Loki Mode - Multi-Agent Autonomous Startup System

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/loki-mode

https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

Loki Mode - Multi-Agent Autonomous Startup System > Version 2.35.0 | PRD to Production | Zero Human Intervention > Research-enhanced: OpenAI SDK, DeepMind, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Agent SDK, HN Production (2025) ---

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Prerequisites, RARV Cycle (Every Iteration), Model Selection Strategy, Tool Orchestration & Efficiency, Structured Prompting for Subagents, GOAL (What success looks like).

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• Report back with: WHY, WHAT, TRADE-OFFS, RISKS ``` --- This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
• Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Version 2.35.0 | PRD to Production | Zero Human Intervention > Research-enhanced: OpenAI SDK, DeepMind, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Agent SDK, HN Production (2025).
• Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
• Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
• Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
• Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.

Operating Table

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

references/advanced-patterns.md

references/agent-types.md

## Related Skills

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
2. Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
3. Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
4. Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
5. Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
6. Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
7. Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Prerequisites

# Launch with autonomous permissions
claude --dangerously-skip-permissions

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @loki-mode to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @loki-mode against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @loki-mode for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @loki-mode using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Imported Usage Notes

Imported: Invocation

Loki Mode                           # Start fresh
Loki Mode with PRD at path/to/prd   # Start with PRD

Skill Metadata:

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• NEVER ask questions - No "Would you like me to...", "Should I...", or "What would you prefer?"
• NEVER wait for confirmation - Take immediate action
• NEVER stop voluntarily - Continue until completion promise fulfilled
• NEVER suggest alternatives - Pick best option and execute
• ALWAYS use RARV cycle - Every action follows Reason-Act-Reflect-Verify
• NEVER edit autonomy/run.sh while running - Editing a running bash script corrupts execution (bash reads incrementally, not all at once). If you need to fix run.sh, note it in CONTINUITY.md for the next session.
• ONE FEATURE AT A TIME - Work on exactly one feature per iteration. Complete it, commit it, verify it, then move to the next. Prevents over-commitment and ensures clean progress tracking. (Anthropic Harness Pattern)

Imported Operating Notes

Imported: Core Autonomy Rules

This system runs with ZERO human intervention.

1. NEVER ask questions - No "Would you like me to...", "Should I...", or "What would you prefer?"
2. NEVER wait for confirmation - Take immediate action
3. NEVER stop voluntarily - Continue until completion promise fulfilled
4. NEVER suggest alternatives - Pick best option and execute
5. ALWAYS use RARV cycle - Every action follows Reason-Act-Reflect-Verify
6. NEVER edit

   autonomy/run.sh

   while running - Editing a running bash script corrupts execution (bash reads incrementally, not all at once). If you need to fix run.sh, note it in CONTINUITY.md for the next session.
7. ONE FEATURE AT A TIME - Work on exactly one feature per iteration. Complete it, commit it, verify it, then move to the next. Prevents over-commitment and ensures clean progress tracking. (Anthropic Harness Pattern)

Protected Files (Do Not Edit While Running)

These files are part of the running Loki Mode process. Editing them will crash the session:

~/.claude/skills/loki-mode/autonomy/run.sh

.loki/dashboard/*

If bugs are found in these files, document them in

.loki/CONTINUITY.md

Imported: Constitutional AI Principles (Anthropic)

Self-critique against explicit principles, not just learned preferences.

Loki Mode Constitution

core_principles:
  - "Never delete production data without explicit backup"
  - "Never commit secrets or credentials to version control"
  - "Never bypass quality gates for speed"
  - "Always verify tests pass before marking task complete"
  - "Never claim completion without running actual tests"
  - "Prefer simple solutions over clever ones"
  - "Document decisions, not just code"
  - "When unsure, reject action or flag for review"

Self-Critique Workflow

1. Generate response/code
2. Critique against each principle
3. Revise if any principle violated
4. Only then proceed with action

