Awesome-omni-skills cc-skill-project-guidelines-example
Project Guidelines Skill (Example) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Project Guidelines Skill (Example) and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/cc-skill-project-guidelines-example" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-cc-skill-project-guidelines-example && rm -rf "$T"
skills/cc-skill-project-guidelines-example/SKILL.mdProject Guidelines Skill (Example)
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/cc-skill-project-guidelines-example from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Project Guidelines Skill (Example) This is an example of a project-specific skill. Use this as a template for your own projects. Based on a real production application: Zenith - AI-powered customer discovery platform. ---
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Architecture Overview, File Structure, Code Patterns, Testing Requirements, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- Architecture overview
- File structure
- Code patterns
- Testing requirements
- Deployment workflow
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Project Guidelines Skill (Example).
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- All tests passing locally
- npm run build succeeds (frontend)
- poetry run pytest passes (backend)
- No hardcoded secrets
- Environment variables documented
- Database migrations ready
- Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Deployment Workflow
Pre-Deployment Checklist
- All tests passing locally
-
succeeds (frontend)npm run build -
passes (backend)poetry run pytest - No hardcoded secrets
- Environment variables documented
- Database migrations ready
Deployment Commands
# Build and deploy frontend cd frontend && npm run build gcloud run deploy frontend --source . # Build and deploy backend cd backend gcloud run deploy backend --source .
Environment Variables
# Frontend (.env.local) NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL=https://api.example.com NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL=https://xxx.supabase.co NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY=eyJ... # Backend (.env) DATABASE_URL=postgresql://... ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... SUPABASE_URL=https://xxx.supabase.co SUPABASE_KEY=eyJ...
Imported: Architecture Overview
Tech Stack:
- Frontend: Next.js 15 (App Router), TypeScript, React
- Backend: FastAPI (Python), Pydantic models
- Database: Supabase (PostgreSQL)
- AI: Claude API with tool calling and structured output
- Deployment: Google Cloud Run
- Testing: Playwright (E2E), pytest (backend), React Testing Library
Services:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Frontend │ │ Next.js 15 + TypeScript + TailwindCSS │ │ Deployed: Vercel / Cloud Run │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Backend │ │ FastAPI + Python 3.11 + Pydantic │ │ Deployed: Cloud Run │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌───────────────┼───────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ Supabase │ │ Claude │ │ Redis │ │ Database │ │ API │ │ Cache │ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @cc-skill-project-guidelines-example to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @cc-skill-project-guidelines-example against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @cc-skill-project-guidelines-example for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @cc-skill-project-guidelines-example using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- No emojis in code, comments, or documentation
- Immutability - never mutate objects or arrays
- TDD - write tests before implementation
- 80% coverage minimum
- Many small files - 200-400 lines typical, 800 max
- No console.log in production code
- Proper error handling with try/catch
Imported Operating Notes
Imported: Critical Rules
- No emojis in code, comments, or documentation
- Immutability - never mutate objects or arrays
- TDD - write tests before implementation
- 80% coverage minimum
- Many small files - 200-400 lines typical, 800 max
- No console.log in production code
- Proper error handling with try/catch
- Input validation with Pydantic/Zod
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/cc-skill-project-guidelines-example, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@burp-suite-testing
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@burpsuite-project-parser
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@business-analyst
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@busybox-on-windows
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: File Structure
project/ ├── frontend/ │ └── src/ │ ├── app/ # Next.js app router pages │ │ ├── api/ # API routes │ │ ├── (auth)/ # Auth-protected routes │ │ └── workspace/ # Main app workspace │ ├── components/ # React components │ │ ├── ui/ # Base UI components │ │ ├── forms/ # Form components │ │ └── layouts/ # Layout components │ ├── hooks/ # Custom React hooks │ ├── lib/ # Utilities │ ├── types/ # TypeScript definitions │ └── config/ # Configuration │ ├── backend/ │ ├── routers/ # FastAPI route handlers │ ├── models.py # Pydantic models │ ├── main.py # FastAPI app entry │ ├── auth_system.py # Authentication │ ├── database.py # Database operations │ ├── services/ # Business logic │ └── tests/ # pytest tests │ ├── deploy/ # Deployment configs ├── docs/ # Documentation └── scripts/ # Utility scripts
Imported: Code Patterns
API Response Format (FastAPI)
from pydantic import BaseModel from typing import Generic, TypeVar, Optional T = TypeVar('T') class ApiResponse(BaseModel, Generic[T]): success: bool data: Optional[T] = None error: Optional[str] = None @classmethod def ok(cls, data: T) -> "ApiResponse[T]": return cls(success=True, data=data) @classmethod def fail(cls, error: str) -> "ApiResponse[T]": return cls(success=False, error=error)
Frontend API Calls (TypeScript)
interface ApiResponse<T> { success: boolean data?: T error?: string } async function fetchApi<T>( endpoint: string, options?: RequestInit ): Promise<ApiResponse<T>> { try { const response = await fetch(`/api${endpoint}`, { ...options, headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', ...options?.headers, }, }) if (!response.ok) { return { success: false, error: `HTTP ${response.status}` } } return await response.json() } catch (error) { return { success: false, error: String(error) } } }
Claude AI Integration (Structured Output)
from anthropic import Anthropic from pydantic import BaseModel class AnalysisResult(BaseModel): summary: str key_points: list[str] confidence: float async def analyze_with_claude(content: str) -> AnalysisResult: client = Anthropic() response = client.messages.create( model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250514", max_tokens=1024, messages=[{"role": "user", "content": content}], tools=[{ "name": "provide_analysis", "description": "Provide structured analysis", "input_schema": AnalysisResult.model_json_schema() }], tool_choice={"type": "tool", "name": "provide_analysis"} ) # Extract tool use result tool_use = next( block for block in response.content if block.type == "tool_use" ) return AnalysisResult(**tool_use.input)
Custom Hooks (React)
import { useState, useCallback } from 'react' interface UseApiState<T> { data: T | null loading: boolean error: string | null } export function useApi<T>( fetchFn: () => Promise<ApiResponse<T>> ) { const [state, setState] = useState<UseApiState<T>>({ data: null, loading: false, error: null, }) const execute = useCallback(async () => { setState(prev => ({ ...prev, loading: true, error: null })) const result = await fetchFn() if (result.success) { setState({ data: result.data!, loading: false, error: null }) } else { setState({ data: null, loading: false, error: result.error! }) } }, [fetchFn]) return { ...state, execute } }
Imported: Testing Requirements
Backend (pytest)
# Run all tests poetry run pytest tests/ # Run with coverage poetry run pytest tests/ --cov=. --cov-report=html # Run specific test file poetry run pytest tests/test_auth.py -v
Test structure:
import pytest from httpx import AsyncClient from main import app @pytest.fixture async def client(): async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as ac: yield ac @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_health_check(client: AsyncClient): response = await client.get("/health") assert response.status_code == 200 assert response.json()["status"] == "healthy"
Frontend (React Testing Library)
# Run tests npm run test # Run with coverage npm run test -- --coverage # Run E2E tests npm run test:e2e
Test structure:
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react' import { WorkspacePanel } from './WorkspacePanel' describe('WorkspacePanel', () => { it('renders workspace correctly', () => { render(<WorkspacePanel />) expect(screen.getByRole('main')).toBeInTheDocument() }) it('handles session creation', async () => { render(<WorkspacePanel />) fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('New Session')) expect(await screen.findByText('Session created')).toBeInTheDocument() }) })
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.