Awesome-omni-skills bitbucket-automation
Bitbucket Automation via Rube MCP workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Automate Bitbucket repositories, pull requests, branches, issues, and workspace management via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/bitbucket-automation" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-bitbucket-automation && rm -rf "$T"
skills/bitbucket-automation/SKILL.mdBitbucket Automation via Rube MCP
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/bitbucket-automation from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Bitbucket Automation via Rube MCP Automate Bitbucket operations including repository management, pull request workflows, branch operations, issue tracking, and workspace administration through Composio's Bitbucket toolkit.
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Prerequisites, Common Patterns, Known Pitfalls, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Automate Bitbucket repositories, pull requests, branches, issues, and workspace management via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
- Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
- Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
- Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
- Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- Verify Rube MCP is available by confirming RUBESEARCHTOOLS responds
- Call RUBEMANAGECONNECTIONS with toolkit bitbucket
- If connection is not ACTIVE, follow the returned auth link to complete Bitbucket OAuth
- Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows
- BITBUCKETLISTWORKSPACES - Discover accessible workspaces [Prerequisite]
- BITBUCKETLISTREPOSITORIESINWORKSPACE - Find the target repository [Prerequisite]
- BITBUCKETLISTBRANCHES - Verify source and destination branches exist [Prerequisite]
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Setup
Get Rube MCP: Add
https://rube.app/mcp as an MCP server in your client configuration. No API keys needed — just add the endpoint and it works.
- Verify Rube MCP is available by confirming
respondsRUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS - Call
with toolkitRUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSbitbucket - If connection is not ACTIVE, follow the returned auth link to complete Bitbucket OAuth
- Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows
Imported: Core Workflows
1. Manage Pull Requests
When to use: User wants to create, review, or inspect pull requests
Tool sequence:
- Discover accessible workspaces [Prerequisite]BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACES
- Find the target repository [Prerequisite]BITBUCKET_LIST_REPOSITORIES_IN_WORKSPACE
- Verify source and destination branches exist [Prerequisite]BITBUCKET_LIST_BRANCHES
- Create a new PR with title, source branch, and optional reviewers [Required]BITBUCKET_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST
- List PRs filtered by state (OPEN, MERGED, DECLINED) [Optional]BITBUCKET_LIST_PULL_REQUESTS
- Get full details of a specific PR by ID [Optional]BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST
- Fetch unified diff for code review [Optional]BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFF
- Get changed files with lines added/removed [Optional]BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFFSTAT
Key parameters:
: Workspace slug or UUID (required for all operations)workspace
: URL-friendly repository namerepo_slug
: Branch with changes to mergesource_branch
: Target branch (defaults to repo main branch if omitted)destination_branch
: List of objects withreviewers
field for reviewer assignmentuuid
: Filter for LIST_PULL_REQUESTS -state
,OPEN
, orMERGEDDECLINED
: Truncation limit for GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFF to handle large diffsmax_chars
Pitfalls:
expects an array of objects withreviewers
key, NOT usernames:uuid[{"uuid": "{...}"}]- UUID format must include curly braces:
{123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000}
defaults to the repo's main branch if omitted, which may not bedestination_branchmain
is an integer for GET/DIFF operations but comes back as part of PR listingpull_request_id- Large diffs can overwhelm context; always set
(e.g., 50000) on GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFFmax_chars
2. Manage Repositories and Workspaces
When to use: User wants to list, create, or delete repositories or explore workspaces
Tool sequence:
- List all accessible workspaces [Required]BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACES
- List repos with optional BBQL filtering [Required]BITBUCKET_LIST_REPOSITORIES_IN_WORKSPACE
- Create a new repo with language, privacy, and project settings [Optional]BITBUCKET_CREATE_REPOSITORY
- Permanently delete a repository (irreversible) [Optional]BITBUCKET_DELETE_REPOSITORY
- List members for reviewer assignment or access checks [Optional]BITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACE_MEMBERS
Key parameters:
: Workspace slug (find via LIST_WORKSPACES)workspace
: URL-friendly name for create/deleterepo_slug
: BBQL query filter (e.g.,q
,name~"api"
,project.key="PROJ"
)is_private=true
: Filter repos by user role:role
,member
,contributor
,adminowner
: Sort field with optionalsort
prefix for descending (e.g.,-
)-updated_on
: Boolean for repository visibility (defaults tois_private
)true
: Bitbucket project key; omit to use workspace's oldest projectproject_key
Pitfalls:
is irreversible and does not affect forksBITBUCKET_DELETE_REPOSITORY- BBQL string values MUST be enclosed in double quotes:
notname~"my-repo"name~my-repo
is NOT a valid BBQL field; userepository
insteadname- Default pagination is 10 results; set
explicitly for complete listingspagelen
defaults to private; setCREATE_REPOSITORY
for public reposis_private: false
3. Manage Issues
When to use: User wants to create, update, list, or comment on repository issues
Tool sequence:
- List issues with optional filters for state, priority, kind, assignee [Required]BITBUCKET_LIST_ISSUES
- Create a new issue with title, content, priority, and kind [Required]BITBUCKET_CREATE_ISSUE
- Modify issue attributes (state, priority, assignee, etc.) [Optional]BITBUCKET_UPDATE_ISSUE
- Add a markdown comment to an existing issue [Optional]BITBUCKET_CREATE_ISSUE_COMMENT
- Permanently delete an issue [Optional]BITBUCKET_DELETE_ISSUE
Key parameters:
: String identifier for the issueissue_id
,title
: Required for creationcontent
:kind
,bug
,enhancement
, orproposaltask
:priority
,trivial
,minor
,major
, orcriticalblocker
:state
,new
,open
,resolved
,on hold
,invalid
,duplicate
,wontfixclosed
: Bitbucket username for CREATE;assignee
(UUID) for UPDATEassignee_account_id
: ISO 8601 format date stringdue_on
Pitfalls:
- Issue tracker must be enabled on the repository (
) or API calls will failhas_issues: true
usesCREATE_ISSUE
(username string), butassignee
usesUPDATE_ISSUE
(UUID) -- they are different fieldsassignee_account_id
is permanent with no undoDELETE_ISSUE
values include spaces:state
not"on hold""on_hold"- Filtering by
in LIST_ISSUES uses account ID, not username; useassignee
string for unassigned"null"
4. Manage Branches
When to use: User wants to create branches or explore branch structure
Tool sequence:
- List branches with optional BBQL filter and sorting [Required]BITBUCKET_LIST_BRANCHES
- Create a new branch from a specific commit hash [Required]BITBUCKET_CREATE_BRANCH
Key parameters:
: Branch name withoutname
prefix (e.g.,refs/heads/
)feature/new-login
: Full SHA1 commit hash to branch from (must exist in repo)target_hash
: BBQL filter (e.g.,q
,name~"feature/"
)name="main"
: Sort bysort
orname
(descending commit date)-target.date
: 1-100 results per page (default is 10)pagelen
Pitfalls:
requires a full commit hash, NOT a branch name asCREATE_BRANCHtarget_hash- Do NOT include
prefix in branch namesrefs/heads/ - Branch names must follow Bitbucket naming conventions (alphanumeric,
,/
,.
