Skills build-perf-diagnostics

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: dotnet msbuild binlog replay with performancesummary, grep for analysis.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/dotnet/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/plugins/dotnet-msbuild/skills/build-perf-diagnostics" ~/.claude/skills/dotnet-skills-build-perf-diagnostics && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: plugins/dotnet-msbuild/skills/build-perf-diagnostics/SKILL.md
source content

Performance Analysis Methodology

  1. Generate a binlog:
    dotnet build /bl:{} -m
  2. Replay to diagnostic log with performance summary:
    dotnet msbuild build.binlog -noconlog -fl -flp:v=diag;logfile=full.log;performancesummary
    
  3. Read the performance summary (at the end of
    full.log
    ):
    grep "Target Performance Summary\|Task Performance Summary" -A 50 full.log
    
  4. Find expensive targets and tasks: The PerformanceSummary section lists all targets/tasks sorted by cumulative time
  5. Check for node utilization: grep for scheduling and node messages
    grep -i "node.*assigned\|building with\|scheduler" full.log | head -30
    
  6. Check analyzers: grep for analyzer timing
    grep -i "analyzer.*elapsed\|Total analyzer execution time\|CompilerAnalyzerDriver" full.log
    

Key Metrics and Thresholds

  • Build duration: what's "normal" — small project <10s, medium <60s, large <5min
  • Node utilization: ideal is >80% active time across nodes. Low utilization = serialization bottleneck
  • Single target domination: if one target is >50% of build time, investigate
  • Analyzer time vs compile time: analyzers should be <30% of Csc task time. If higher, consider removing expensive analyzers
  • RAR time: ResolveAssemblyReference >5s is concerning. >15s is pathological

Common Bottlenecks

1. ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) Slowness

  • Symptoms: RAR taking >5s per project
  • Root causes: too many assembly references, network-based reference paths, large assembly search paths
  • Fixes: reduce reference count, use
    <DesignTimeBuild>false</DesignTimeBuild>
    for RAR-heavy analysis, set
    <ResolveAssemblyReferencesSilent>true</ResolveAssemblyReferencesSilent>
    for diagnostic
  • Advanced:
    <DesignTimeBuild>
    and
    <ResolveAssemblyWarnOrErrorOnTargetArchitectureMismatch>
  • Key insight: RAR runs unconditionally even on incremental builds because users may have installed targeting packs or GACed assemblies (see dotnet/msbuild#2015). With .NET Core micro-assemblies, the reference count is often very high.
  • Reduce transitive references: Set
    <DisableTransitiveProjectReferences>true</DisableTransitiveProjectReferences>
    to avoid pulling in the full transitive closure (note: projects may need to add direct references for any types they consume). Use
    ReferenceOutputAssembly="false"
    on ProjectReferences that are only needed at build time (not API surface). Trim unused PackageReferences.

2. Roslyn Analyzers and Source Generators

  • Symptoms: Csc task takes much longer than expected for file count (>2× clean compile time)
  • Diagnosis: Check the Task Performance Summary in the replayed log for Csc task time; grep for analyzer timing messages; compare Csc duration with and without analyzers (
    /p:RunAnalyzers=false
    )
  • Fixes:
    • Conditionally disable in dev:
      <RunAnalyzers Condition="'$(ContinuousIntegrationBuild)' != 'true'">false</RunAnalyzers>
    • Per-configuration:
      <RunAnalyzers Condition="'$(Configuration)' == 'Debug'">false</RunAnalyzers>
    • Code-style only:
      <EnforceCodeStyleInBuild Condition="'$(ContinuousIntegrationBuild)' == 'true'">true</EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>
    • Remove genuinely redundant analyzers from inner loop
    • Severity config in .editorconfig for less critical rules
  • Key principle: Preserve analyzer enforcement in CI. Never just "remove" analyzers — configure them conditionally.
  • GlobalPackageReference: Analyzers added via
    GlobalPackageReference
    in
    Directory.Packages.props
    apply to ALL projects. Consider if test projects need the same analyzer set as production code.
  • EnforceCodeStyleInBuild: When set to
    true
    in
    Directory.Build.props
    , forces code-style analysis on every build. Should be conditional on CI environment (
    ContinuousIntegrationBuild
    ) to avoid slowing dev inner loop.

