Awesome-omni-skills cc-skill-backend-patterns
Backend Development Patterns workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Backend architecture patterns, API design, database optimization, and server-side best practices for Node.js, Express, and Next.js API routes and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/cc-skill-backend-patterns" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-cc-skill-backend-patterns && rm -rf "$T"
skills/cc-skill-backend-patterns/SKILL.mdBackend Development Patterns
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/cc-skill-backend-patterns from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Backend Development Patterns Backend architecture patterns and best practices for scalable server-side applications.
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: API Design Patterns, Database Patterns, Caching Strategies, Error Handling Patterns, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Backend architecture patterns, API design, database optimization, and server-side best practices for Node.js, Express, and Next.js API routes.
- Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
- Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
- Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
- Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
- Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
- Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
- Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
- Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
- Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
- Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: API Design Patterns
RESTful API Structure
// ✅ Resource-based URLs GET /api/markets # List resources GET /api/markets/:id # Get single resource POST /api/markets # Create resource PUT /api/markets/:id # Replace resource PATCH /api/markets/:id # Update resource DELETE /api/markets/:id # Delete resource // ✅ Query parameters for filtering, sorting, pagination GET /api/markets?status=active&sort=volume&limit=20&offset=0
Repository Pattern
// Abstract data access logic interface MarketRepository { findAll(filters?: MarketFilters): Promise<Market[]> findById(id: string): Promise<Market | null> create(data: CreateMarketDto): Promise<Market> update(id: string, data: UpdateMarketDto): Promise<Market> delete(id: string): Promise<void> } class SupabaseMarketRepository implements MarketRepository { async findAll(filters?: MarketFilters): Promise<Market[]> { let query = supabase.from('markets').select('*') if (filters?.status) { query = query.eq('status', filters.status) } if (filters?.limit) { query = query.limit(filters.limit) } const { data, error } = await query if (error) throw new Error(error.message) return data } // Other methods... }
Service Layer Pattern
// Business logic separated from data access class MarketService { constructor(private marketRepo: MarketRepository) {} async searchMarkets(query: string, limit: number = 10): Promise<Market[]> { // Business logic const embedding = await generateEmbedding(query) const results = await this.vectorSearch(embedding, limit) // Fetch full data const markets = await this.marketRepo.findByIds(results.map(r => r.id)) // Sort by similarity return markets.sort((a, b) => { const scoreA = results.find(r => r.id === a.id)?.score || 0 const scoreB = results.find(r => r.id === b.id)?.score || 0 return scoreA - scoreB }) } private async vectorSearch(embedding: number[], limit: number) { // Vector search implementation } }
Middleware Pattern
// Request/response processing pipeline export function withAuth(handler: NextApiHandler): NextApiHandler { return async (req, res) => { const token = req.headers.authorization?.replace('Bearer ', '') if (!token) { return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }) } try { const user = await verifyToken(token) req.user = user return handler(req, res) } catch (error) { return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid token' }) } } } // Usage export default withAuth(async (req, res) => { // Handler has access to req.user })
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @cc-skill-backend-patterns to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @cc-skill-backend-patterns against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @cc-skill-backend-patterns for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @cc-skill-backend-patterns using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
- Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
- Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
- Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/cc-skill-backend-patterns, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@burp-suite-testing
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@burpsuite-project-parser
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@business-analyst
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@busybox-on-windows
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Database Patterns
Query Optimization
// ✅ GOOD: Select only needed columns const { data } = await supabase .from('markets') .select('id, name, status, volume') .eq('status', 'active') .order('volume', { ascending: false }) .limit(10) // ❌ BAD: Select everything const { data } = await supabase .from('markets') .select('*')
N+1 Query Prevention
// ❌ BAD: N+1 query problem const markets = await getMarkets() for (const market of markets) { market.creator = await getUser(market.creator_id) // N queries } // ✅ GOOD: Batch fetch const markets = await getMarkets() const creatorIds = markets.map(m => m.creator_id) const creators = await getUsers(creatorIds) // 1 query const creatorMap = new Map(creators.map(c => [c.id, c])) markets.forEach(market => { market.creator = creatorMap.get(market.creator_id) })
Transaction Pattern
async function createMarketWithPosition( marketData: CreateMarketDto, positionData: CreatePositionDto ) { // Use Supabase transaction const { data, error } = await supabase.rpc('create_market_with_position', { market_data: marketData, position_data: positionData }) if (error) throw new Error('Transaction failed') return data } // SQL function in Supabase CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION create_market_with_position( market_data jsonb, position_data jsonb ) RETURNS jsonb LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ BEGIN -- Start transaction automatically INSERT INTO markets VALUES (market_data); INSERT INTO positions VALUES (position_data); RETURN jsonb_build_object('success', true); EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN -- Rollback happens automatically RETURN jsonb_build_object('success', false, 'error', SQLERRM); END; $$;
Imported: Caching Strategies
Redis Caching Layer
class CachedMarketRepository implements MarketRepository { constructor( private baseRepo: MarketRepository, private redis: RedisClient ) {} async findById(id: string): Promise<Market | null> { // Check cache first const cached = await this.redis.get(`market:${id}`) if (cached) { return JSON.parse(cached) } // Cache miss - fetch from database const market = await this.baseRepo.findById(id) if (market) { // Cache for 5 minutes await this.redis.setex(`market:${id}`, 300, JSON.stringify(market)) } return market } async invalidateCache(id: string): Promise<void> { await this.redis.del(`market:${id}`) } }