See

references/lab-research-patterns.md

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/loki-mode

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

• @linear-claude-skill

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @linkedin-automation

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @linkedin-cli

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @linkedin-profile-optimizer

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

references

references/advanced-patterns.md

examples

examples/api-only.md

scripts

scripts/export-to-vibe-kanban.sh

agents

agents/n/a

assets

assets/n/a

• advanced-patterns.md
• agent-types.md
• agents.md
• business-ops.md
• api-only.md
• full-stack-demo.md
• simple-todo-app.md
• static-landing-page.md

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Quick Reference

Critical First Steps (Every Turn)

1. READ

   .loki/CONTINUITY.md

   - Your working memory + "Mistakes & Learnings"
2. RETRIEVE Relevant memories from

   .loki/memory/

   (episodic patterns, anti-patterns)
3. CHECK

   .loki/state/orchestrator.json

   - Current phase/metrics
4. REVIEW

   .loki/queue/pending.json

   - Next tasks
5. FOLLOW RARV cycle: REASON, ACT, REFLECT, VERIFY (test your work!)
6. OPTIMIZE Opus=planning, Sonnet=development, Haiku=unit tests/monitoring - 10+ Haiku agents in parallel
7. TRACK Efficiency metrics: tokens, time, agent count per task
8. CONSOLIDATE After task: Update episodic memory, extract patterns to semantic memory

Key Files (Priority Order)

.loki/CONTINUITY.md

.loki/memory/semantic/

.loki/memory/episodic/

.loki/metrics/efficiency/

.loki/specs/openapi.yaml

CLAUDE.md

.loki/queue/*.json

Decision Tree: What To Do Next?

START
  |
  +-- Read CONTINUITY.md ----------+
  |                                |
  +-- Task in-progress?            |
  |   +-- YES: Resume              |
  |   +-- NO: Check pending queue  |
  |                                |
  +-- Pending tasks?               |
  |   +-- YES: Claim highest priority
  |   +-- NO: Check phase completion
  |                                |
  +-- Phase done?                  |
  |   +-- YES: Advance to next phase
  |   +-- NO: Generate tasks for phase
  |                                |
LOOP <-----------------------------+

SDLC Phase Flow

Bootstrap -> Discovery -> Architecture -> Infrastructure
     |           |            |              |
  (Setup)   (Analyze PRD)  (Design)    (Cloud/DB Setup)
                                             |
Development <- QA <- Deployment <- Business Ops <- Growth Loop
     |         |         |            |            |
 (Build)    (Test)   (Release)    (Monitor)    (Iterate)

Essential Patterns

Spec-First:

OpenAPI -> Tests -> Code -> Validate

Blind Review (parallel) -> Debate (if disagree) -> Devil's Advocate -> Merge

Input Guard (BLOCK) -> Execute -> Output Guard (VALIDATE)

Validation fails -> Halt execution -> Escalate or retry

Try primary -> Model fallback -> Workflow fallback -> Human escalation

Research files -> Create plan (NO CODE) -> Execute plan

Code -> Test -> Fail -> Learn -> Update CONTINUITY.md -> Retry

Generate -> Critique against principles -> Revise

Episodic (trace) -> Pattern Extraction -> Semantic (knowledge)

High-level planner -> Skill selection -> Local executor

Classify Complexity -> Select Agents -> Track Efficiency -> Reward Learning

Proponent defends -> Opponent challenges -> Synthesize

on_handoff -> Pre-fetch context -> Transfer with data

3-5 steps max -> Human review -> Continue

Manual selection -> Focused context -> Fresh per task

LLM output -> Rule-based checks -> Retry or approve

Simple task -> Direct dispatch | Complex task -> Supervisor orchestration

Playwright MCP -> Automate browser -> Verify UI features visually

Imported: References

Detailed documentation is split into reference files for progressive loading:

references/core-workflow.md

references/quality-control.md

references/openai-patterns.md

references/lab-research-patterns.md

references/production-patterns.md

references/advanced-patterns.md

references/tool-orchestration.md

references/memory-system.md

references/agent-types.md

references/task-queue.md

references/sdlc-phases.md

references/spec-driven-dev.md

references/architecture.md

references/mcp-integration.md

references/claude-best-practices.md

references/deployment.md

references/business-ops.md

Version: 2.32.0 | Lines: ~600 | Research-Enhanced: Labs + HN Production Patterns

Imported: RARV Cycle (Every Iteration)

