Awesome-omni-skills conductor-status

Conductor Status workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Display project status, active tracks, and next actions and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

install

source · Clone the upstream repo

git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills

Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/

T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/conductor-status" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-conductor-status && rm -rf "$T"

manifest: skills/conductor-status/SKILL.md

Conductor Status

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/conductor-status

from

https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json

plus

ORIGIN.md

as the provenance anchor for review.

Conductor Status Display the current status of the Conductor project, including overall progress, active tracks, and next actions.

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Pre-flight Checks, Data Collection, Output Format, Phase 1: {Phase Name} [COMPLETE], Phase 2: {Phase Name} [IN PROGRESS], Phase 3: {Phase Name} [PENDING].

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

Working on conductor status tasks or workflows
Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for conductor status
The task is unrelated to conductor status
You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Display project status, active tracks, and next actions.
Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.

Operating Table

Situation	Start here	Why it matters
First-time use	`metadata.json`	Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review	`ORIGIN.md`	Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution	`SKILL.md`	Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context	`SKILL.md`	Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision	`## Related Skills`	Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
Provide actionable steps and verification.
If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Instructions

Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
Provide actionable steps and verification.
If detailed examples are required, open
```
resources/implementation-playbook.md
```
.

Imported: Pre-flight Checks

Verify Conductor is initialized:
- Check
```
conductor/product.md
```
  exists
- Check
```
conductor/tracks.md
```
  exists
- If missing: Display error and suggest running
```
/conductor:setup
```
  first
Check for any tracks:
- Read
```
conductor/tracks.md
```
- If no tracks registered: Display setup complete message with suggestion to create first track

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @conductor-status to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @conductor-status against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @conductor-status for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @conductor-status using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/conductor-status

, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md

, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

```
@burp-suite-testing
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
```
@burpsuite-project-parser
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
```
@business-analyst
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
```
@busybox-on-windows
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Resource family	What it gives the reviewer	Example path
`references`	copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream	`references/n/a`
`examples`	worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream	`examples/n/a`
`scripts`	upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation	`scripts/n/a`
`agents`	routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package	`agents/n/a`
`assets`	supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package	`assets/n/a`

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Data Collection

1. Project Information

Read

conductor/product.md

and extract:

Project name
Project description

2. Tracks Overview

Read

conductor/tracks.md

and parse:

Total tracks count
Completed tracks (marked
```
[x]
```
)
In-progress tracks (marked
```
[~]
```
)
Pending tracks (marked
```
[ ]
```
)

3. Detailed Track Analysis

For each track in

conductor/tracks/

Read

conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md

Count total tasks (lines matching
```
- [x]
```
,
```
- [~]
```
,
```
- [ ]
```
with Task prefix)
Count completed tasks (
```
[x]
```
)
Count in-progress tasks (
```
[~]
```
)
Count pending tasks (
```
[ ]
```
)
Identify current phase (first phase with incomplete tasks)
Identify next pending task

Read

conductor/tracks/{trackId}/metadata.json

Track type (feature, bug, chore, refactor)
Created date
Last updated date
Status

Read

conductor/tracks/{trackId}/spec.md

Check for any noted blockers or dependencies

4. Blocker Detection

Scan for potential blockers:

Tasks marked with
```
BLOCKED:
```
prefix
Dependencies on incomplete tracks
Failed verification tasks

Imported: Output Format

Full Project Status (no argument)

================================================================================
                        PROJECT STATUS: {Project Name}
================================================================================
Last Updated: {current timestamp}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              OVERALL PROGRESS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tracks:     {completed}/{total} completed ({percentage}%)
Tasks:      {completed}/{total} completed ({percentage}%)

Progress:   [##########..........] {percentage}%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              TRACK SUMMARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Status | Track ID          | Type    | Tasks      | Last Updated |
|--------|-------------------|---------|------------|--------------|
| [x]    | auth_20250110     | feature | 12/12 (100%)| 2025-01-12  |
| [~]    | dashboard_20250112| feature | 7/15 (47%) | 2025-01-15  |
| [ ]    | nav-fix_20250114  | bug     | 0/4 (0%)   | 2025-01-14  |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              CURRENT FOCUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Active Track:  dashboard_20250112 - Dashboard Feature
Current Phase: Phase 2: Core Components
Current Task:  [~] Task 2.3: Implement chart rendering

Progress in Phase:
  - [x] Task 2.1: Create dashboard layout
  - [x] Task 2.2: Add data fetching hooks
  - [~] Task 2.3: Implement chart rendering
  - [ ] Task 2.4: Add filter controls

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              NEXT ACTIONS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Complete: Task 2.3 - Implement chart rendering (dashboard_20250112)
2. Then: Task 2.4 - Add filter controls (dashboard_20250112)
3. After Phase 2: Phase verification checkpoint

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               BLOCKERS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

{If blockers found:}
! BLOCKED: Task 3.1 in dashboard_20250112 depends on api_20250111 (incomplete)

{If no blockers:}
No blockers identified.

