Awesome-omni-skills robius-app-architecture
Robius App Architecture Skill workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs | and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/robius-app-architecture" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-robius-app-architecture && rm -rf "$T"
skills/robius-app-architecture/SKILL.mdRobius App Architecture Skill
Overview
This public intake copy packages
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/robius-app-architecture from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses
metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Robius App Architecture Skill Best practices for structuring Makepad applications based on the Robrix and Moly codebases - production applications built with Makepad and Robius framework. Source codebases: - Robrix: Matrix chat client - complex sync/async with background subscriptions - Moly: AI chat application - cross-platform (native + WASM) with streaming APIs
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Production Patterns, Core Architecture Pattern, App Structure, Tokio Runtime Integration, Lock-Free Update Queue Pattern, Startup Sequence.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- Building a Makepad application with async backend integration
- Designing sync/async communication patterns in Makepad
- Structuring a Robius-style application
- Keywords: robrix, robius, makepad app structure, async makepad, tokio makepad
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: |.
- Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | | Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | | Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | | Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | | Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | | Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
- Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
- Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
- Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
- Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
- Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
- Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Production Patterns
For production-ready async patterns, see the
_base/ directory:
| Pattern | Description |
|---|---|
| 08-async-loading | Async data loading with loading states |
| 09-streaming-results | Incremental results with SignalToUI |
| 13-tokio-integration | Full tokio runtime integration |
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @robius-app-architecture to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @robius-app-architecture against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @robius-app-architecture for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @robius-app-architecture using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Separation of Concerns: Keep UI logic on the main thread, async operations in Tokio runtime
- Request/Response Pattern: Use typed enums for requests and actions
- Lock-Free Updates: Use crossbeam::SegQueue for high-frequency background updates
- SignalToUI: Always call SignalToUI::setuisignal() after enqueueing updates
- Cx::post_action(): Use for async task results that need action handling
- Scope::with_data(): Pass shared state through widget tree
- Module Registration Order: Register base widgets before dependent modules in live_register()
Imported Operating Notes
Imported: Best Practices
- Separation of Concerns: Keep UI logic on the main thread, async operations in Tokio runtime
- Request/Response Pattern: Use typed enums for requests and actions
- Lock-Free Updates: Use
for high-frequency background updatescrossbeam::SegQueue - SignalToUI: Always call
after enqueueing updatesSignalToUI::set_ui_signal() - Cx::post_action(): Use for async task results that need action handling
- Scope::with_data(): Pass shared state through widget tree
- Module Registration Order: Register base widgets before dependent modules in
live_register()
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in
plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/robius-app-architecture, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated
SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@00-andruia-consultant-v2
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@10-andruia-skill-smith-v2
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@20-andruia-niche-intelligence-v2
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@2d-games
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
| copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | |
| worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | |
| upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | |
| routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | |
| supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Reference Files
- Detailed Tokio runtime patterns (Robrix)references/tokio-integration.md
- Channel communication patterns (Robrix)references/channel-patterns.md
- Cross-platform async patterns (Moly)references/moly-async-patterns.md
trait for native/WASM compatibilityPlatformSend
for async defer operationsUiRunner
for task cancellationAbortOnDropHandle
for non-Send types on WASMThreadToken
platform-agnostic functionspawn()
Imported: Core Architecture Pattern