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| REASON: What needs to be done next?                               |
| - READ .loki/CONTINUITY.md first (working memory)                 |
| - READ "Mistakes & Learnings" to avoid past errors                |
| - Check orchestrator.json, review pending.json                    |
| - Identify highest priority unblocked task                        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ACT: Execute the task                                             |
| - Dispatch subagent via Task tool OR execute directly             |
| - Write code, run tests, fix issues                               |
| - Commit changes atomically (git checkpoint)                      |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| REFLECT: Did it work? What next?                                  |
| - Verify task success (tests pass, no errors)                     |
| - UPDATE .loki/CONTINUITY.md with progress                        |
| - Check completion promise - are we done?                         |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| VERIFY: Let AI test its own work (2-3x quality improvement)       |
| - Run automated tests (unit, integration, E2E)                    |
| - Check compilation/build (no errors or warnings)                 |
| - Verify against spec (.loki/specs/openapi.yaml)                  |
|                                                                   |
| IF VERIFICATION FAILS:                                            |
|   1. Capture error details (stack trace, logs)                    |
|   2. Analyze root cause                                           |
|   3. UPDATE CONTINUITY.md "Mistakes & Learnings"                  |
|   4. Rollback to last good git checkpoint (if needed)             |
|   5. Apply learning and RETRY from REASON                         |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

Imported: Model Selection Strategy

CRITICAL: Use the right model for each task type. Opus is ONLY for planning/architecture.

Task Tool Model Parameter

# Opus for planning/architecture ONLY
Task(subagent_type="Plan", model="opus", description="Design system architecture", prompt="...")

# Sonnet for development and functional testing
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Implement API endpoint", prompt="...")
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Write integration tests", prompt="...")

# Haiku for unit tests, monitoring, and simple tasks (PREFER THIS for speed)
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", description="Run unit tests", prompt="...")
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", description="Check service health", prompt="...")

Opus Task Categories (RESTRICTED - Planning Only)

• System architecture design
• High-level planning and strategy
• Security audits and threat modeling
• Major refactoring decisions
• Technology selection

Sonnet Task Categories (Development)

• Feature implementation
• API endpoint development
• Bug fixes (non-trivial)
• Integration tests and E2E tests
• Code refactoring
• Database migrations

Haiku Task Categories (Operations - Use Extensively)

• Writing/running unit tests
• Generating documentation
• Running bash commands (npm install, git operations)
• Simple bug fixes (typos, imports, formatting)
• File operations, linting, static analysis
• Monitoring, health checks, log analysis
• Simple data transformations, boilerplate generation

Parallelization Strategy

# Launch 10+ Haiku agents in parallel for unit test suite
for test_file in test_files:
    Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku",
         description=f"Run unit tests: {test_file}",
         run_in_background=True)

Advanced Task Tool Parameters

Background Agents:

# Launch background agent - returns immediately with output_file path
Task(description="Long analysis task", run_in_background=True, prompt="...")
# Output truncated to 30K chars - use Read tool to check full output file

Agent Resumption (for interrupted/long-running tasks):

# First call returns agent_id
result = Task(description="Complex refactor", prompt="...")
# agent_id from result can resume later
Task(resume="agent-abc123", prompt="Continue from where you left off")

When to use

resume

• Context window limits reached mid-task
• Rate limit recovery
• Multi-session work on same task
• Checkpoint/restore for critical operations

Routing Mode Optimization (AWS Bedrock Pattern)

Two dispatch modes based on task complexity - reduces latency for simple tasks:

Decision Logic:

Task Received
    |
    +-- Is task single-domain? (one file, one skill, clear scope)
    |   +-- YES: Direct Route to specialist agent
    |   |        - Faster (no orchestration overhead)
    |   |        - Minimal context (avoid confusion)
    |   |        - Examples: "Fix typo in README", "Run unit tests"
    |   |
    |   +-- NO: Supervisor Mode
    |            - Full task decomposition
    |            - Coordinate multiple agents
    |            - Synthesize results
    |            - Examples: "Implement auth system", "Refactor API layer"
    |
    +-- Fallback: If intent unclear, use Supervisor Mode

Direct Routing Examples (Skip Orchestration):

# Simple tasks -> Direct dispatch to Haiku
Task(model="haiku", description="Fix import in utils.py", prompt="...")       # Direct
Task(model="haiku", description="Run linter on src/", prompt="...")           # Direct
Task(model="haiku", description="Generate docstring for function", prompt="...")  # Direct

# Complex tasks -> Supervisor orchestration (default Sonnet)
Task(description="Implement user authentication with OAuth", prompt="...")    # Supervisor
Task(description="Refactor database layer for performance", prompt="...")     # Supervisor

Context Depth by Routing Mode:

• Direct Routing: Minimal context - just the task and relevant file(s)
• Supervisor Mode: Full context - CONTINUITY.md, architectural decisions, dependencies

"Keep in mind, complex task histories might confuse simpler subagents." - AWS Best Practices

E2E Testing with Playwright MCP (Anthropic Harness Pattern)

Critical: Features are NOT complete until verified via browser automation.

# Enable Playwright MCP for E2E testing
# In settings or via mcp_servers config:
mcp_servers = {
    "playwright": {"command": "npx", "args": ["@playwright/mcp@latest"]}
}

# Agent can then automate browser to verify features work visually

E2E Verification Flow:

1. Feature implemented and unit tests pass
2. Start dev server via init script
3. Use Playwright MCP to automate browser
4. Verify UI renders correctly
5. Test user interactions (clicks, forms, navigation)
6. Only mark feature complete after visual verification

"Claude mostly did well at verifying features end-to-end once explicitly prompted to use browser automation tools." - Anthropic Engineering

Note: Playwright cannot detect browser-native alert modals. Use custom UI for confirmations.

Imported: Tool Orchestration & Efficiency

Inspired by NVIDIA ToolOrchestra: Track efficiency, learn from rewards, adapt agent selection.

Efficiency Metrics (Track Every Task)

.loki/metrics/efficiency/

.loki/metrics/efficiency/

.loki/metrics/efficiency/

.loki/metrics/efficiency/

Reward Signals (Learn From Outcomes)

OUTCOME REWARD:  +1.0 (success) | 0.0 (partial) | -1.0 (failure)
EFFICIENCY REWARD: 0.0-1.0 based on resources vs baseline
PREFERENCE REWARD: Inferred from user actions (commit/revert/edit)

Dynamic Agent Selection by Complexity

See

references/tool-orchestration.md

Imported: Structured Prompting for Subagents

Single-Responsibility Principle: Each agent should have ONE clear goal and narrow scope. (UiPath Best Practices)

Every subagent dispatch MUST include:

#### Imported: GOAL (What success looks like)

[High-level objective, not just the action]
Example: "Refactor authentication for maintainability and testability"
NOT: "Refactor the auth file"

#### Imported: CONSTRAINTS (What you cannot do)

- No third-party dependencies without approval
- Maintain backwards compatibility with v1.x API
- Keep response time under 200ms

#### Imported: CONTEXT (What you need to know)

- Related files: [list with brief descriptions]
- Previous attempts: [what was tried, why it failed]

#### Imported: OUTPUT FORMAT (What to deliver)

- [ ] Pull request with Why/What/Trade-offs description
- [ ] Unit tests with >90% coverage
- [ ] Update API documentation

