Awesome-omni-skills lead-magnets
Lead Magnets workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Plan and optimize lead magnets for email capture and lead generation. Use when designing gated content, checklists, templates, downloadable resources, or other offers that convert visitors into subscribers and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/lead-magnets" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-lead-magnets && rm -rf "$T"
skills/lead-magnets/SKILL.mdLead Magnets
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/lead-magnets from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Lead Magnets You are an expert in lead magnet strategy. Your goal is to help plan lead magnets that capture emails, generate qualified leads, and naturally lead to product adoption.
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Before Planning, Lead Magnet Types, Matching Lead Magnets to Buyer Stage, Gating Strategy, Landing Page & Delivery, Promotion & Distribution.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- Use when planning downloadable offers or gated resources for email capture.
- Use when the user wants a lead magnet strategy tied to conversion and product interest.
- Use when deciding what to give away, not just writing the asset itself.
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Plan and optimize lead magnets for email capture and lead generation. Use when designing gated content, checklists, templates, downloadable resources, or other offers that convert visitors into subscribers.
- Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
- Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
- Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
- Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
- Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
- Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
- Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
- Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Before Planning
Check for product marketing context first: If
.agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
1. Business Context
- What does the company do?
- Who is the ideal customer?
- What problems does your product solve?
2. Current Lead Generation
- How do you currently capture leads?
- What lead magnets or offers do you have?
- What's your current conversion rate on email capture?
3. Content Assets
- What existing content could be repurposed? (blog posts, guides, data)
- What expertise can you package?
- What templates or tools do you use internally?
4. Goals
- Primary goal: email list growth, lead quality, product education?
- Target audience stage: awareness, consideration, or decision?
- Timeline and resource constraints?
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @lead-magnets to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @lead-magnets against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @lead-magnets for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @lead-magnets using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Address one clear pain point, not a broad topic
- "How to write cold emails that get replies" > "Marketing guide"
- Awareness leads need education
- Consideration leads need comparison and evaluation
- Decision leads need implementation help
- Should look like it's worth paying for
- Consumable in under 30 minutes (ideally under 10)
Imported Operating Notes
Imported: Lead Magnet Principles
1. Solve a Specific Problem
- Address one clear pain point, not a broad topic
- "How to write cold emails that get replies" > "Marketing guide"
2. Match the Buyer Stage
- Awareness leads need education
- Consideration leads need comparison and evaluation
- Decision leads need implementation help
3. High Perceived Value, Low Time Investment
- Should look like it's worth paying for
- Consumable in under 30 minutes (ideally under 10)
- Immediate, actionable takeaway
4. Natural Path to Product
- Solves a problem your product also solves
- Creates awareness of a gap your product fills
- Demonstrates your expertise in the space
5. Easy to Consume
- One clear format (don't mix ebook + video + spreadsheet)
- Works on mobile
- No special software required
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/lead-magnets, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@base
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@calc
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@draw
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@image-studio
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Lead Magnet Types
| Type | Best For | Effort | Time to Create |
|---|---|---|---|
| Checklist | Quick wins, process steps | Low | 1-2 hours |
| Cheat sheet | Reference material, shortcuts | Low | 2-4 hours |
| Template (doc/spreadsheet/Notion) | Repeatable processes, workflows | Low-Med | 2-8 hours |
| Swipe file | Inspiration, examples | Medium | 4-8 hours |
| Ebook/guide | Deep education, authority | High | 1-3 weeks |
| Mini-course (email) | Education + nurture | Medium | 1-2 weeks |
| Mini-course (video) | Education + personality | High | 2-4 weeks |
| Quiz/assessment | Segmentation, engagement | Medium | 1-2 weeks |
| Webinar | Authority, live engagement | Medium | 1 week prep |
| Resource library | Ongoing value, return visits | High | Ongoing |
| Free trial/community access | Product experience | Varies | Varies |
For detailed creation guidance per format: See references/format-guide.md
Imported: Matching Lead Magnets to Buyer Stage
Awareness Stage
Goal: Educate on the problem. Attract people who don't know you yet.
| Format | Example |
|---|---|
| Checklist | "10-Point Website Audit Checklist" |
| Cheat sheet | "SEO Cheat Sheet for Beginners" |
| Ebook/guide | "The Complete Guide to Email Marketing" |
| Quiz | "What Type of Marketer Are You?" |
Consideration Stage
Goal: Help evaluate solutions. Build trust and demonstrate expertise.
| Format | Example |
|---|---|
| Comparison template | "CRM Comparison Spreadsheet" |
| Assessment | "Marketing Maturity Assessment" |
| Case study collection | "5 Companies That 3x'd Their Pipeline" |
| Webinar | "How to Choose the Right Analytics Tool" |
Decision Stage
Goal: Help implement. Remove friction to purchase.
| Format | Example |
|---|---|
| Template | "Ready-to-Use Sales Email Templates" |
| Free trial | "14-Day Free Trial" |
| Implementation guide | "Migration Checklist: Switch in 30 Minutes" |
| ROI calculator | "Calculate Your Savings" (→ see free-tool-strategy) |
Imported: Gating Strategy
Gating Options
| Approach | When to Use | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Full gate | High-value content, bottom-funnel | Max capture, lower reach |
| Partial gate | Preview + full version | Balance of reach and capture |
| Ungated + optional | Top-funnel education | Max reach, lower capture |
| Content upgrade | Blog post + bonus | Contextual, high-intent |
What to Ask For
- Email only — highest conversion, lowest friction
- Email + name — enables personalization, slight friction increase
- Email + company/role — better lead qualification, more friction
- Multi-field — only for high-value offers (webinars, demos)
Rule of thumb: Ask for the minimum needed. Every extra field reduces conversion by 5-10%.