,_
)- - BBQL string values need double quotes:
notname~"feature/"name~feature/
5. Review Pull Requests with Comments
When to use: User wants to add review comments to pull requests, including inline code comments
Tool sequence:
- Get PR details and verify it exists [Prerequisite]BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST
- Review the actual code changes [Prerequisite]BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFF
- Get list of changed files [Optional]BITBUCKET_GET_PULL_REQUEST_DIFFSTAT
- Post review comments [Required]BITBUCKET_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST_COMMENT
Key parameters:
: String ID of the PRpull_request_id
: Markdown-formatted comment textcontent_raw
: Defaults tocontent_markup
; also supportsmarkdownplaintext
: Object withinline
,path
,from
for inline code commentsto
: Integer ID for threaded replies to existing commentsparent_comment_id
Pitfalls:
is a string in CREATE_PULL_REQUEST_COMMENT but an integer in GET_PULL_REQUESTpull_request_id- Inline comments require
at minimum;inline.path
/from
are optional line numbersto
creates a threaded reply; omit for top-level commentsparent_comment_id- Line numbers in inline comments reference the diff, not the source file
Imported: Prerequisites
- Rube MCP must be connected (RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS available)
- Active Bitbucket connection via
with toolkitRUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSbitbucket - Always call
first to get current tool schemasRUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @bitbucket-automation to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @bitbucket-automation against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @bitbucket-automation for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @bitbucket-automation using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
- Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
- Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
- Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/bitbucket-automation, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@azure-mgmt-apicenter-py
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@azure-mgmt-apimanagement-dotnet
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@azure-mgmt-apimanagement-py
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@azure-mgmt-applicationinsights-dotnet
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Quick Reference
| Task | Tool Slug | Key Params |
|---|---|---|
| List workspaces | | , |
| List repos | | , , |
| Create repo | | , , |
| Delete repo | | , |
| List branches | | , , |
| Create branch | | , , , |
| List PRs | | , , |
| Create PR | | , , , |
| Get PR details | | , , |
| Get PR diff | | , , , |
| Get PR diffstat | | , , |
| Comment on PR | | , , , |
| List issues | | , , , |
| Create issue | | , , , |
| Update issue | | , , |
| Comment on issue | | , , , |
| Delete issue | | , , |
| List members | | |
Imported: Common Patterns
ID Resolution
Always resolve human-readable names to IDs before operations:
- Workspace:
to get workspace slugsBITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACES - Repository:
withBITBUCKET_LIST_REPOSITORIES_IN_WORKSPACE
filter to find repo slugsq - Branch:
to verify branch existence before PR creationBITBUCKET_LIST_BRANCHES - Members:
to get UUIDs for reviewer assignmentBITBUCKET_LIST_WORKSPACE_MEMBERS
Pagination
Bitbucket uses page-based pagination (not cursor-based):
- Use
(starts at 1) andpage
(items per page) parameterspagelen - Default page size is typically 10; set
explicitly (max 50 for PRs, 100 for others)pagelen - Check response for
URL or total count to determine if more pages existnext - Always iterate through all pages for complete results
BBQL Filtering
Bitbucket Query Language is available on list endpoints:
- String values MUST use double quotes:
name~"pattern" - Operators:
(exact),=
(contains),~
(not equal),!=
,>
,>=
,<<= - Combine with
/AND
:ORname~"api" AND is_private=true
Imported: Known Pitfalls
ID Formats
- Workspace: slug string (e.g.,
) or UUID in braces (my-workspace
){uuid} - Reviewer UUIDs must include curly braces:
{123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000} - Issue IDs are strings; PR IDs are integers in some tools, strings in others
- Commit hashes must be full SHA1 (40 characters)
Parameter Quirks
vsassignee
: CREATE_ISSUE uses username, UPDATE_ISSUE uses UUIDassignee_account_id
values for issues include spaces:state
, not"on hold""on_hold"
omission defaults to repo main branch, notdestination_branch
literallymain- BBQL
is not a valid field -- userepositoryname
Rate Limits
- Bitbucket Cloud API has rate limits; large batch operations should include delays
- Paginated requests count against rate limits; minimize unnecessary page fetches
Destructive Operations
is irreversible and does not remove forksBITBUCKET_DELETE_REPOSITORY
is permanent with no recovery optionBITBUCKET_DELETE_ISSUE- Always confirm with the user before executing delete operations
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.