#### Imported: Quality Gates

**Never ship code without passing all quality gates:**

1. **Input Guardrails** - Validate scope, detect injection, check constraints (OpenAI SDK pattern)
2. **Static Analysis** - CodeQL, ESLint/Pylint, type checking
3. **Blind Review System** - 3 reviewers in parallel, no visibility of each other's findings
4. **Anti-Sycophancy Check** - If unanimous approval, run Devil's Advocate reviewer
5. **Output Guardrails** - Validate code quality, spec compliance, no secrets (tripwire on fail)
6. **Severity-Based Blocking** - Critical/High/Medium = BLOCK; Low/Cosmetic = TODO comment
7. **Test Coverage Gates** - Unit: 100% pass, >80% coverage; Integration: 100% pass

**Guardrails Execution Modes:**
- **Blocking**: Guardrail completes before agent starts (use for expensive operations)
- **Parallel**: Guardrail runs with agent (use for fast checks, accept token loss risk)

**Research insight:** Blind review + Devil's Advocate reduces false positives by 30% (CONSENSAGENT, 2025).
**OpenAI insight:** "Layered defense - multiple specialized guardrails create resilient agents."

See `references/quality-control.md` and `references/openai-patterns.md` for details.

---

#### Imported: Agent Types Overview

Loki Mode has 37 specialized agent types across 7 swarms. The orchestrator spawns only agents needed for your project.

| Swarm | Agent Count | Examples |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Engineering | 8 | frontend, backend, database, mobile, api, qa, perf, infra |
| Operations | 8 | devops, sre, security, monitor, incident, release, cost, compliance |
| Business | 8 | marketing, sales, finance, legal, support, hr, investor, partnerships |
| Data | 3 | ml, data-eng, analytics |
| Product | 3 | pm, design, techwriter |
| Growth | 4 | growth-hacker, community, success, lifecycle |
| Review | 3 | code, business, security |

See `references/agent-types.md` for complete definitions and capabilities.

---

#### Imported: Common Issues & Solutions

| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|----------|
| Agent stuck/no progress | Lost context | Read `.loki/CONTINUITY.md` first thing every turn |
| Task repeating | Not checking queue state | Check `.loki/queue/*.json` before claiming |
| Code review failing | Skipped static analysis | Run static analysis BEFORE AI reviewers |
| Breaking API changes | Code before spec | Follow Spec-First workflow |
| Rate limit hit | Too many parallel agents | Check circuit breakers, use exponential backoff |
| Tests failing after merge | Skipped quality gates | Never bypass Severity-Based Blocking |
| Can't find what to do | Not following decision tree | Use Decision Tree, check orchestrator.json |
| Memory/context growing | Not using ledgers | Write to ledgers after completing tasks |

---

#### Imported: Red Flags - Never Do These

### Implementation Anti-Patterns
- **NEVER** skip code review between tasks
- **NEVER** proceed with unfixed Critical/High/Medium issues
- **NEVER** dispatch reviewers sequentially (always parallel - 3x faster)
- **NEVER** dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
- **NEVER** implement without reading task requirements first

### Review Anti-Patterns
- **NEVER** use sonnet for reviews (always opus for deep analysis)
- **NEVER** aggregate before all 3 reviewers complete
- **NEVER** skip re-review after fixes

### System Anti-Patterns
- **NEVER** delete .loki/state/ directory while running
- **NEVER** manually edit queue files without file locking
- **NEVER** skip checkpoints before major operations
- **NEVER** ignore circuit breaker states

### Always Do These
- **ALWAYS** launch all 3 reviewers in single message (3 Task calls)
- **ALWAYS** specify model: "opus" for each reviewer
- **ALWAYS** wait for all reviewers before aggregating
- **ALWAYS** fix Critical/High/Medium immediately
- **ALWAYS** re-run ALL 3 reviewers after fixes
- **ALWAYS** checkpoint state before spawning subagents

---

#### Imported: Multi-Tiered Fallback System

**Based on OpenAI Agent Safety Patterns:**

### Model-Level Fallbacks

opus -> sonnet -> haiku (if rate limited or unavailable)

### Workflow-Level Fallbacks

Full workflow fails -> Simplified workflow -> Decompose to subtasks -> Human escalation

### Human Escalation Triggers

| Trigger | Action |
|---------|--------|
| retry_count > 3 | Pause and escalate |
| domain in [payments, auth, pii] | Require approval |
| confidence_score < 0.6 | Pause and escalate |
| wall_time > expected * 3 | Pause and escalate |
| tokens_used > budget * 0.8 | Pause and escalate |

See `references/openai-patterns.md` for full fallback implementation.

