Awesome-omni-skills seo-aeo-landing-page-writer

SEO-AEO Landing Page Writer workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Writes complete, structured landing pages optimized for SEO ranking, AEO citation, and visitor conversion. Activate when the user wants to write or generate a landing page for a product, service, or offer and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/seo-aeo-landing-page-writer" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-seo-aeo-landing-page-writer && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/seo-aeo-landing-page-writer/SKILL.md
source content

SEO-AEO Landing Page Writer

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/seo-aeo-landing-page-writer
from
https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json
plus
ORIGIN.md
as the provenance anchor for review.

SEO-AEO Landing Page Writer

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: How It Works, Common Pitfalls, Limitations.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

  • Use when building a landing page for a new product or service
  • Use when an existing landing page needs a full SEO and AEO rewrite
  • Use when you need a page that can be cited by AI engines like Perplexity or ChatGPT
  • Use when you want conversion copy that leads with pain before pitching the product
  • Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Writes complete, structured landing pages optimized for SEO ranking, AEO citation, and visitor conversion. Activate when the user wants to write or generate a landing page for a product, service, or offer.
  • Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.

Operating Table

SituationStart hereWhy it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
SKILL.md
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
SKILL.md
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

  1. Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
  2. Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
  3. Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
  4. Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
  5. Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
  6. Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
  7. Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: Overview

Generates a full, publish-ready landing page following a defined section order with SEO heading structure, AEO extraction blocks, FAQ section, comparison table, social proof, and conversion-focused CTAs. Every section serves a specific purpose in a narrative arc that moves the visitor from awareness to action.

Part of the SEO-AEO Engine.

Imported: How It Works

Step 1: Map Inputs

Extract product name, audience, primary keyword, pain points, features, benefits, USPs, social proof, and CTAs. Map every feature to a user outcome before writing any copy.

Step 2: Write AEO Extraction Sentence

Write one 25–40 word sentence that answers "What is [product]?" — standalone, no jargon, placed in a blockquote immediately after the H1. This is the sentence AI engines extract.

Step 3: Follow the Narrative Arc

Write sections in this exact order:

  1. Hero — H1 + AEO sentence + CTA
  2. Problem — audience pain, no product mention yet
  3. Solution — introduce product as the answer
  4. Features as Benefits — table format
  5. Social Proof — testimonials, logos, stats
  6. Mid-page CTA
  7. How It Works — numbered steps
  8. Comparison — table with honest competitor comparison
  9. FAQ — minimum 6 entries, each under 50 words
  10. Trust Signals
  11. Final CTA

Step 4: Run SEO and AEO Checklists

Verify keyword placement, heading hierarchy, FAQ count, AEO block presence, and meta description placeholder before outputting.

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @seo-aeo-landing-page-writer to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @seo-aeo-landing-page-writer against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @seo-aeo-landing-page-writer for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @seo-aeo-landing-page-writer using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Imported Usage Notes

Imported: Examples

Example 1: Hero Section Output

Ship Faster With Your Remote Team

Syncro is a remote-first project management platform that helps distributed engineering teams track work, communicate asynchronously, and ship without the chaos of email and scattered spreadsheets.

[Start Free Trial] [See How It Works] "4,000+ remote teams" · "40% fewer status meetings" · "4.8/5 on G2"

Example 2: FAQ Section Output

Q: What is Syncro? A: Syncro is a remote-first project management platform for distributed engineering teams. It centralises task tracking, async communication, and sprint planning in one tool. Q: How much does Syncro cost? A: Syncro offers a flat-rate plan at $49/month for unlimited users. A 14-day free trial is available — no credit card required.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

  • ✅ Do: Write the problem section before mentioning the product — empathy first
  • ✅ Do: Place the AEO extraction sentence in a blockquote immediately after H1
  • ✅ Do: Write FAQ answers as standalone — each must make sense without context
  • ✅ Do: Include at least one honest point in the comparison table where the alternative wins
  • ❌ Don't: Use "revolutionary", "game-changing", or "best-in-class" anywhere
  • ❌ Don't: Use "Submit" or "Click Here" as CTA button text
  • ❌ Don't: Write paragraphs longer than 4 lines

Imported Operating Notes

Imported: Best Practices

  • Do: Write the problem section before mentioning the product — empathy first
  • Do: Place the AEO extraction sentence in a blockquote immediately after H1
  • Do: Write FAQ answers as standalone — each must make sense without context
  • Do: Include at least one honest point in the comparison table where the alternative wins
  • Don't: Use "revolutionary", "game-changing", or "best-in-class" anywhere
  • Don't: Use "Submit" or "Click Here" as CTA button text
  • Don't: Write paragraphs longer than 4 lines

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/seo-aeo-landing-page-writer
, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open
metadata.json
,
ORIGIN.md
, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md
, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

  • @00-andruia-consultant-v2
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @10-andruia-skill-smith-v2
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @20-andruia-niche-intelligence-v2
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
  • @2d-games
    - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Resource familyWhat it gives the reviewerExample path
references
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream
references/n/a
examples
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream
examples/n/a
scripts
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation
scripts/n/a
agents
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package
agents/n/a
assets
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package
assets/n/a

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: Additional Resources

Imported: Common Pitfalls

  • Problem: Product mentioned in the pain section Solution: The pain section exists to build empathy. Save the product introduction for the solution section.

  • Problem: FAQ answers are too long to be extracted by AI engines Solution: Every FAQ answer must be under 50 words and self-contained.

Imported: Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.