Awesome-omni-skills faf-expert
FAF Expert - Advanced AI Context Architecture workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Advanced .faf (Foundational AI-context Format) specialist. IANA-registered format, MCP server config, championship scoring, bi-directional sync and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/faf-expert" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-faf-expert && rm -rf "$T"
skills/faf-expert/SKILL.mdFAF Expert - Advanced AI Context Architecture
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/faf-expert from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
FAF Expert - Advanced AI Context Architecture Master the IANA-registered format that makes AI understand your projects. Transform any codebase into an AI-intelligent project with persistent context that survives across sessions, tools, and AI platforms. Expert-level control over the foundational layer that powers modern AI development workflows.
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Core Capabilities, Getting Started, Success Metrics, Platform Compatibility, Advanced Patterns, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- Scenario - What FAF Expert Provides
- Complex project setup - Expert configuration of .faf files and MCP servers
- Championship scoring - Achieve 85%+ AI-readiness scores for production projects
- Multi-AI workflows - Universal context that works across Claude, Cursor, Gemini, Windsurf
- Legacy codebase revival - Transform archaeology into AI-readable project DNA
- Team collaboration - Standardized context format for consistent AI assistance
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
- Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
- Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
- Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
- Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
- Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
- Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Core Capabilities
🏆 Championship Scoring System
- Gold Tier (95%+): Production-ready AI context
- Silver Tier (85%+): Professional development standard
- Bronze Tier (70%+): Solid foundation for AI assistance
🔧 MCP Server Configuration
Expert setup of claude-faf-mcp with 33 tools:
{ "mcpServers": { "faf": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "claude-faf-mcp@latest"] } } }
🔄 Bi-Directional Sync
Keep context synchronized across platforms:
↔.fafCLAUDE.md
↔.faf.cursorrules
↔.fafGEMINI.md
↔.fafAGENTS.md
📊 Mk4 Architecture Framework
33-slot IANA format for comprehensive project context:
- Project identity and goals
- Technical stack detection
- Human context (who/what/why/where/when/how)
- Architecture patterns
- Deployment configuration
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @faf-expert to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @faf-expert against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @faf-expert for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @faf-expert using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Imported Usage Notes
Imported: Real-World Examples
Example 1: Legacy Enterprise Java System
# Achieved: 92% Gold tier with FAF Expert project: name: enterprise-payment-api goal: Mission-critical payment processing system stack: backend: java-spring database: oracle runtime: java-11 deployment: kubernetes human_context: where: AWS EKS production cluster when: Legacy system from 2018, modernizing 2026 how: Spring Boot 2.7, Oracle 19c, Docker containerization
Example 2: Modern React Dashboard
# Achieved: 97% Gold tier performance project: name: analytics-dashboard goal: Real-time analytics for SaaS platform stack: frontend: react-18 css_framework: tailwind state: zustand build: vite testing: vitest deployment: vercel
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
- Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
- Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
- Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/faf-expert, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@devops-deploy
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@devops-troubleshooter
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@differential-review
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@discord-automation
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Expert Resources
- Documentation: https://faf.one
- MCP Registry: Official Anthropic steward
- CLI Reference:
faf --help - Community: Discord server with 1000+ developers
- Enterprise: Professional support available
Imported: Getting Started
Quick Installation
# Install FAF CLI npm install -g faf-cli # Initialize your project faf init # Score AI-readiness faf score --details # Set up MCP server faf mcp install
Expert Commands
# Advanced scoring with breakdown faf score --championship --verbose # Multi-platform sync faf bi-sync --target all # Validate format compliance faf validate --strict # Enhanced AI optimization faf enhance --model claude --focus completeness
Imported: Success Metrics
Real Performance Data:
- 52k+ downloads across FAF ecosystem
- 800+ comprehensive tests (CLI + MCP)
- IANA-registered format (application/vnd.faf+yaml)
- 153+ validated formats supported
- Championship-grade performance (<50ms execution)
Imported: Platform Compatibility
Supported AI Tools
- ✅ Claude Code - Native MCP integration
- ✅ Cursor - .cursorrules sync
- ✅ Gemini CLI - GEMINI.md sync
- ✅ Windsurf - .windsurfrules support
- ✅ Universal - Works with any AI that reads YAML
MCP Servers Available
- 33 tools, 391 testsclaude-faf-mcp
- xAI/Grok optimizedgrok-faf-mcp
- Native performance (4.3MB binary)rust-faf-mcp
- Google Gemini integrationgemini-faf-mcp
Imported: Advanced Patterns
Enterprise Configuration
faf_version: "3.0" project: name: enterprise-platform tier: production human_context: team_size: 50+ compliance: SOC2, HIPAA deployment: multi-region stack: architecture: microservices orchestration: kubernetes monitoring: datadog security: vault
Legacy System Revival
# Transform 10-year-old codebase to AI-ready project: archaeology: true modernization_target: 2026 stack: legacy: php-5.6 migration_path: laravel-11 database_upgrade: mysql-8
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.