Writing Skills (Excellence)

Overview

This public intake copy packages

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/writing-skills

https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.

This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

Writing Skills (Excellence) Dispatcher for skill creation excellence. Use the decision tree below to find the right template and standards.

Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: ⚡ Quick Decision Tree, 🛠️ Templates, How It Works, ✅ Pre-Deploy Checklist, Limitations.

When to Use This Skill

Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.

• Creating a NEW skill from scratch
• Improving an EXISTING skill that agents ignore
• Debugging why a skill isn't being triggered
• Standardizing skills across a team
• [Symptom A]
• [Error message]

Operating Table

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

references/anti-rationalization/README.md

references/cso/README.md

## Related Skills

Workflow

This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.

1. Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
2. Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
3. Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
4. Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
5. Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
6. Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
7. Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.

Imported Workflow Notes

Imported: ⚡ Quick Decision Tree

What do you need to do?

1. Create a NEW skill:

   • Is it simple (single file, <200 lines)? → Tier 1 Architecture
   • Is it complex (multi-concept, 200-1000 lines)? → Tier 2 Architecture
   • Is it a massive platform (10+ products, AWS, Convex)? → Tier 3 Architecture

2. Improve an EXISTING skill:

   • Fix "it's too long" -> Modularize (Tier 3)
   • Fix "AI ignores rules" -> Anti-Rationalization
   • Fix "users can't find it" -> CSO (Search Optimization)

3. Verify Compliance:

   • Check metadata/naming -> Standards
   • Add tests -> Testing Guide

Examples

Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly

Use @writing-skills to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.

Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.

Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review

Review @writing-skills against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.

Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.

Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution

Use @writing-skills for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.

Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.

Example 4: Build a reviewer packet

Review @writing-skills using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.

Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.

Imported Usage Notes

Imported: Quick Example

---
name: my-technique
description: Use when [specific symptom occurs].
metadata:
  category: technique
  triggers: error-text, symptom, tool-name
---

# My Technique

#### Imported: Examples

**Create a Tier 1 skill:**
```bash
mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-technique
touch ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-technique/SKILL.md

Create a Tier 2 skill:

mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/references/core
touch ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/{SKILL.md,gotchas.md}
touch ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/references/core/README.md

Best Practices

Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.

• Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
• Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
• Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
• Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
• Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
• Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.

Troubleshooting

Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically

Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in

plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/writing-skills

metadata.json

ORIGIN.md

Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review

Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated

SKILL.md

Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization

Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.

Imported Troubleshooting Notes

Imported: Common Mistakes

metadata.triggers

creating-skills

references/

See gotchas.md for more.

Related Skills

• @00-andruia-consultant-v2

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @10-andruia-skill-smith-v2

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @20-andruia-niche-intelligence-v2

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

• @3d-web-experience-v2

  - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.

Additional Resources

Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.

references

references/anti-rationalization/README.md

examples

examples/n/a

scripts

scripts/n/a

agents

agents/n/a

assets

assets/n/a

• anti-rationalization/README.md
• cso/README.md
• standards/README.md
• standards/metadata-standard.md
• anthropic-best-practices.md
• examples.md

Imported Reference Notes

Imported: 📚 Component Index

Imported: 🛠️ Templates

• Technique Skill (How-to)
• Reference Skill (Docs)
• Discipline Skill (Rules)
• Pattern Skill (Design Patterns)

Imported: How It Works

1. Identify goal → Use decision tree above
2. Select template → From

   references/templates/

3. Apply CSO → Optimize description for discovery
4. Add anti-rationalization → For discipline skills
5. Test → RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle

Imported: ✅ Pre-Deploy Checklist

Before deploying any skill:

• name

  field matches directory name exactly

• SKILL.md

  filename is ALL CAPS
• Description starts with "Use when..."

• metadata.triggers

  has 3+ keywords
• Total lines < 500 (use

  references/

  for more)
• No

  @

  force-loading in cross-references
• Tested with real scenarios

Imported: Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.