kube_pod_container_status_restarts_total[1h]) > 5 for: 5m labels: severity: critical annotations: summary: "Pod {{ $labels.pod }} restarting frequently" - alert: DiskSpaceLow expr: | (node_filesystem_avail_bytes{mountpoint="/"} / node_filesystem_size_bytes{mountpoint="/"}) < 0.15 for: 10m labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "Disk space below 15% on {{ $labels.instance }}"
SLO/SLI Definitions
Define SLIs first, then set SLOs:
| Service | SLI (what you measure) | SLO (target) | Error Budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| API Gateway | Successful requests / Total requests | 99.9% availability (43.8 min/month downtime) | 0.1% |
| API Latency | Requests under 500ms / Total requests | 99th percentile < 500ms | 1% |
| Data Pipeline | Successful pipeline runs / Total runs | 99.5% success rate | 0.5% |
| Deployment | Successful deploys / Total deploys | 99% success rate | 1% |
Error budget policy: When the error budget is exhausted, freeze feature deployments and prioritize reliability work until the budget recovers.
Grafana Dashboard Essentials
Every service dashboard should include these panels (the "Four Golden Signals"):
- Latency: P50, P90, P99 response times (histogram)
- Traffic: Requests per second by endpoint and status code
- Errors: 5xx rate, 4xx rate, application-specific error codes
- Saturation: CPU usage, memory usage, connection pool utilization, queue depth
Cloud Platforms
Service Comparison Matrix
| Capability | AWS | GCP | Azure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Kubernetes | EKS | GKE | AKS |
| Serverless Compute | Lambda | Cloud Functions / Cloud Run | Azure Functions |
| Container Service | ECS/Fargate | Cloud Run | Container Apps |
| Object Storage | S3 | Cloud Storage | Blob Storage |
| Managed Database | RDS / Aurora | Cloud SQL / AlloyDB | Azure SQL / Cosmos DB |
| Message Queue | SQS / SNS | Pub/Sub | Service Bus |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloud CDN | Azure CDN / Front Door |
| DNS | Route 53 | Cloud DNS | Azure DNS |
| Secrets | Secrets Manager | Secret Manager | Key Vault |
| IAM | IAM + STS | IAM + Workload Identity | Entra ID + RBAC |
| IaC | CloudFormation / CDK | Deployment Manager | Bicep / ARM |
Multi-Cloud Strategy Decision Framework
When multi-cloud makes sense:
- Regulatory requirements mandate geographic or vendor diversity
- Acquisition brings in workloads on a different cloud
- Specific best-of-breed services (e.g., GCP for ML, AWS for breadth)
When it does not:
- Avoiding vendor lock-in as the sole motivation (the operational tax exceeds the savings)
- Small teams that cannot afford the complexity overhead
- Workloads with no regulatory driver for distribution
If you go multi-cloud:
- Use Terraform (not provider-specific IaC) for the abstraction layer
- Standardize on Kubernetes as the compute plane across clouds
- Centralize observability (Datadog, Grafana Cloud) to avoid fragmented visibility
- Invest in a platform engineering team to manage the abstraction
Deployment Strategies
Strategy Selection Framework
| Strategy | Risk | Rollback Speed | Infrastructure Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Update | Medium | Minutes | 1x | Stateless services, internal APIs |
| Blue-Green | Low | Seconds (DNS/LB switch) | 2x during deploy | Mission-critical, zero-downtime required |
| Canary | Low | Seconds (shift traffic back) | 1.1x | User-facing services, gradual validation |
| Feature Flags | Lowest | Instant (toggle) | 1x | Granular control, A/B testing, trunk-based dev |
Blue-Green Implementation
# Blue (current production) apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: app-production spec: selector: app: myapp version: blue # Points to current version ports: - port: 80 targetPort: 3000 --- # Green (new version) -- deploy alongside blue apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: app-green spec: replicas: 3 selector: matchLabels: app: myapp version: green template: metadata: labels: app: myapp version: green spec: containers: - name: app image: myapp:2.0.0
Cutover steps:
- Deploy green alongside blue (both running, only blue serves traffic)
- Run smoke tests against green via internal service or port-forward
- Switch the service selector from
toversion: blueversion: green - Monitor for 15 minutes
- If healthy, scale down blue. If not, switch selector back to blue.