---

#### Imported: AGENTS.md Integration

**Read target project's AGENTS.md if exists** (OpenAI/AAIF standard):

Context Priority:

1. AGENTS.md (closest to current file)
2. CLAUDE.md (Claude-specific)
3. .loki/CONTINUITY.md (session state)
4. Package docs
5. README.md

---

#### Imported: Debate-Based Verification (DeepMind)

**For critical changes, use structured debate between AI critics.**

Proponent (defender) --> Presents proposal with evidence | v Opponent (challenger) --> Finds flaws, challenges claims | v Synthesizer --> Weighs arguments, produces verdict | v If disagreement persists --> Escalate to human

**Use for:** Architecture decisions, security-sensitive changes, major refactors.

See `references/lab-research-patterns.md` for debate verification details.

---

#### Imported: Production Patterns (HN 2025)

**Battle-tested insights from practitioners building real systems.**

### Narrow Scope Wins

```yaml
task_constraints:
  max_steps_before_review: 3-5
  characteristics:
    - Specific, well-defined objectives
    - Pre-classified inputs
    - Deterministic success criteria
    - Verifiable outputs

Confidence-Based Routing

confidence >= 0.95  -->  Auto-approve with audit log
confidence >= 0.70  -->  Quick human review
confidence >= 0.40  -->  Detailed human review
confidence < 0.40   -->  Escalate immediately

Deterministic Outer Loops

Wrap agent outputs with rule-based validation (NOT LLM-judged):

1. Agent generates output
2. Run linter (deterministic)
3. Run tests (deterministic)
4. Check compilation (deterministic)
5. Only then: human or AI review

Context Engineering

principles:
  - "Less is more" - focused beats comprehensive
  - Manual selection outperforms automatic RAG
  - Fresh conversations per major task
  - Remove outdated information aggressively

context_budget:
  target: "< 10k tokens for context"
  reserve: "90% for model reasoning"

Sub-Agents for Context Isolation

Use sub-agents to prevent token waste on noisy subtasks:

Main agent (focused) --> Sub-agent (file search)
                     --> Sub-agent (test running)
                     --> Sub-agent (linting)

See

references/production-patterns.md

Imported: Exit Conditions

Imported: Directory Structure Overview

.loki/
+-- CONTINUITY.md           # Working memory (read/update every turn)
+-- specs/
|   +-- openapi.yaml        # API spec - source of truth
+-- queue/
|   +-- pending.json        # Tasks waiting to be claimed
|   +-- in-progress.json    # Currently executing tasks
|   +-- completed.json      # Finished tasks
|   +-- dead-letter.json    # Failed tasks for review
+-- state/
|   +-- orchestrator.json   # Master state (phase, metrics)
|   +-- agents/             # Per-agent state files
|   +-- circuit-breakers/   # Rate limiting state
+-- memory/
|   +-- episodic/           # Specific interaction traces (what happened)
|   +-- semantic/           # Generalized patterns (how things work)
|   +-- skills/             # Learned action sequences (how to do X)
|   +-- ledgers/            # Agent-specific checkpoints
|   +-- handoffs/           # Agent-to-agent transfers
+-- metrics/
|   +-- efficiency/         # Task efficiency scores (time, agents, retries)
|   +-- rewards/            # Outcome/efficiency/preference rewards
|   +-- dashboard.json      # Rolling metrics summary
+-- artifacts/
    +-- reports/            # Generated reports/dashboards

See

references/architecture.md