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ UI Thread (Makepad) │ │ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ │ │ App │────▶│ WidgetRef │────▶│ Widget Tree (View) │ │ │ │ State │ │ ui │ │ Scope::with_data() │ │ │ └────┬────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ submit_async_request() │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ REQUEST_SENDER │─────────▶│ Crossbeam SegQueue │ │ │ │ (MPSC Channel) │ │ (Lock-free Updates) │ │ │ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────┘ │ └───────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘ │ SignalToUI::set_ui_signal() │ ┌───────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────┐ │ Tokio Runtime (Async) │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ worker_task (Request Handler) │ │ │ │ - Receives Request from UI │ │ │ │ - Spawns async tasks per request │ │ │ │ - Posts actions back via Cx::post_action() │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Per-Item Subscriber Tasks │ │ │ │ - Listens to external data stream │ │ │ │ - Sends Update via crossbeam channel │ │ │ │ - Calls SignalToUI::set_ui_signal() to wake UI │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Imported: App Structure
Top-Level App Definition
use makepad_widgets::*; live_design! { use link::theme::*; use link::widgets::*; App = {{App}} { ui: <Root>{ main_window = <Window> { window: {inner_size: vec2(1280, 800), title: "MyApp"}, body = { // Main content here } } } } } app_main!(App); #[derive(Live)] pub struct App { #[live] ui: WidgetRef, #[rust] app_state: AppState, } impl LiveRegister for App { fn live_register(cx: &mut Cx) { // Order matters: register base widgets first makepad_widgets::live_design(cx); // Then shared/common widgets crate::shared::live_design(cx); // Then feature modules crate::home::live_design(cx); } } impl LiveHook for App { fn after_new_from_doc(&mut self, cx: &mut Cx) { // One-time initialization after widget tree is created } }
AppMain Implementation
impl AppMain for App { fn handle_event(&mut self, cx: &mut Cx, event: &Event) { // Forward to MatchEvent trait self.match_event(cx, event); // Pass AppState through widget tree via Scope let scope = &mut Scope::with_data(&mut self.app_state); self.ui.handle_event(cx, event, scope); } }
Imported: Tokio Runtime Integration
Static Runtime Initialization
use std::sync::Mutex; use tokio::sync::mpsc::{UnboundedReceiver, UnboundedSender}; static TOKIO_RUNTIME: Mutex<Option<tokio::runtime::Runtime>> = Mutex::new(None); static REQUEST_SENDER: Mutex<Option<UnboundedSender<AppRequest>>> = Mutex::new(None); pub fn start_async_runtime() -> Result<tokio::runtime::Handle> { let (request_sender, request_receiver) = tokio::sync::mpsc::unbounded_channel(); let rt_handle = TOKIO_RUNTIME.lock().unwrap() .get_or_insert_with(|| { tokio::runtime::Runtime::new() .expect("Failed to create Tokio runtime") }) .handle() .clone(); // Store sender for UI thread to use *REQUEST_SENDER.lock().unwrap() = Some(request_sender); // Spawn the main worker task rt_handle.spawn(worker_task(request_receiver)); Ok(rt_handle) }
Request Submission Pattern
pub enum AppRequest { FetchData { id: String }, SendMessage { content: String }, // ... other request types } /// Submit a request from UI thread to async runtime pub fn submit_async_request(req: AppRequest) { if let Some(sender) = REQUEST_SENDER.lock().unwrap().as_ref() { sender.send(req) .expect("BUG: worker task receiver has died!"); } }
Worker Task Pattern
async fn worker_task(mut request_receiver: UnboundedReceiver<AppRequest>) -> Result<()> { while let Some(request) = request_receiver.recv().await { match request { AppRequest::FetchData { id } => { // Spawn a new task for each request let _task = tokio::spawn(async move { let result = fetch_data(&id).await; // Post result back to UI thread Cx::post_action(DataFetchedAction { id, result }); }); } AppRequest::SendMessage { content } => { let _task = tokio::spawn(async move { match send_message(&content).await { Ok(()) => Cx::post_action(MessageSentAction::Success), Err(e) => Cx::post_action(MessageSentAction::Failed(e)), } }); } } } Ok(()) }
Imported: Lock-Free Update Queue Pattern
For high-frequency updates from background tasks:
use crossbeam_queue::SegQueue; use makepad_widgets::SignalToUI; pub enum DataUpdate { NewItem { item: Item }, ItemChanged { id: String, changes: Changes }, Status { message: String }, } static PENDING_UPDATES: SegQueue<DataUpdate> = SegQueue::new(); /// Called from background async tasks pub fn enqueue_update(update: DataUpdate) { PENDING_UPDATES.push(update); SignalToUI::set_ui_signal(); // Wake UI thread } // In widget's handle_event: impl Widget for MyWidget { fn handle_event(&mut self, cx: &mut Cx, event: &Event, scope: &mut Scope) { // Poll for updates on Signal events if let Event::Signal = event { while let Some(update) = PENDING_UPDATES.pop() { match update { DataUpdate::NewItem { item } => { self.items.push(item); self.redraw(cx); } // ... handle other updates } } } } }
Imported: Startup Sequence
impl MatchEvent for App { fn handle_startup(&mut self, cx: &mut Cx) { // 1. Initialize logging let _ = tracing_subscriber::fmt::try_init(); // 2. Initialize app data directory let _app_data_dir = crate::app_data_dir(); // 3. Load persisted state if let Err(e) = persistence::load_window_state( self.ui.window(ids!(main_window)), cx ) { error!("Failed to load window state: {}", e); } // 4. Update UI based on loaded state self.update_ui_visibility(cx); // 5. Start async runtime let _rt_handle = crate::start_async_runtime().unwrap(); } }
Imported: Shutdown Sequence
impl AppMain for App { fn handle_event(&mut self, cx: &mut Cx, event: &Event) { if let Event::Shutdown = event { // Save window geometry let window_ref = self.ui.window(ids!(main_window)); if let Err(e) = persistence::save_window_state(window_ref, cx) { error!("Failed to save window state: {e}"); } // Save app state if let Some(user_id) = current_user_id() { if let Err(e) = persistence::save_app_state( self.app_state.clone(), user_id ) { error!("Failed to save app state: {e}"); } } } // ... rest of event handling } }
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.