EasyPlatform greenfield

[Planning] Start a new project from scratch with full waterfall inception — idea, research, domain modeling, tech stack, and implementation plan

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/greenfield" ~/.claude/skills/duc01226-easyplatform-greenfield && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: .claude/skills/greenfield/SKILL.md
source content
<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->

Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:

  • Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal.
  • Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing.
  • Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain.
  • Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path.
  • When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site.
  • Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code.
  • Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks.
  • Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis.
  • Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly.
  • Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION use

TaskCreate
to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION use
AskUserQuestion
at EVERY stage — validate decisions before proceeding. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION NEVER ask tech stack upfront — business analysis and domain modeling first.

Quick Summary

Goal: Guide greenfield project inception from raw idea to an approved, implementable project plan using a full waterfall process.

Workflow (16 steps):

  1. Discovery (
    /idea
    ) — Interview user about problem, vision, constraints, team skills, scale. DO NOT ask about tech stack — keep business-focused.
  2. Market Research (
    /web-research
    ) — WebSearch for competitors, market landscape, existing solutions
  3. Deep Research (
    /deep-research
    ) — WebFetch top sources, extract key findings
  4. Business Evaluation (
    /business-evaluation
    ) — Viability assessment, risk matrix, value proposition
  5. Domain Analysis & ERD (
    /domain-analysis
    ) — Bounded contexts, aggregates, entities, ERD diagram, domain events. Validate every context boundary with user.
  6. Tech Stack Research (
    /tech-stack-research
    ) — Derive technical requirements from business + domain analysis. Research top 3 options per stack layer (backend, frontend, database, messaging, infra). Detailed pros/cons matrix, team-fit scoring, market analysis. Present comparison report for user to decide.
  7. Architecture Design (
    /architecture-design
    ) — Research and compare top 3 architecture styles (Clean, Hexagonal, Vertical Slice, etc.). Evaluate design patterns (CQRS, Repository, Mediator). Audit against SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI. Validate scalability, maintainability, IoC, technical agnosticism. Present comparison with recommendation.
  8. Implementation Plan (
    /plan
    ) — Create phased plan using confirmed tech stack + architecture + domain model
  9. Security Audit (
    /security
    ) — Review plan for OWASP Top 10, auth patterns, data protection concerns
  10. Performance Audit (
    /performance
    ) — Review plan for performance bottlenecks, scalability, query optimization
  11. Plan Review (
    /plan-review
    ) — Full plan review, risk assessment, approval
  12. Refine to PBI (
    /refine
    ) — Transform idea + reviewed plan into actionable PBI with acceptance criteria
  13. User Stories (
    /story
    ) — Break PBI into implementable user stories
  14. Plan Validation (
    /plan-validate
    ) — Interview user with critical questions to validate plan + stories
  15. Test Strategy (
    /tdd-spec
    ) — Test pyramid, frameworks, spec outline
  16. Workflow End (
    /workflow-end
    ) — Clean up, announce completion

Key Rules:

  • PLANNING ONLY: never implement code
  • Every stage saves artifacts to plan directory
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION every stage requires
    AskUserQuestion
    validation before proceeding
  • Delegate architecture decisions to
    solution-architect
    agent
  • Present 2-4 options for every major decision with confidence %
  • Business-First Protocol: Tech stack is NEVER asked upfront. Business analysis (steps 1-5) + domain modeling (step 6) must complete first. Tech stack is derived from requirements through research and presented as a comparison report with options.
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION architecture design and scaffold steps MUST ATTENTION include code quality gate tooling setup — linter, static analyzer, formatter, pre-commit hooks, CI quality gates, and build-time enforcement are NON-SKIPPABLE infrastructure.

Entry Point

This skill is the explicit entry point for the

greenfield-init
workflow.

When invoked:

  1. Activate the
    greenfield-init
    workflow via
    /workflow-start greenfield-init
  2. The workflow handles step sequencing, task creation, and progress tracking
  3. Each step delegates to the appropriate skill (idea, web-research, domain-analysis, tech-stack-research, etc.)
  4. The
    solution-architect
    agent provides architecture guidance throughout

When to Use

  • Starting a brand-new project from scratch
  • No existing codebase (empty project directory)
  • Planning a new application before writing any code
  • Want structured waterfall inception with user collaboration at every step

When NOT to Use

  • Existing codebase with code (use
    /plan
    or
    /feature
    instead)
  • Bug fixes, refactoring, or feature implementation
  • Quick prototyping (use
    /cook-fast
    instead)

Output

All artifacts saved to plan directory:

plans/{id}/
  research/
    discovery-interview.md
    market-research.md
    deep-research.md
    business-evaluation.md
    domain-analysis.md
    tech-stack-comparison.md
    architecture-design.md
  phase-01-domain-model.md
  phase-02-tech-stack.md
  phase-02b-architecture.md
  phase-03-project-structure.md
  phase-04-test-strategy.md
  phase-05-backlog.md
  plan.md (master plan with YAML frontmatter)

After completion, recommend next step:

/cook
to scaffold the project structure.

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).


MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks — one per workflow step. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION validate with user at EVERY step — never auto-decide. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements.


Closing Reminders

  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using
    TaskCreate
    BEFORE starting
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite
    file:line
    evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->
  • MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact. <!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->
  • MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction. <!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->