Cache-Aside Pattern
async function getMarketWithCache(id: string): Promise<Market> { const cacheKey = `market:${id}` // Try cache const cached = await redis.get(cacheKey) if (cached) return JSON.parse(cached) // Cache miss - fetch from DB const market = await db.markets.findUnique({ where: { id } }) if (!market) throw new Error('Market not found') // Update cache await redis.setex(cacheKey, 300, JSON.stringify(market)) return market }
Imported: Error Handling Patterns
Centralized Error Handler
class ApiError extends Error { constructor( public statusCode: number, public message: string, public isOperational = true ) { super(message) Object.setPrototypeOf(this, ApiError.prototype) } } export function errorHandler(error: unknown, req: Request): Response { if (error instanceof ApiError) { return NextResponse.json({ success: false, error: error.message }, { status: error.statusCode }) } if (error instanceof z.ZodError) { return NextResponse.json({ success: false, error: 'Validation failed', details: error.errors }, { status: 400 }) } // Log unexpected errors console.error('Unexpected error:', error) return NextResponse.json({ success: false, error: 'Internal server error' }, { status: 500 }) } // Usage export async function GET(request: Request) { try { const data = await fetchData() return NextResponse.json({ success: true, data }) } catch (error) { return errorHandler(error, request) } }
Retry with Exponential Backoff
async function fetchWithRetry<T>( fn: () => Promise<T>, maxRetries = 3 ): Promise<T> { let lastError: Error for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++) { try { return await fn() } catch (error) { lastError = error as Error if (i < maxRetries - 1) { // Exponential backoff: 1s, 2s, 4s const delay = Math.pow(2, i) * 1000 await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay)) } } } throw lastError! } // Usage const data = await fetchWithRetry(() => fetchFromAPI())
Imported: Authentication & Authorization
JWT Token Validation
import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken' interface JWTPayload { userId: string email: string role: 'admin' | 'user' } export function verifyToken(token: string): JWTPayload { try { const payload = jwt.verify(token, process.env.JWT_SECRET!) as JWTPayload return payload } catch (error) { throw new ApiError(401, 'Invalid token') } } export async function requireAuth(request: Request) { const token = request.headers.get('authorization')?.replace('Bearer ', '') if (!token) { throw new ApiError(401, 'Missing authorization token') } return verifyToken(token) } // Usage in API route export async function GET(request: Request) { const user = await requireAuth(request) const data = await getDataForUser(user.userId) return NextResponse.json({ success: true, data }) }
Role-Based Access Control
type Permission = 'read' | 'write' | 'delete' | 'admin' interface User { id: string role: 'admin' | 'moderator' | 'user' } const rolePermissions: Record<User['role'], Permission[]> = { admin: ['read', 'write', 'delete', 'admin'], moderator: ['read', 'write', 'delete'], user: ['read', 'write'] } export function hasPermission(user: User, permission: Permission): boolean { return rolePermissions[user.role].includes(permission) } export function requirePermission(permission: Permission) { return async (request: Request) => { const user = await requireAuth(request) if (!hasPermission(user, permission)) { throw new ApiError(403, 'Insufficient permissions') } return user } } // Usage export const DELETE = requirePermission('delete')(async (request: Request) => { // Handler with permission check })
Imported: Rate Limiting
Simple In-Memory Rate Limiter
class RateLimiter { private requests = new Map<string, number[]>() async checkLimit( identifier: string, maxRequests: number, windowMs: number ): Promise<boolean> { const now = Date.now() const requests = this.requests.get(identifier) || [] // Remove old requests outside window const recentRequests = requests.filter(time => now - time < windowMs) if (recentRequests.length >= maxRequests) { return false // Rate limit exceeded } // Add current request recentRequests.push(now) this.requests.set(identifier, recentRequests) return true } } const limiter = new RateLimiter() export async function GET(request: Request) { const ip = request.headers.get('x-forwarded-for') || 'unknown' const allowed = await limiter.checkLimit(ip, 100, 60000) // 100 req/min if (!allowed) { return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Rate limit exceeded' }, { status: 429 }) } // Continue with request }
Imported: Background Jobs & Queues
Simple Queue Pattern
class JobQueue<T> { private queue: T[] = [] private processing = false async add(job: T): Promise<void> { this.queue.push(job) if (!this.processing) { this.process() } } private async process(): Promise<void> { this.processing = true while (this.queue.length > 0) { const job = this.queue.shift()! try { await this.execute(job) } catch (error) { console.error('Job failed:', error) } } this.processing = false } private async execute(job: T): Promise<void> { // Job execution logic } } // Usage for indexing markets interface IndexJob { marketId: string } const indexQueue = new JobQueue<IndexJob>() export async function POST(request: Request) { const { marketId } = await request.json() // Add to queue instead of blocking await indexQueue.add({ marketId }) return NextResponse.json({ success: true, message: 'Job queued' }) }
Imported: Logging & Monitoring
Structured Logging
interface LogContext { userId?: string requestId?: string method?: string path?: string [key: string]: unknown } class Logger { log(level: 'info' | 'warn' | 'error', message: string, context?: LogContext) { const entry = { timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), level, message, ...context } console.log(JSON.stringify(entry)) } info(message: string, context?: LogContext) { this.log('info', message, context) } warn(message: string, context?: LogContext) { this.log('warn', message, context) } error(message: string, error: Error, context?: LogContext) { this.log('error', message, { ...context, error: error.message, stack: error.stack }) } } const logger = new Logger() // Usage export async function GET(request: Request) { const requestId = crypto.randomUUID() logger.info('Fetching markets', { requestId, method: 'GET', path: '/api/markets' }) try { const markets = await fetchMarkets() return NextResponse.json({ success: true, data: markets }) } catch (error) { logger.error('Failed to fetch markets', error as Error, { requestId }) return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Internal error' }, { status: 500 }) } }
Remember: Backend patterns enable scalable, maintainable server-side applications. Choose patterns that fit your complexity level.
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.