Awesome-omni-skills game-art

Game Art Principles workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Game art principles. Visual style selection, asset pipeline, animation workflow and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/game-art" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-game-art && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/game-art/SKILL.md
source content

Game Art Principles

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/game-development/game-art
from
https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json
plus
ORIGIN.md
as the provenance anchor for review.

Game Art Principles > Visual design thinking for games - style selection, asset pipelines, and art direction. ---

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: 1. Art Style Selection, 2. Asset Pipeline Decisions, 3. Color Theory Decisions, 5. Resolution & Scale Decisions, 6. Asset Organization, 7. Anti-Patterns.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

  • This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
  • Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Game art principles. Visual style selection, asset pipeline, animation workflow.
  • Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
  • Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
  • Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
  • Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.

Operating Table

SituationStart hereWhy it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
SKILL.md
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
SKILL.md
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

  1. Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
  2. Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
  3. Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
  4. Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
  5. Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
  6. Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
  7. Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: 1. Art Style Selection

Decision Tree

What feeling should the game evoke?
│
├── Nostalgic / Retro
│   ├── Limited palette? → Pixel Art
│   └── Hand-drawn feel? → Vector / Flash style
│
├── Realistic / Immersive
│   ├── High budget? → PBR 3D
│   └── Stylized realism? → Hand-painted textures
│
├── Approachable / Casual
│   ├── Clean shapes? → Flat / Minimalist
│   └── Soft feel? → Gradient / Soft shadows
│
└── Unique / Experimental
    └── Define custom style guide

Style Comparison Matrix

StyleProduction SpeedSkill FloorScalabilityBest For
Pixel ArtMediumMediumHard to hireIndie, retro
Vector/FlatFastLowEasyMobile, casual
Hand-paintedSlowHighMediumFantasy, stylized
PBR 3DSlowHighAAA pipelineRealistic games
Low-polyFastMediumEasyIndie 3D
Cel-shadedMediumMediumMediumAnime, cartoon

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @game-art to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @game-art against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @game-art for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @game-art using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

  • Principle - Game Application
  • Squash & Stretch - Jump arcs, impacts
  • Anticipation - Wind-up before attack
  • Staging - Clear silhouettes
  • Follow-through - Hair, capes after movement
  • Slow in/out - Easing on transitions
  • Arcs - Natural movement paths

Imported Operating Notes

Imported: 4. Animation Principles

The 12 Principles (Applied to Games)

PrincipleGame Application
Squash & StretchJump arcs, impacts
AnticipationWind-up before attack
StagingClear silhouettes
Follow-throughHair, capes after movement
Slow in/outEasing on transitions
ArcsNatural movement paths
Secondary ActionBreathing, blinking
TimingFrame count = weight/speed
ExaggerationReadable from distance
AppealMemorable design

Frame Count Guidelines

Action TypeTypical FramesFeel
Idle breathing4-8Subtle
Walk cycle6-12Smooth
Run cycle4-8Energetic
Attack3-6Snappy
Death8-16Dramatic

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/game-development/game-art
, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open
metadata.json
,
ORIGIN.md
, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md
, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

  • @2d-games
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @3d-games
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @daily-gift
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @design-taste-frontend
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Resource familyWhat it gives the reviewerExample path
references
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream
references/n/a
examples
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream
examples/n/a
scripts
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation
scripts/n/a
agents
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package
agents/n/a
assets
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package
assets/n/a

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: 2. Asset Pipeline Decisions

2D Pipeline

PhaseTool OptionsOutput
ConceptPaper, Procreate, PhotoshopReference sheet
CreationAseprite, Photoshop, KritaIndividual sprites
AtlasTexturePacker, AsepriteSpritesheet
AnimationSpine, DragonBones, Frame-by-frameAnimation data
IntegrationEngine importGame-ready assets

3D Pipeline

PhaseTool OptionsOutput
Concept2D art, BlockoutReference
ModelingBlender, Maya, 3ds MaxHigh-poly mesh
RetopologyBlender, ZBrushGame-ready mesh
UV/TexturingSubstance Painter, BlenderTexture maps
RiggingBlender, MayaSkeletal rig
AnimationBlender, Maya, MixamoAnimation clips
ExportFBX, glTFEngine-ready

Imported: 3. Color Theory Decisions

Palette Selection

GoalStrategyExample
HarmonyComplementary or analogousNature games
ContrastHigh saturation differencesAction games
MoodWarm/cool temperatureHorror, cozy
ReadabilityValue contrast over hueGameplay clarity

Color Principles

  • Hierarchy: Important elements should pop
  • Consistency: Same object = same color family
  • Context: Colors read differently on backgrounds
  • Accessibility: Don't rely only on color

Imported: 5. Resolution & Scale Decisions

2D Resolution by Platform

PlatformBase ResolutionSprite Scale
Mobile1080p64-128px characters
Desktop1080p-4K128-256px characters
Pixel art320x180 to 640x36016-32px characters

Consistency Rule

Choose a base unit and stick to it:

  • Pixel art: Work at 1x, scale up (never down)
  • HD art: Define DPI, maintain ratio
  • 3D: 1 unit = 1 meter (industry standard)

Imported: 6. Asset Organization

Naming Convention

[type]_[object]_[variant]_[state].[ext]

Examples:
spr_player_idle_01.png
tex_stone_wall_normal.png
mesh_tree_oak_lod2.fbx

Folder Structure Principle

assets/
├── characters/
│   ├── player/
│   └── enemies/
├── environment/
│   ├── props/
│   └── tiles/
├── ui/
├── effects/
└── audio/

Imported: 7. Anti-Patterns

Don'tDo
Mix art styles randomlyDefine and follow style guide
Work at final resolution onlyCreate at source resolution
Ignore silhouette readabilityTest at gameplay distance
Over-detail backgroundFocus detail on player area
Skip color testingTest on target display

Remember: Art serves gameplay. If it doesn't help the player, it's decoration.

Imported: Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.