EasyPlatform handoff

[Process] Create structured handoff record between roles. Use when transitioning work between PO/BA/Dev/QA.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/handoff" ~/.claude/skills/duc01226-easyplatform-handoff && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: .claude/skills/handoff/SKILL.md
source content

[IMPORTANT] Use

TaskCreate
to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->

Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:

  • Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal.
  • Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing.
  • Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain.
  • Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path.
  • When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site.
  • Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code.
  • Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks.
  • Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis.
  • Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly.
  • Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention --> <!-- SYNC:understand-code-first -->

Understand Code First — HARD-GATE: Do NOT write, plan, or fix until you READ existing code.

  1. Search 3+ similar patterns (
    grep
    /
    glob
    ) — cite
    file:line
    evidence
  2. Read existing files in target area — understand structure, base classes, conventions
  3. Run
    python .claude/scripts/code_graph trace <file> --direction both --json
    when
    .code-graph/graph.db
    exists
  4. Map dependencies via
    connections
    or
    callers_of
    — know what depends on your target
  5. Write investigation to
    .ai/workspace/analysis/
    for non-trivial tasks (3+ files)
  6. Re-read analysis file before implementing — never work from memory alone
  7. NEVER invent new patterns when existing ones work — match exactly or document deviation

BLOCKED until:

- [ ]
Read target files
- [ ]
Grep 3+ patterns
- [ ]
Graph trace (if graph.db exists)
- [ ]
Assumptions verified with evidence

<!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first -->

Quick Summary

Goal: Create a structured handoff record documenting what's ready, what's outstanding, and context for the receiving role.

Workflow:

  1. Summarize — What was completed by the sending role
  2. Artifacts — List deliverables (PBI, stories, designs, code, tests)
  3. Outstanding — Known issues, open questions, risks
  4. Context — Key decisions made, rationale, assumptions
  5. Next Steps — What the receiving role should do first

Key Rules:

  • Handoff must include artifact references (file paths, PBI IDs)
  • Flag any blockers or dependencies
  • Include contact/escalation info if applicable

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Handoff Types

FromToKey Artifacts
PO → BAIdea, PBI draftProblem statement, business value, constraints
BA → DevRefined PBI, storiesAcceptance criteria, wireframes, dependencies
Dev → QACode, unit testsTest data, deployment steps, known limitations
QA → POTest resultsCoverage report, defect list, sign-off recommendation
Design → DevDesign specComponent inventory, tokens, states, interactions

Output Format

## Handoff Record

**From:** [Role]
**To:** [Role]
**Date:** {date}
**Feature/PBI:** [Reference]

### Completed Work
- [Item with artifact reference]

### Artifacts
| Artifact | Location | Status |
|----------|----------|--------|

### Outstanding Items
- [Open question/risk with owner]

### Context & Decisions
- [Key decision + rationale]

### Next Steps for [Receiving Role]
1. [First action]
2. [Second action]

### Blockers
- [Any blocking items]

IMPORTANT Task Planning Notes (MUST ATTENTION FOLLOW)

  • Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks using
    TaskCreate
  • Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements

Workflow Recommendation

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — NO EXCEPTIONS: If you are NOT already in a workflow, you MUST ATTENTION use

AskUserQuestion
to ask the user. Do NOT judge task complexity or decide this is "simple enough to skip" — the user decides whether to use a workflow, not you:

  1. Activate
    dev-qa-handoff
    workflow
    (Recommended) — handoff → test-spec
  2. Execute
    /handoff
    directly
    — run this skill standalone

Closing Reminders

  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using
    TaskCreate
    BEFORE starting
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite
    file:line
    evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ the following files before starting: <!-- SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder -->
  • MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search 3+ existing patterns and read code BEFORE any modification. Run graph trace when graph.db exists. <!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->
  • MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact. <!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->
  • MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction. <!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->