Awesome-omni-skills apify-market-research-v2

Market Research workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Analyze market conditions, geographic opportunities, pricing, consumer behavior, and product validation across Google Maps, Facebook, Instagram, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/apify-market-research-v2" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-apify-market-research-v2 && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/apify-market-research-v2/SKILL.md
source content

Market Research

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/apify-market-research
from
https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json
plus
ORIGIN.md
as the provenance anchor for review.

Market Research Conduct market research using Apify Actors to extract data from multiple platforms.

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Prerequisites, Error Handling, Limitations.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

  • You need market sizing, regional demand, pricing, trend, or consumer behavior data.
  • The task is to gather research inputs from maps, travel, Facebook, Instagram, or trend sources with Apify.
  • You need structured market data plus a synthesized view of opportunities or risks.
  • Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Analyze market conditions, geographic opportunities, pricing, consumer behavior, and product validation across Google Maps, Facebook, Instagram, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor.
  • Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
  • Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.

Operating Table

SituationStart hereWhy it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
reference/scripts/run_actor.js
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
reference/scripts/run_actor.js
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

  1. Step 1: Identify market research type (select Actor)
  2. Step 2: Fetch Actor schema via mcpc
  3. Step 3: Ask user preferences (format, filename)
  4. Step 4: Run the analysis script
  5. Step 5: Summarize findings
  6. User Need - Actor ID - Best For
  7. Market density - compass/crawler-google-places - Location analysis

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Workflow

Copy this checklist and track progress:

Task Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Identify market research type (select Actor)
- [ ] Step 2: Fetch Actor schema via mcpc
- [ ] Step 3: Ask user preferences (format, filename)
- [ ] Step 4: Run the analysis script
- [ ] Step 5: Summarize findings

Step 1: Identify Market Research Type

Select the appropriate Actor based on research needs:

User NeedActor IDBest For
Market density
compass/crawler-google-places
Location analysis
Geospatial analysis
compass/google-maps-extractor
Business mapping
Regional interest
apify/google-trends-scraper
Trend data
Pricing and demand
apify/facebook-marketplace-scraper
Market pricing
Event market
apify/facebook-events-scraper
Event analysis
Consumer needs
apify/facebook-groups-scraper
Group research
Market landscape
apify/facebook-pages-scraper
Business pages
Business density
apify/facebook-page-contact-information
Contact data
Cultural insights
apify/facebook-photos-scraper
Visual research
Niche targeting
apify/instagram-hashtag-scraper
Hashtag research
Hashtag stats
apify/instagram-hashtag-stats
Market sizing
Market activity
apify/instagram-reel-scraper
Activity analysis
Market intelligence
apify/instagram-scraper
Full data
Product launch research
apify/instagram-api-scraper
API access
Hospitality market
voyager/booking-scraper
Hotel data
Tourism insights
maxcopell/tripadvisor-reviews
Review analysis

Step 2: Fetch Actor Schema

Fetch the Actor's input schema and details dynamically using mcpc:

export $(grep APIFY_TOKEN .env | xargs) && mcpc --json mcp.apify.com --header "Authorization: Bearer $APIFY_TOKEN" tools-call fetch-actor-details actor:="ACTOR_ID" | jq -r ".content"

Replace

ACTOR_ID
with the selected Actor (e.g.,
compass/crawler-google-places
).

This returns:

  • Actor description and README
  • Required and optional input parameters
  • Output fields (if available)

Step 3: Ask User Preferences

Before running, ask:

  1. Output format:
    • Quick answer - Display top few results in chat (no file saved)
    • CSV - Full export with all fields
    • JSON - Full export in JSON format
  2. Number of results: Based on character of use case

Step 4: Run the Script

Quick answer (display in chat, no file):

node --env-file=.env ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/scripts/run_actor.js \
  --actor "ACTOR_ID" \
  --input 'JSON_INPUT'

CSV:

node --env-file=.env ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/scripts/run_actor.js \
  --actor "ACTOR_ID" \
  --input 'JSON_INPUT' \
  --output YYYY-MM-DD_OUTPUT_FILE.csv \
  --format csv

JSON:

node --env-file=.env ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/scripts/run_actor.js \
  --actor "ACTOR_ID" \
  --input 'JSON_INPUT' \
  --output YYYY-MM-DD_OUTPUT_FILE.json \
  --format json

Step 5: Summarize Findings

After completion, report:

  • Number of results found
  • File location and name
  • Key market insights
  • Suggested next steps (deeper analysis, validation)

Imported: Prerequisites

(No need to check it upfront)

  • .env
    file with
    APIFY_TOKEN
  • Node.js 20.6+ (for native
    --env-file
    support)
  • mcpc
    CLI tool:
    npm install -g @apify/mcpc

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @apify-market-research-v2 to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @apify-market-research-v2 against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @apify-market-research-v2 for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @apify-market-research-v2 using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

  • Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
  • Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
  • Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
  • Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
  • Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
  • Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/apify-market-research
, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open
metadata.json
,
ORIGIN.md
, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md
, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

  • @apify-actorization-v2
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @apify-audience-analysis-v2
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @apify-brand-reputation-monitoring-v2
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @apify-competitor-intelligence-v2
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Resource familyWhat it gives the reviewerExample path
references
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream
references/n/a
examples
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream
examples/n/a
scripts
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation
scripts/n/a
agents
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package
agents/n/a
assets
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package
assets/n/a

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Error Handling

APIFY_TOKEN not found
- Ask user to create
.env
with
APIFY_TOKEN=your_token
mcpc not found
- Ask user to install
npm install -g @apify/mcpc
Actor not found
- Check Actor ID spelling
Run FAILED
- Ask user to check Apify console link in error output
Timeout
- Reduce input size or increase
--timeout

Imported: Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.