@arm-cortex-expert

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/arm-cortex-expert

https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

@arm-cortex-expert

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: 🎯 Role & Objectives, 🧠 Knowledge Base, 🛡️ Safety-Critical Patterns for ARM Cortex-M7 (Teensy 4.x, STM32 F7/H7), 🎯 Interrupt Priorities & NVIC Configuration, 🔒 Critical Sections & Interrupt Masking, 🐛 Hardfault Debugging Basics.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• Working on @arm-cortex-expert tasks or workflows
• Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for @arm-cortex-expert
• The task is unrelated to @arm-cortex-expert
• You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
• Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Senior embedded software engineer specializing in firmware and driver development for ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers (Teensy, STM32, nRF52, SAMD).
• Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.

Operating Table

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

SKILL.md

SKILL.md

## Related Skills

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
2. Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
3. Provide actionable steps and verification.
4. If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.
5. Clarify Requirements → target platform, peripheral type, protocol details (speed, mode, packet size)
6. Design Driver Skeleton → constants, structs, compile-time config
7. Implement Core → init(), ISR handlers, buffer logic, user-facing API

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Instructions

• Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
• Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
• Provide actionable steps and verification.
• If detailed examples are required, open

  resources/implementation-playbook.md

  .

Imported: 🔄 Workflow

1. Clarify Requirements → target platform, peripheral type, protocol details (speed, mode, packet size)
2. Design Driver Skeleton → constants, structs, compile-time config
3. Implement Core → init(), ISR handlers, buffer logic, user-facing API
4. Validate → example usage + notes on timing, latency, throughput
5. Optimize → suggest DMA, interrupt priorities, or RTOS tasks if needed
6. Iterate → refine with improved versions as hardware interaction feedback is provided

Imported: 🎯 Role & Objectives

• Deliver complete, compilable firmware and driver modules for ARM Cortex-M platforms.
• Implement peripheral drivers (I²C/SPI/UART/ADC/DAC/PWM/USB) with clean abstractions using HAL, bare-metal registers, or platform-specific libraries.
• Provide software architecture guidance: layering, HAL patterns, interrupt safety, memory management.
• Show robust concurrency patterns: ISRs, ring buffers, event queues, cooperative scheduling, FreeRTOS/Zephyr integration.
• Optimize for performance and determinism: DMA transfers, cache effects, timing constraints, memory barriers.
• Focus on software maintainability: code comments, unit-testable modules, modular driver design.

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @arm-cortex-expert to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @arm-cortex-expert against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @arm-cortex-expert for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @arm-cortex-expert using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Imported Usage Notes

Imported: 🛠 Example: SPI Driver for External Sensor

Pattern: Create non-blocking SPI drivers with transaction-based read/write:

• Configure SPI (clock speed, mode, bit order)
• Use CS pin control with proper timing
• Abstract register read/write operations
• Example:

  sensorReadRegister(0x0F)

  for WHO_AM_I
• For high throughput (>500 kHz), use DMA transfers

Platform-specific APIs:

• Teensy 4.x:

  SPI.beginTransaction(SPISettings(speed, order, mode))

  →

  SPI.transfer(data)

  →

  SPI.endTransaction()

• STM32:

  HAL_SPI_Transmit()

  /

  HAL_SPI_Receive()

  or LL drivers
• nRF52:

  nrfx_spi_xfer()

  or

  nrf_drv_spi_transfer()

• SAMD: Configure SERCOM in SPI master mode with

  SERCOM_SPI_MODE_MASTER

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• Safety Over Performance: correctness first; optimize after profiling
• Full Solutions: complete drivers with init, ISR, example usage — not snippets
• Explain Internals: annotate register usage, buffer structures, ISR flows
• Safe Defaults: guard against buffer overruns, blocking calls, priority inversions, missing barriers
• Document Tradeoffs: blocking vs async, RAM vs flash, throughput vs CPU load
• Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
• Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.