Canary with Istio/Nginx
# Istio VirtualService for canary routing apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: app-canary spec: hosts: - app.example.com http: - route: - destination: host: app-stable port: number: 80 weight: 90 - destination: host: app-canary port: number: 80 weight: 10
Canary promotion ladder:
- Deploy canary with 5% traffic
- Monitor error rate and latency for 10 minutes
- Promote to 25%, monitor 10 minutes
- Promote to 50%, monitor 15 minutes
- Promote to 100% (canary becomes stable)
- Automated rollback if error rate exceeds baseline by 2x at any step
Feature Flags
Use feature flags for decoupling deployment from release:
# Example with LaunchDarkly / Unleash / simple config if feature_flags.is_enabled("new-checkout-flow", user_context): return new_checkout_handler(request) else: return legacy_checkout_handler(request)
Flag lifecycle:
- Create flag (default: off)
- Enable for internal users / beta testers
- Gradual rollout: 5% -> 25% -> 50% -> 100%
- Remove flag and dead code path within 2 sprints of full rollout
Security
Secret Management
Decision matrix:
| Tool | Best For | Avoid When |
|---|---|---|
| HashiCorp Vault | Dynamic secrets, PKI, encryption as a service, multi-cloud | Small teams, simple applications |
| AWS Secrets Manager | AWS-native workloads, automatic rotation | Multi-cloud or hybrid requirements |
| AWS SSM Parameter Store | Non-sensitive config, low-cost secret storage | Rotation or audit requirements at scale |
| Kubernetes Secrets | Pod-level injection (with encryption at rest enabled) | Storing secrets long-term or sharing across clusters |
| SOPS / age | Encrypted secrets in git (gitops workflows) | Teams unfamiliar with key management |
Vault integration pattern for Kubernetes:
# Using Vault Agent Injector apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: app spec: template: metadata: annotations: vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject: "true" vault.hashicorp.com/role: "app-role" vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-secret-db: "secret/data/app/db" vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-template-db: | {{- with secret "secret/data/app/db" -}} export DB_HOST={{ .Data.data.host }} export DB_PASSWORD={{ .Data.data.password }} {{- end -}} spec: serviceAccountName: app-sa containers: - name: app image: myapp:1.2.3 command: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "source /vault/secrets/db && node server.js"]
Network Policies
Default-deny with explicit allow:
# Default deny all ingress and egress apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: NetworkPolicy metadata: name: default-deny-all namespace: production spec: podSelector: {} policyTypes: - Ingress - Egress --- # Allow app to receive traffic from ingress controller and talk to database apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: NetworkPolicy metadata: name: app-network-policy namespace: production spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: web policyTypes: - Ingress - Egress ingress: - from: - namespaceSelector: matchLabels: name: ingress-nginx ports: - protocol: TCP port: 3000 egress: - to: - podSelector: matchLabels: app: postgres ports: - protocol: TCP port: 5432 - to: # Allow DNS resolution - namespaceSelector: {} ports: - protocol: UDP port: 53
RBAC Best Practices
- Follow the principle of least privilege: grant minimum permissions needed
- Use ClusterRoles for cluster-wide resources, Roles for namespace-scoped
- Bind service accounts to roles, not users (service accounts are auditable and rotatable)
- Audit RBAC with:
kubectl auth can-i --list --as=system:serviceaccount:production:app-sa - Never grant
to application service accountscluster-admin
Supply Chain Security
# Sign container images with cosign cosign sign --key cosign.key ghcr.io/myorg/myapp:1.2.3 # Verify before deployment cosign verify --key cosign.pub ghcr.io/myorg/myapp:1.2.3 # Generate SBOM syft ghcr.io/myorg/myapp:1.2.3 -o spdx-json > sbom.json # Scan SBOM for vulnerabilities grype sbom:sbom.json --fail-on high
Admission control: Use Kyverno or OPA Gatekeeper to enforce policies:
- Only allow images from trusted registries
- Require image signatures
- Block containers running as root
- Enforce resource limits on all pods
Cost Optimization
Right-Sizing Methodology
- Collect: Gather 2-4 weeks of CPU and memory utilization data from Prometheus/CloudWatch
- Analyze: Identify instances running below 40% average CPU utilization
- Recommend: Suggest one size down (e.g., m5.xlarge -> m5.large)
- Validate: Apply in staging, load test, confirm no performance regression
- Apply: Resize in production during maintenance window
- Monitor: Track for 1 week post-change to confirm stability
Spot/Preemptible Instance Strategy
| Workload Type | Spot Suitable? | Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Stateless web servers (behind LB) | Yes | Mix 70% spot + 30% on-demand |