How to Frame the Exchange
- Make the value obvious: "Get the full 25-page guide free"
- Show a preview: table of contents, first page, sample results
- Add social proof: "Downloaded by 5,000+ marketers"
- Reduce risk: "No spam. Unsubscribe anytime."
For form optimization: See form-cro skill For popup implementation: See popup-cro skill
Imported: Landing Page & Delivery
Landing Page Structure
- Headline — Clear benefit: what they'll get and why it matters
- Preview/mockup — Visual of the lead magnet (cover, screenshot, sample page)
- What's inside — 3-5 bullet points of key takeaways
- Social proof — Download count, testimonials, logos
- Form — Minimal fields, clear CTA button
- FAQ — Address hesitations (Is it really free? What format?)
For landing page optimization: See page-cro skill
Delivery Methods
| Method | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Instant download | Immediate gratification | No email verification |
| Email delivery | Verifies email, starts relationship | Slight delay |
| Thank you page + email | Best of both—instant access + email copy | Slightly more complex |
| Drip delivery | Builds habit, multiple touchpoints | Only for courses/series |
Thank You Page Optimization
Don't waste the thank you page. After they've converted:
- Confirm delivery ("Check your inbox")
- Offer a next step (book a demo, start trial, join community)
- Share on social (pre-written tweet/post)
- Recommend related content
Imported: Promotion & Distribution
Blog CTAs & Content Upgrades
- Add relevant CTAs within blog posts (inline, end-of-post)
- Create post-specific content upgrades (bonus checklist for a how-to post)
- Content upgrades convert 2-5x better than generic sidebar CTAs
Exit-Intent & Popups
- Trigger on exit intent or scroll depth
- Match the popup offer to the page content
- See popup-cro for implementation
Social Media
- Share snippets and teasers from the lead magnet
- Create carousel posts from key points
- Use the lead magnet as the CTA in your bio/profile
- See social-content for social strategy
Paid Promotion
- Facebook/Instagram lead ads for top-funnel lead magnets
- Google Ads for high-intent lead magnets (templates, tools)
- LinkedIn for B2B lead magnets
- Retarget blog visitors with lead magnet ads
- See paid-ads for campaign strategy
Partner Co-Promotion
- Cross-promote with complementary brands
- Guest webinars with partner audiences
- Include in partner newsletters
- Bundle in resource collections
Imported: Measuring Success
Key Metrics
| Metric | What It Tells You | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Landing page conversion rate | Offer attractiveness | 20-40% (warm traffic), 5-15% (cold) |
| Cost per lead | Acquisition efficiency | Varies by channel and industry |
| Lead-to-customer rate | Lead quality | 1-5% (B2B), varies widely |
| Email engagement | Content relevance | 30-50% open, 2-5% click |
| Time to conversion | Nurture effectiveness | Track by lead magnet source |
For detailed benchmarks by format and industry: See references/benchmarks.md
A/B Testing Ideas
- Headline: Benefit-focused vs. curiosity-driven
- Format: Checklist vs. guide on same topic
- Gate level: Full gate vs. partial preview
- Form fields: Email-only vs. email + name
- CTA copy: "Download Free Guide" vs. "Get Your Copy"
- Delivery: Instant download vs. email delivery
Lead Quality Signals
Good lead magnet attracted quality leads if:
- Higher-than-average email engagement
- Leads progress to trial/demo at expected rates
- Low unsubscribe rate after delivery
- Leads match ICP demographics
Imported: Output Format
When creating a lead magnet strategy, provide:
1. Lead Magnet Recommendation
- Format and topic
- Target buyer stage
- Why this format for this audience
- Estimated creation effort
2. Content Outline
- Key sections/components
- Length and scope
- What makes it unique or valuable
3. Gating & Capture Plan
- What to gate and how
- Form fields
- Landing page structure
4. Distribution Plan
- Promotion channels
- Content upgrade opportunities
- Paid amplification (if applicable)
5. Measurement Plan
- KPIs and targets
- What to A/B test first
Imported: Task-Specific Questions
- What existing content or expertise could you turn into a lead magnet?
- Where does your audience spend time online?
- What's the most common question prospects ask before buying?
- Do you have an email nurture sequence set up for new leads?
- What's your budget for design and promotion?
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.