3. Serialization Bottlenecks (Single-threaded targets)

  • Symptoms: Performance summary shows most build time concentrated in a single project; diagnostic log shows idle nodes while one works
  • Common culprits: targets without proper dependency declaration, single project on critical path
  • Fixes: split large projects, optimize the critical path project, ensure proper
    BuildInParallel

4. Excessive File I/O (Copy tasks)

  • Symptoms: Copy task shows high aggregate time
  • Root causes: copying thousands of files, copying across network drives, Copy task unintentionally running once per item (per-file) instead of as a single batch (see dotnet/msbuild#12884)
  • Fixes: use hardlinks (
    <CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>true</CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>
    ), reduce CopyToOutputDirectory items, use
    <UseCommonOutputDirectory>true</UseCommonOutputDirectory>
    when appropriate, set
    <SkipCopyUnchangedFiles>true</SkipCopyUnchangedFiles>
    , consider
    --artifacts-path
    (.NET 8+) for centralized output layout
  • Dev Drive: On Windows, switching to a Dev Drive (ReFS with copy-on-write and reduced Defender scans) can significantly reduce file I/O overhead for Copy-heavy builds. Recommend for both dev machines and self-hosted CI agents.

5. Evaluation Overhead

  • Symptoms: build starts slow before any compilation
  • Root causes: complex Directory.Build.props, wildcard globs scanning large directories, NuGetSdkResolver overhead (adds 180-400ms per project evaluation even when restored — see dotnet/msbuild#4025)
  • Fixes: reduce Directory.Build.props complexity, use
    <EnableDefaultItems>false</EnableDefaultItems>
    for legacy projects with explicit file lists, avoid NuGet-based SDK resolvers if possible
  • See:
    eval-performance
    skill for detailed guidance

6. NuGet Restore in Build

  • Symptoms: restore runs every build even when unnecessary
  • Fixes:
    • Separate restore from build:
      dotnet restore
      then
      dotnet build --no-restore
    • Enable static graph evaluation:
      <RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation>true</RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation>
      in Directory.Build.props — can save significant time in large builds (results are workload-dependent)

7. Large Project Count and Graph Shape

  • Symptoms: many small projects, each takes minimal time but overhead adds up; deep dependency chains serialize the build
  • Consider: project consolidation, or use
    /graph
    mode for better scheduling
  • Graph shape matters: a wide dependency graph (few levels, many parallel branches) builds faster than a deep one (many levels, serialized). Refactoring from deep to wide can yield significant improvements in both clean and incremental build times.
  • Actions: look for unnecessary project dependencies, consider splitting a bottleneck project into two, or merging small leaf projects

Using Binlog Replay for Performance Analysis

Step-by-step workflow using text log replay:

  1. Replay with performance summary:
    dotnet msbuild build.binlog -noconlog -fl -flp:v=diag;logfile=full.log;performancesummary
    
  2. Read target/task performance summaries (at the end of
    full.log
    ):
    grep "Target Performance Summary\|Task Performance Summary" -A 50 full.log
    
    This shows all targets and tasks sorted by cumulative time — equivalent to finding expensive targets/tasks.
  3. Find per-project build times:
    grep "done building project\|Project Performance Summary" full.log
    
  4. Check parallelism (multi-node scheduling):
    grep -i "node.*assigned\|RequiresLeadingNewline\|Building with" full.log | head -30
    
  5. Check analyzer overhead:
    grep -i "Total analyzer execution time\|analyzer.*elapsed\|CompilerAnalyzerDriver" full.log
    
  6. Drill into a specific slow target:
    grep 'Target "CoreCompile"\|Target "ResolveAssemblyReferences"' full.log
    

Quick Wins Checklist

  • Use
    /maxcpucount
    (or
    -m
    ) for parallel builds
  • Separate restore from build (
    dotnet restore
    then
    dotnet build --no-restore
    )
  • Enable static graph restore (
    <RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation>true</RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation>
    )
  • Enable hardlinks for Copy (
    <CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>true</CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>
    )
  • Disable analyzers conditionally in dev inner loop:
    <RunAnalyzers Condition="'$(ContinuousIntegrationBuild)' != 'true'">false</RunAnalyzers>
  • Enable reference assemblies (
    <ProduceReferenceAssembly>true</ProduceReferenceAssembly>
    )
  • Check for broken incremental builds (see
    incremental-build
    skill)
  • Check for bin/obj clashes (see
    check-bin-obj-clash
    skill)
  • Use graph build (
    /graph
    ) for multi-project solutions
  • Use
    --artifacts-path
    (.NET 8+) for centralized output layout
  • Enable Dev Drive (ReFS) on Windows dev machines and self-hosted CI

Impact Categorization

When reporting findings, categorize by impact to help prioritize fixes:

  • 🔴 HIGH IMPACT (do first): Items consuming >10% of total build time, or a single target >50% of build time
  • 🟡 MEDIUM IMPACT: Items consuming 2-10% of build time
  • 🟢 QUICK WINS: Easy changes with modest impact (e.g., property flags in Directory.Build.props)