Awesome-omni-skills rag-implementation
RAG Implementation Workflow workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) implementation workflow covering embedding selection, vector database setup, chunking strategies, and retrieval optimization and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/rag-implementation" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-rag-implementation && rm -rf "$T"
skills/rag-implementation/SKILL.mdRAG Implementation Workflow
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/rag-implementation from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
RAG Implementation Workflow
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: RAG Architecture, Quality Gates, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- Building RAG-powered applications
- Implementing semantic search
- Creating knowledge-grounded AI
- Setting up document Q&A systems
- Optimizing retrieval quality
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) implementation workflow covering embedding selection, vector database setup, chunking strategies, and retrieval optimization.
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- ai-product - AI product design
- rag-engineer - RAG engineering
- Define use case
- Identify data sources
- Set accuracy requirements
- Determine latency targets
- Plan evaluation metrics
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Workflow Phases
Phase 1: Requirements Analysis
Skills to Invoke
- AI product designai-product
- RAG engineeringrag-engineer
Actions
- Define use case
- Identify data sources
- Set accuracy requirements
- Determine latency targets
- Plan evaluation metrics
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @ai-product to define RAG application requirements
Phase 2: Embedding Selection
Skills to Invoke
- Embedding selectionembedding-strategies
- RAG patternsrag-engineer
Actions
- Evaluate embedding models
- Test domain relevance
- Measure embedding quality
- Consider cost/latency
- Select model
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @embedding-strategies to select optimal embedding model
Phase 3: Vector Database Setup
Skills to Invoke
- Vector DBvector-database-engineer
- Similarity searchsimilarity-search-patterns
Actions
- Choose vector database
- Design schema
- Configure indexes
- Set up connection
- Test queries
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @vector-database-engineer to set up vector database
Phase 4: Chunking Strategy
Skills to Invoke
- Chunking strategiesrag-engineer
- RAG implementationrag-implementation
Actions
- Choose chunk size
- Implement chunking
- Add overlap handling
- Create metadata
- Test retrieval quality
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @rag-engineer to implement chunking strategy
Phase 5: Retrieval Implementation
Skills to Invoke
- Similarity searchsimilarity-search-patterns
- Hybrid searchhybrid-search-implementation
Actions
- Implement vector search
- Add keyword search
- Configure hybrid search
- Set up reranking
- Optimize latency
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @similarity-search-patterns to implement retrieval
Use @hybrid-search-implementation to add hybrid search
Phase 6: LLM Integration
Skills to Invoke
- LLM integrationllm-application-dev-ai-assistant
- Prompt optimizationllm-application-dev-prompt-optimize
Actions
- Select LLM provider
- Design prompt template
- Implement context injection
- Add citation handling
- Test generation quality
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @llm-application-dev-ai-assistant to integrate LLM
Phase 7: Caching
Skills to Invoke
- Prompt cachingprompt-caching
- RAG optimizationrag-engineer
Actions
- Implement response caching
- Set up embedding cache
- Configure TTL
- Add cache invalidation
- Monitor hit rates
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @prompt-caching to implement RAG caching
Phase 8: Evaluation
Skills to Invoke
- LLM evaluationllm-evaluation
- AI evaluationevaluation
Actions
- Define evaluation metrics
- Create test dataset
- Measure retrieval accuracy
- Evaluate generation quality
- Iterate on improvements
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @llm-evaluation to evaluate RAG system
Imported: Related Workflow Bundles
- AI/ML developmentai-ml
- AI agentsai-agent-development
- Vector databasesdatabase
Imported: Overview
Specialized workflow for implementing RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems including embedding model selection, vector database setup, chunking strategies, retrieval optimization, and evaluation.
Imported: RAG Architecture
User Query -> Embedding -> Vector Search -> Retrieved Docs -> LLM -> Response | | | | Model Vector DB Chunk Store Prompt + Context
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @rag-implementation to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @rag-implementation against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @rag-implementation for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @rag-implementation using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
- Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
- Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
- Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/rag-implementation, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@prompt-engineer
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@prompt-engineering
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@prompt-engineering-patterns
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@prompt-library
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Quality Gates
- Embedding model selected
- Vector DB configured
- Chunking implemented
- Retrieval working
- LLM integrated
- Evaluation passing
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.