EasyPlatform recover

[Utilities] Restore workflow context from checkpoint after session loss

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/recover" ~/.claude/skills/duc01226-easyplatform-recover && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: .claude/skills/recover/SKILL.md
source content

[IMPORTANT] Use

TaskCreate
to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->

Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:

  • Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal.
  • Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing.
  • Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain.
  • Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path.
  • When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site.
  • Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code.
  • Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks.
  • Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis.
  • Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly.
  • Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

Quick Summary

Goal: Restore workflow state and todo items from checkpoint files after context loss or session interruption.

Workflow:

  1. Find Checkpoint — Locate latest
    memory-checkpoint-*.md
    in reports directory
  2. Read Metadata — Extract JSON block with session ID, active plan, current step, pending todos
  3. Restore Todos — Immediately call TaskCreate with pending items from checkpoint
  4. Resume Workflow — Continue from the interrupted step using restored context

Key Rules:

  • Always restore TaskCreate items before resuming any work
  • Check both
    plans/reports/
    and plan-specific report directories
  • Use timestamp to find the checkpoint closest to the interruption

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Recover Workflow Context

Restore workflow state and todo items from checkpoint files after context compaction or session loss.

Usage

Use this command when:

  • Context was compacted and you've lost track of the workflow
  • Session was interrupted and needs to resume
  • Todo items need to be restored from a checkpoint
  • The automatic recovery didn't trigger

Recovery Process

Step 1: Find Latest Checkpoint

Look for checkpoint files in the reports directory:

ls -la plans/reports/memory-checkpoint-*.md | tail -5

Or search for all recent checkpoints:

find plans -name "memory-checkpoint-*.md" -mmin -60 | head -5

Step 2: Read Checkpoint File

Read the most recent checkpoint to understand the saved state:

Read the checkpoint file at: plans/reports/memory-checkpoint-YYMMDD-HHMMSS.md

Step 3: Extract Recovery Metadata

The checkpoint file contains a JSON metadata block at the end:

{
  "sessionId": "...",
  "activePlan": "plans/YYMMDD-slug/",
  "workflowType": "feature",
  "currentStep": "cook",
  "remainingSteps": ["test", "code-review"],
  "pendingTodos": [...]
}

Step 4: Restore Todo Items

IMMEDIATELY call TaskCreate with the pending todos from the checkpoint:

[
    { "content": "[Workflow] /cook - Implement", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing /cook" },
    { "content": "[Workflow] /test - Run tests", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing /test" },
    { "content": "[Workflow] /code-review - Review code", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing /code-review" }
]

Step 5: Read Active Plan (if exists)

If

activePlan
is set in the metadata, read the plan file:

Read: {activePlan}/plan.md

Step 6: Continue Workflow

Resume from the

currentStep
identified in the metadata. Execute the remaining workflow steps in order.

Recovery Checklist

  • Located most recent checkpoint file
  • Read checkpoint content
  • Extracted recovery metadata JSON
  • Restored todo items via TaskCreate
  • Read active plan (if applicable)
  • Identified current workflow step
  • Ready to continue from interrupted step

Automatic vs Manual Recovery

ScenarioRecovery TypeTrigger
Session resume after compactAutomatic
post-compact-recovery.cjs
hook
New session in same directoryManualThis
/recover
command
Explicit user requestManualThis
/recover
command
No workflow state foundManualThis
/recover
command

Checkpoint Locations

Checkpoints are saved to different locations based on context:

  1. Active plan exists:
    {plan-path}/reports/memory-checkpoint-*.md
  2. No active plan:
    plans/reports/memory-checkpoint-*.md

Tips

  1. Check multiple locations - Plans may have their own reports directories
  2. Use timestamp - Checkpoints are timestamped, find the one closest to when you were working
  3. Verify todo status - Compare checkpoint todos with current TaskCreate state
  4. Read incrementally - Don't try to restore everything at once

Related Commands

  • /checkpoint
    - Create a manual checkpoint (before expected loss)
  • /compact
    - Manually trigger context compaction
  • /context
    - Load project context
  • /watzup
    - Generate progress summary

Example Recovery Flow

User: /recover

Claude: Let me find and restore your workflow context.

1. Finding latest checkpoint...
   Found: plans/reports/memory-checkpoint-260110-143025.md

2. Reading checkpoint metadata...
   - Workflow: feature
   - Current step: /cook
   - Remaining: /test, /code-review
   - Active plan: plans/260110-1430-new-feature/

3. Restoring TaskCreate items...
   [Calling TaskCreate with 3 pending items]

4. Reading active plan...
   [Reading plans/260110-1430-new-feature/plan.md]

5. Ready to continue from /cook step.
   Shall I proceed with the implementation?

Closing Reminders

  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using
    TaskCreate
    BEFORE starting
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite
    file:line
    evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->
  • MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact. <!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->
  • MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction. <!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->