Awesome-omni-skills gemini-api-dev-v2
Gemini API Development Skill workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs The Gemini API provides access to Google's most advanced AI models. Key capabilities include: and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/gemini-api-dev-v2" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-gemini-api-dev-v2 && rm -rf "$T"
skills/gemini-api-dev-v2/SKILL.mdGemini API Development Skill
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/gemini-api-dev from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Gemini API Development Skill
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Current Gemini Models, SDKs, API spec (source of truth), How to use the Gemini API, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: The Gemini API provides access to Google's most advanced AI models. Key capabilities include:.
- Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
- Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
- Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
- Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
- Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
- Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
- Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
- Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
- Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
- Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Overview
The Gemini API provides access to Google's most advanced AI models. Key capabilities include:
- Text generation - Chat, completion, summarization
- Multimodal understanding - Process images, audio, video, and documents
- Function calling - Let the model invoke your functions
- Structured output - Generate valid JSON matching your schema
- Code execution - Run Python code in a sandboxed environment
- Context caching - Cache large contexts for efficiency
- Embeddings - Generate text embeddings for semantic search
Imported: Current Gemini Models
: 1M tokens, complex reasoning, coding, researchgemini-3-pro-preview
: 1M tokens, fast, balanced performance, multimodalgemini-3-flash-preview
: 65k / 32k tokens, image generation and editinggemini-3-pro-image-preview
[!IMPORTANT] Models like
,gemini-2.5-*,gemini-2.0-*are legacy and deprecated. Use the new models above. Your knowledge is outdated.gemini-1.5-*
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @gemini-api-dev-v2 to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @gemini-api-dev-v2 against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @gemini-api-dev-v2 for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @gemini-api-dev-v2 using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Imported Usage Notes
Imported: Quick Start
Python
from google import genai client = genai.Client() response = client.models.generate_content( model="gemini-3-flash-preview", contents="Explain quantum computing" ) print(response.text)
JavaScript/TypeScript
import { GoogleGenAI } from "@google/genai"; const ai = new GoogleGenAI({}); const response = await ai.models.generateContent({ model: "gemini-3-flash-preview", contents: "Explain quantum computing" }); console.log(response.text);
Go
package main import ( "context" "fmt" "log" "google.golang.org/genai" ) func main() { ctx := context.Background() client, err := genai.NewClient(ctx, nil) if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } resp, err := client.Models.GenerateContent(ctx, "gemini-3-flash-preview", genai.Text("Explain quantum computing"), nil) if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } fmt.Println(resp.Text) }
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
- Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
- Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
- Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/gemini-api-dev, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@game-design-v2
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@gdb-cli-v2
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@gdpr-data-handling-v2
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@gemini-api-integration-v2
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: SDKs
- Python:
install withgoogle-genaipip install google-genai - JavaScript/TypeScript:
install with@google/genainpm install @google/genai - Go:
install withgoogle.golang.org/genaigo get google.golang.org/genai
[!WARNING] Legacy SDKs
(Python) andgoogle-generativeai(JS) are deprecated. Migrate to the new SDKs above urgently by following the Migration Guide.@google/generative-ai
Imported: API spec (source of truth)
Always use the latest REST API discovery spec as the source of truth for API definitions (request/response schemas, parameters, methods). Fetch the spec when implementing or debugging API integration:
- v1beta (default):
https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1beta
Use this unless the integration is explicitly pinned to v1. The official SDKs (google-genai, @google/genai, google.golang.org/genai) target v1beta. - v1:
https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1
Use only when the integration is specifically set to v1.
When in doubt, use v1beta. Refer to the spec for exact field names, types, and supported operations.
Imported: How to use the Gemini API
For detailed API documentation, fetch from the official docs index:
llms.txt URL:
https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/llms.txt
This index contains links to all documentation pages in
.md.txt format. Use web fetch tools to:
- Fetch
to discover available documentation pagesllms.txt - Fetch specific pages (e.g.,
)https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/function-calling.md.txt
Key Documentation Pages
[!IMPORTANT] Those are not all the documentation pages. Use the
index to discover available documentation pagesllms.txt
- Models
- Google AI Studio quickstart
- Nano Banana image generation
- Function calling with the Gemini API
- Structured outputs
- Text generation
- Image understanding
- Embeddings
- Interactions API
- SDK migration guide
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.