EasyPlatform handoff
[Process] Create structured handoff record between roles. Use when transitioning work between PO/BA/Dev/QA.
git clone https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/handoff" ~/.claude/skills/duc01226-easyplatform-handoff && rm -rf "$T"
.claude/skills/handoff/SKILL.md<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->[IMPORTANT] Use
to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.TaskCreate
<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention --> <!-- SYNC:understand-code-first -->AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:
- Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal.
- Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing.
- Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain.
- Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path.
- When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site.
- Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code.
- Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks.
- Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis.
- Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly.
- Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
<!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first -->Understand Code First — HARD-GATE: Do NOT write, plan, or fix until you READ existing code.
- Search 3+ similar patterns (
/grep) — citeglobevidencefile:line- Read existing files in target area — understand structure, base classes, conventions
- Run
whenpython .claude/scripts/code_graph trace <file> --direction both --jsonexists.code-graph/graph.db- Map dependencies via
orconnections— know what depends on your targetcallers_of- Write investigation to
for non-trivial tasks (3+ files).ai/workspace/analysis/- Re-read analysis file before implementing — never work from memory alone
- NEVER invent new patterns when existing ones work — match exactly or document deviation
BLOCKED until:
Read target files- [ ]Grep 3+ patterns- [ ]Graph trace (if graph.db exists)- [ ]Assumptions verified with evidence- [ ]
Quick Summary
Goal: Create a structured handoff record documenting what's ready, what's outstanding, and context for the receiving role.
Workflow:
- Summarize — What was completed by the sending role
- Artifacts — List deliverables (PBI, stories, designs, code, tests)
- Outstanding — Known issues, open questions, risks
- Context — Key decisions made, rationale, assumptions
- Next Steps — What the receiving role should do first
Key Rules:
- Handoff must include artifact references (file paths, PBI IDs)
- Flag any blockers or dependencies
- Include contact/escalation info if applicable
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
Handoff Types
| From | To | Key Artifacts |
|---|---|---|
| PO → BA | Idea, PBI draft | Problem statement, business value, constraints |
| BA → Dev | Refined PBI, stories | Acceptance criteria, wireframes, dependencies |
| Dev → QA | Code, unit tests | Test data, deployment steps, known limitations |
| QA → PO | Test results | Coverage report, defect list, sign-off recommendation |
| Design → Dev | Design spec | Component inventory, tokens, states, interactions |
Output Format
## Handoff Record **From:** [Role] **To:** [Role] **Date:** {date} **Feature/PBI:** [Reference] ### Completed Work - [Item with artifact reference] ### Artifacts | Artifact | Location | Status | |----------|----------|--------| ### Outstanding Items - [Open question/risk with owner] ### Context & Decisions - [Key decision + rationale] ### Next Steps for [Receiving Role] 1. [First action] 2. [Second action] ### Blockers - [Any blocking items]
IMPORTANT Task Planning Notes (MUST ATTENTION FOLLOW)
- Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks using
TaskCreate - Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements
Workflow Recommendation
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — NO EXCEPTIONS: If you are NOT already in a workflow, you MUST ATTENTION use
to ask the user. Do NOT judge task complexity or decide this is "simple enough to skip" — the user decides whether to use a workflow, not you:AskUserQuestion
- Activate
workflow (Recommended) — handoff → test-specdev-qa-handoff- Execute
directly — run this skill standalone/handoff
Closing Reminders
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using
BEFORE startingTaskCreate - MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite
evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)file:line - MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ the following files before starting: <!-- SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder -->
- MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search 3+ existing patterns and read code BEFORE any modification. Run graph trace when graph.db exists. <!-- /SYNC:understand-code-first:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->
- MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact. <!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->
- MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction. <!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->