Awesome-omni-skills tdd-workflow

TDD Workflow workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Test-Driven Development workflow principles. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

install

source · Clone the upstream repo

git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills

Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/

T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/tdd-workflow" ~/.claude/skills/diegosouzapw-awesome-omni-skills-tdd-workflow && rm -rf "$T"

manifest: skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md

TDD Workflow

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/tdd-workflow

from

https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json

plus

ORIGIN.md

as the provenance anchor for review.

TDD Workflow > Write tests first, code second. ---

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: 1. The TDD Cycle, 2. The Three Laws of TDD, 6. AAA Pattern, 8. Test Prioritization, 9. Anti-Patterns, 10. AI-Augmented TDD.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

Scenario - TDD Value
New feature - High
Bug fix - High (write test first)
Complex logic - High
Exploratory - Low (spike, then TDD)
UI layout - Low

Operating Table

Situation	Start here	Why it matters
First-time use	`metadata.json`	Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review	`ORIGIN.md`	Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution	`SKILL.md`	Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context	`SKILL.md`	Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision	`## Related Skills`	Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: 1. The TDD Cycle

🔴 RED → Write failing test
    ↓
🟢 GREEN → Write minimal code to pass
    ↓
🔵 REFACTOR → Improve code quality
    ↓
   Repeat...

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @tdd-workflow to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @tdd-workflow against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @tdd-workflow for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @tdd-workflow using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

Focus - Example
Behavior - "should add two numbers"
Edge cases - "should handle empty input"
Error states - "should throw for invalid data"
Test must fail first
Test name describes expected behavior
One assertion per test (ideally)

Imported Operating Notes

Imported: 3. RED Phase Principles

What to Write

Focus	Example
Behavior	"should add two numbers"
Edge cases	"should handle empty input"
Error states	"should throw for invalid data"

RED Phase Rules

Test must fail first
Test name describes expected behavior
One assertion per test (ideally)

Imported: 4. GREEN Phase Principles

Minimum Code

Principle	Meaning
YAGNI	You Aren't Gonna Need It
Simplest thing	Write the minimum to pass
No optimization	Just make it work

GREEN Phase Rules

Don't write unneeded code
Don't optimize yet
Pass the test, nothing more

Imported: 5. REFACTOR Phase Principles

What to Improve

Area	Action
Duplication	Extract common code
Naming	Make intent clear
Structure	Improve organization
Complexity	Simplify logic

REFACTOR Rules

All tests must stay green
Small incremental changes
Commit after each refactor

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/tdd-workflow

, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md

, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Related Skills

```
@supply-chain-risk-auditor
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
```
@sveltekit
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
```
@swift-concurrency-expert
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
```
@swiftui-expert-skill
```
- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

Resource family	What it gives the reviewer	Example path
`references`	copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream	`references/n/a`
`examples`	worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream	`examples/n/a`
`scripts`	upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation	`scripts/n/a`
`agents`	routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package	`agents/n/a`
`assets`	supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package	`assets/n/a`

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: 2. The Three Laws of TDD

Write production code only to make a failing test pass
Write only enough test to demonstrate failure
Write only enough code to make the test pass

Imported: 6. AAA Pattern

Every test follows:

Step	Purpose
Arrange	Set up test data
Act	Execute code under test
Assert	Verify expected outcome

Imported: 8. Test Prioritization

Priority	Test Type
1	Happy path
2	Error cases
3	Edge cases
4	Performance

Imported: 9. Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't	✅ Do
Skip the RED phase	Watch test fail first
Write tests after	Write tests before
Over-engineer initial	Keep it simple
Multiple asserts	One behavior per test
Test implementation	Test behavior

Imported: 10. AI-Augmented TDD

Multi-Agent Pattern

Agent	Role
Agent A	Write failing tests (RED)
Agent B	Implement to pass (GREEN)
Agent C	Optimize (REFACTOR)

Remember: The test is the specification. If you can't write a test, you don't understand the requirement.

Imported: Limitations

Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.