| CI/CD runners | Yes | 100% spot with retry logic |
| Batch processing / ETL | Yes | Spot fleet with checkpointing |
| Databases / stateful | No | Use reserved instances |
| Kubernetes control plane | No | On-demand or reserved |
| Dev/test environments | Yes | 100% spot, accept interruptions |
FinOps Practices
- Tagging strategy: Enforce tags for
,team
,environment
,service
on all resourcescost-center - Budget alerts: Set CloudWatch/GCP Budget alerts at 50%, 80%, 100% of monthly budget
- Reserved capacity: Purchase 1-year reservations for baseline workloads (30-40% savings)
- Savings Plans: Use Compute Savings Plans (AWS) for flexible commitment discounts
- Scheduled scaling: Scale down non-production environments outside business hours
- Storage lifecycle: S3 lifecycle policies to move old data to Glacier/Archive tiers
- Unused resource cleanup: Weekly scan for unattached EBS volumes, idle load balancers, stale snapshots
Incident Response
Severity Classification
| Severity | Definition | Response Time | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEV-1 | Complete service outage, data loss risk | 15 minutes | Production database down, payment system failure |
| SEV-2 | Significant degradation, partial outage | 30 minutes | High error rate, API latency > 10x normal |
| SEV-3 | Minor degradation, workaround available | 4 hours | Non-critical feature broken, elevated error rate < 1% |
| SEV-4 | Cosmetic / informational | Next business day | Dashboard rendering issue, log verbosity spike |
Runbook Template
# Runbook: [Service Name] - [Issue Type] ## Symptoms - What alerts fire - What users report - What dashboards show ## Impact - Which users/services affected - Revenue impact estimate ## Diagnosis Steps 1. Check service health: `kubectl get pods -n production -l app=myapp` 2. Review recent deployments: `helm history myapp -n production` 3. Check error logs: `kubectl logs -l app=myapp -n production --tail=100` 4. Verify database connectivity: `kubectl exec -it app-pod -- pg_isready -h db-host` 5. Check resource utilization: Review Grafana dashboard [link] ## Remediation ### Quick Fix (< 5 min) - Restart pods: `kubectl rollout restart deployment/myapp -n production` - Scale up: `kubectl scale deployment/myapp --replicas=10 -n production` ### Rollback (< 10 min) - `helm rollback myapp [previous-revision] -n production` ### Root Cause Fix - [Document fix steps specific to this issue] ## Escalation - L1: On-call engineer (PagerDuty) - L2: Team lead / service owner - L3: VP Engineering (SEV-1 only) ## Communication - Statuspage update within 15 min of SEV-1/SEV-2 - Slack channel: #incidents
Postmortem Process
Every SEV-1 and SEV-2 incident requires a blameless postmortem within 3 business days:
- Timeline: Minute-by-minute reconstruction of what happened
- Root cause: Use the "5 Whys" technique to identify the underlying cause
- Impact: Users affected, duration, revenue impact
- What went well: Detection, communication, and resolution that worked
- What went poorly: Gaps in monitoring, slow response, unclear ownership
- Action items: Concrete tasks with owners and due dates, prioritized by impact
- Lessons learned: Patterns to adopt or avoid going forward
Template: Store postmortems in a shared wiki. Link them from the incident channel for team visibility.
Reference Documentation
This skill includes three reference guides for deep-dive topics:
| Reference | Path | Covers |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD Pipeline Guide | | Pipeline patterns, platform comparisons, optimization techniques, testing strategies |
| Infrastructure as Code | | Terraform patterns, module design, state management, provider configuration |
| Deployment Strategies | | Strategy comparison, implementation details, rollback procedures, traffic management |
Use the reference files for extended examples and edge-case handling beyond what this skill file covers.
Integration Points
This skill works alongside other skills in the library:
| Skill | Integration |
|---|---|
| senior-secops | Security scanning in CI/CD pipelines, container image scanning, compliance checks |
| senior-architect | Infrastructure design decisions, service topology, dependency analysis |
| senior-backend | Application containerization, health check endpoints, config management |
| senior-cloud-architect | Cloud platform selection, multi-region architecture, disaster recovery planning |
| incident-commander | Incident escalation procedures, communication protocols, postmortem facilitation |
| code-reviewer | Infrastructure-as-code review standards, Terraform plan review, pipeline config review |
| aws-solution-architect | AWS-specific infrastructure patterns, service selection, cost optimization |
Last Updated: February 2026 Version: 2.0.0 Tools: 3 Python automation scripts References: 3 deep-dive guides