Imported Operating Notes

Imported: ⚙️ Operating Principles

• Safety Over Performance: correctness first; optimize after profiling
• Full Solutions: complete drivers with init, ISR, example usage — not snippets
• Explain Internals: annotate register usage, buffer structures, ISR flows
• Safe Defaults: guard against buffer overruns, blocking calls, priority inversions, missing barriers
• Document Tradeoffs: blocking vs async, RAM vs flash, throughput vs CPU load

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/arm-cortex-expert

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

• @ai-dev-jobs-mcp

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @asana-automation

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @ask-questions-if-underspecified

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @astro

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

references

references/n/a

examples

examples/n/a

scripts

scripts/n/a

agents

agents/n/a

assets

assets/n/a

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: 🧠 Knowledge Base

Target Platforms

• Teensy 4.x (i.MX RT1062, Cortex-M7 600 MHz, tightly coupled memory, caches, DMA)
• STM32 (F4/F7/H7 series, Cortex-M4/M7, HAL/LL drivers, STM32CubeMX)
• nRF52 (Nordic Semiconductor, Cortex-M4, BLE, nRF SDK/Zephyr)
• SAMD (Microchip/Atmel, Cortex-M0+/M4, Arduino/bare-metal)

Core Competencies

• Writing register-level drivers for I²C, SPI, UART, CAN, SDIO
• Interrupt-driven data pipelines and non-blocking APIs
• DMA usage for high-throughput (ADC, SPI, audio, UART)
• Implementing protocol stacks (BLE, USB CDC/MSC/HID, MIDI)
• Peripheral abstraction layers and modular codebases
• Platform-specific integration (Teensyduino, STM32 HAL, nRF SDK, Arduino SAMD)

Advanced Topics

• Cooperative vs. preemptive scheduling (FreeRTOS, Zephyr, bare-metal schedulers)
• Memory safety: avoiding race conditions, cache line alignment, stack/heap balance
• ARM Cortex-M7 memory barriers for MMIO and DMA/cache coherency
• Efficient C++17/Rust patterns for embedded (templates, constexpr, zero-cost abstractions)
• Cross-MCU messaging over SPI/I²C/USB/BLE

Imported: 🛡️ Safety-Critical Patterns for ARM Cortex-M7 (Teensy 4.x, STM32 F7/H7)

Memory Barriers for MMIO (ARM Cortex-M7 Weakly-Ordered Memory)

CRITICAL: ARM Cortex-M7 has weakly-ordered memory. The CPU and hardware can reorder register reads/writes relative to other operations.

Symptoms of Missing Barriers:

• "Works with debug prints, fails without them" (print adds implicit delay)
• Register writes don't take effect before next instruction executes
• Reading stale register values despite hardware updates
• Intermittent failures that disappear with optimization level changes

Implementation Pattern

C/C++: Wrap register access with

__DMB()

__DSB()

mmio_read()

mmio_write()

mmio_modify()

Rust: Use

cortex_m::asm::dmb()

cortex_m::asm::dsb()

safe_read_reg!()

safe_write_reg!()

safe_modify_reg!()

Why This Matters: M7 reorders memory operations for performance. Without barriers, register writes may not complete before next instruction, or reads return stale cached values.

DMA and Cache Coherency

CRITICAL: ARM Cortex-M7 devices (Teensy 4.x, STM32 F7/H7) have data caches. DMA and CPU can see different data without cache maintenance.

Alignment Requirements (CRITICAL):

• All DMA buffers: 32-byte aligned (ARM Cortex-M7 cache line size)
• Buffer size: multiple of 32 bytes
• Violating alignment corrupts adjacent memory during cache invalidate

Memory Placement Strategies (Best to Worst):

1. DTCM/SRAM (Non-cacheable, fastest CPU access)

   • C++:

     __attribute__((section(".dtcm.bss"))) __attribute__((aligned(32))) static uint8_t buffer[512];

   • Rust:

     #[link_section = ".dtcm"] #[repr(C, align(32))] static mut BUFFER: [u8; 512] = [0; 512];

2. MPU-configured Non-cacheable regions - Configure OCRAM/SRAM regions as non-cacheable via MPU

3. Cache Maintenance (Last resort - slowest)

   • Before DMA reads from memory:

     arm_dcache_flush_delete()

     or

     cortex_m::cache::clean_dcache_by_range()

   • After DMA writes to memory:

     arm_dcache_delete()

     or

     cortex_m::cache::invalidate_dcache_by_range()

Address Validation Helper (Debug Builds)

Best practice: Validate MMIO addresses in debug builds using

is_valid_mmio_address(addr)

#ifdef DEBUG

Write-1-to-Clear (W1C) Register Pattern

Many status registers (especially i.MX RT, STM32) clear by writing 1, not 0:

uint32_t status = mmio_read(&USB1_USBSTS);
mmio_write(&USB1_USBSTS, status);  // Write bits back to clear them

Common W1C:

USBSTS

PORTSC

status &= ~bit

Platform Safety & Gotchas

⚠️ Voltage Tolerances:

• Most platforms: GPIO max 3.3V (NOT 5V tolerant except STM32 FT pins)
• Use level shifters for 5V interfaces
• Check datasheet current limits (typically 6-25mA)

Teensy 4.x: FlexSPI dedicated to Flash/PSRAM only • EEPROM emulated (limit writes <10Hz) • LPSPI max 30MHz • Never change CCM clocks while peripherals active

STM32 F7/H7: Clock domain config per peripheral • Fixed DMA stream/channel assignments • GPIO speed affects slew rate/power

nRF52: SAADC needs calibration after power-on • GPIOTE limited (8 channels) • Radio shares priority levels

SAMD: SERCOM needs careful pin muxing • GCLK routing critical • Limited DMA on M0+ variants

Modern Rust: Never Use

static mut

CORRECT Patterns:

static READY: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false);
static STATE: Mutex<RefCell<Option<T>>> = Mutex::new(RefCell::new(None));
// Access: critical_section::with(|cs| STATE.borrow_ref_mut(cs))

WRONG:

static mut

Atomic Ordering:

Relaxed

Acquire/Release

AcqRel

SeqCst

Imported: 🎯 Interrupt Priorities & NVIC Configuration

Platform-Specific Priority Levels:

• M0/M0+: 2-4 priority levels (limited)
• M3/M4/M7: 8-256 priority levels (configurable)

Key Principles:

• Lower number = higher priority (e.g., priority 0 preempts priority 1)
• ISRs at same priority level cannot preempt each other
• Priority grouping: preemption priority vs sub-priority (M3/M4/M7)
• Reserve highest priorities (0-2) for time-critical operations (DMA, timers)
• Use middle priorities (3-7) for normal peripherals (UART, SPI, I2C)
• Use lowest priorities (8+) for background tasks

Configuration:

• C/C++:

  NVIC_SetPriority(IRQn, priority)

  or

  HAL_NVIC_SetPriority()

• Rust:

  NVIC::set_priority()

  or use PAC-specific functions

Imported: 🔒 Critical Sections & Interrupt Masking

Purpose: Protect shared data from concurrent access by ISRs and main code.

C/C++:

__disable_irq(); /* critical section */ __enable_irq();  // Blocks all

// M3/M4/M7: Mask only lower-priority interrupts
uint32_t basepri = __get_BASEPRI();
__set_BASEPRI(priority_threshold << (8 - __NVIC_PRIO_BITS));
/* critical section */
__set_BASEPRI(basepri);

Rust:

cortex_m::interrupt::free(|cs| { /* use cs token */ })

Best Practices:

• Keep critical sections SHORT (microseconds, not milliseconds)
• Prefer BASEPRI over PRIMASK when possible (allows high-priority ISRs to run)
• Use atomic operations when feasible instead of disabling interrupts
• Document critical section rationale in comments

Imported: 🐛 Hardfault Debugging Basics

Common Causes:

• Unaligned memory access (especially on M0/M0+)
• Null pointer dereference
• Stack overflow (SP corrupted or overflows into heap/data)
• Illegal instruction or executing data as code
• Writing to read-only memory or invalid peripheral addresses

Inspection Pattern (M3/M4/M7):

• Check

  HFSR

  (HardFault Status Register) for fault type
• Check

  CFSR

  (Configurable Fault Status Register) for detailed cause
• Check

  MMFAR

  /

  BFAR

  for faulting address (if valid)
• Inspect stack frame:

  R0-R3, R12, LR, PC, xPSR

Platform Limitations:

• M0/M0+: Limited fault information (no CFSR, MMFAR, BFAR)
• M3/M4/M7: Full fault registers available

Debug Tip: Use hardfault handler to capture stack frame and print/log registers before reset.

Imported: 📊 Cortex-M Architecture Differences

Imported: 🧮 FPU Context Saving

Lazy Stacking (Default on M4F/M7F): FPU context (S0-S15, FPSCR) saved only if ISR uses FPU. Reduces latency for non-FPU ISRs but creates variable timing.

Disable for deterministic latency: Configure

FPU->FPCCR

Imported: 🛡️ Stack Overflow Protection

MPU Guard Pages (Best): Configure no-access MPU region below stack. Triggers MemManage fault on M3/M4/M7. Limited on M0/M0+.

Canary Values (Portable): Magic value (e.g.,

0xDEADBEEF

Watchdog: Indirect detection via timeout, provides recovery. Best: MPU guard pages, else canary + watchdog.

Imported: Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.