================================================================================
Commands: /conductor:implement {trackId} | /conductor:new-track | /conductor:revert
================================================================================

Single Track Status (with track-id argument)

================================================================================
                    TRACK STATUS: {Track Title}
================================================================================
Track ID:    {trackId}
Type:        {feature|bug|chore|refactor}
Status:      {Pending|In Progress|Complete}
Created:     {date}
Updated:     {date}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              SPECIFICATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: {brief summary from spec.md}

Acceptance Criteria:
  - [x] {Criterion 1}
  - [ ] {Criterion 2}
  - [ ] {Criterion 3}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              IMPLEMENTATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Overall:    {completed}/{total} tasks ({percentage}%)
Progress:   [##########..........] {percentage}%

#### Imported: Phase 1: {Phase Name} [COMPLETE]

- [x] Task 1.1: {description}
  - [x] Task 1.2: {description}
  - [x] Verification: {description}

#### Imported: Phase 2: {Phase Name} [IN PROGRESS]

- [x] Task 2.1: {description}
  - [~] Task 2.2: {description}  <-- CURRENT
  - [ ] Task 2.3: {description}
  - [ ] Verification: {description}

#### Imported: Phase 3: {Phase Name} [PENDING]

- [ ] Task 3.1: {description}
  - [ ] Task 3.2: {description}
  - [ ] Verification: {description}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              GIT HISTORY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related Commits:
  abc1234 - feat: add login form ({trackId})
  def5678 - feat: add password validation ({trackId})
  ghi9012 - chore: mark task 1.2 complete ({trackId})

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              NEXT STEPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Current: Task 2.2 - {description}
2. Next: Task 2.3 - {description}
3. Phase 2 verification pending

================================================================================
Commands: /conductor:implement {trackId} | /conductor:revert {trackId}
================================================================================

Imported: Status Markers Legend

Display at bottom if helpful:

Legend:
  [x] = Complete
  [~] = In Progress
  [ ] = Pending
  [!] = Blocked

Imported: Error States

No Tracks Found

================================================================================
                        PROJECT STATUS: {Project Name}
================================================================================

Conductor is set up but no tracks have been created yet.

To get started:
  /conductor:new-track "your feature description"

================================================================================

Conductor Not Initialized

ERROR: Conductor not initialized

Could not find conductor/product.md

Run /conductor:setup to initialize Conductor for this project.

Track Not Found (with argument)

ERROR: Track not found: {argument}

Available tracks:
  - auth_20250115
  - dashboard_20250112
  - nav-fix_20250114

Usage: /conductor:status [track-id]

Imported: Calculation Logic

Task Counting

For each plan.md:
  - Complete: count lines matching /^- \[x\] Task/
  - In Progress: count lines matching /^- \[~\] Task/
  - Pending: count lines matching /^- \[ \] Task/
  - Total: Complete + In Progress + Pending

Phase Detection

Current phase = first phase header followed by any incomplete task ([ ] or [~])

Progress Bar

filled = floor((completed / total) * 20)
empty = 20 - filled
bar = "[" + "#".repeat(filled) + ".".repeat(empty) + "]"

Imported: Quick Mode

If invoked with

--quick

-q

{Project Name}: {completed}/{total} tasks ({percentage}%)
Active: {trackId} - Task {X.Y}

Imported: JSON Output

If invoked with

--json

{
  "project": "{name}",
  "timestamp": "ISO_TIMESTAMP",
  "tracks": {
    "total": N,
    "completed": X,
    "in_progress": Y,
    "pending": Z
  },
  "tasks": {
    "total": M,
    "completed": A,
    "in_progress": B,
    "pending": C
  },
  "current": {
    "track": "{trackId}",
    "phase": N,
    "task": "{X.Y}"
  },
  "blockers": []
}

Imported: Limitations

Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.