AutoSkill Exposure Hot Spot Identification Protocol
A therapist micro-skill to identify, label, and flag high-arousal moments ('hot spots') within a trauma narrative during imaginal exposure for later targeted processing.
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/SkillBank/DocSkill/心理咨询/Family技能/行为主义/微技能/Exposure Hot Spot Identification Protocol" ~/.claude/skills/ecnu-icalk-autoskill-exposure-hot-spot-identification-protocol && rm -rf "$T"
SkillBank/DocSkill/心理咨询/Family技能/行为主义/微技能/Exposure Hot Spot Identification Protocol/SKILL.mdExposure Hot Spot Identification Protocol
A therapist micro-skill to identify, label, and flag high-arousal moments ('hot spots') within a trauma narrative during imaginal exposure for later targeted processing.
Prompt
While conducting imaginal exposure, observe for three objective behavioral/physiological markers: (1) unprovoked pause >5 seconds, (2) acute somatic response (e.g., sweating, tearfulness, voice breaking), or (3) SUDS spike ≥30 points within one narrative clause. When any occurs, silently note the exact phrase or timestamp in session notes as a hot spot (e.g., 'truck hits left door — son’s seat'). Only name it aloud if client is stable and ready for meta-cognitive reflection; otherwise, withhold labeling to preserve exposure flow.
Objective
Systematically detect and document narrative segments that elicit disproportionate distress or physiological reactivity to prioritize in subsequent sessions.
Applicable Signals
- unprompted pause >5 sec
- sweating/tearfulness/voice break
- SUDS Δ ≥30 in one clause
Contraindications
- Client is narrating calmly with stable SUDS
- Therapist has not yet established baseline SUDS anchors
- Client explicitly resists labeling or revisiting parts of memory
Intervention Moves
- silent timestamp/phrase notation
- optional verbal naming only if client shows readiness for meta-cognition
Workflow Steps
- Observe for ≥1 applicable signal during exposure
- Confirm signal is not prompted by therapist interruption
- Record precise narrative phrase or timestamp as hot spot in notes
- Withhold verbal labeling unless client demonstrates cognitive stability and openness
Constraints
- Must occur during active imaginal exposure
- Requires pre-established SUDS scale anchoring
- No interpretation or reframing permitted at this step
Cautions
- Do not interrupt exposure flow to label; delay naming until natural pause or post-exposure debrief
- Avoid premature meta-cognitive framing if client is still in state-dependent arousal
Output Contract
- A timestamped or verbatim-quoted hot spot annotation in session notes (e.g., 'truck hits back left door — son’s seat'), with optional real-time verbal naming only if client is cognitively accessible and consents to reflection.
Example Therapist Responses
Example 1
- Client/Input: Client pauses 8 seconds after saying 'The truck hits us on the back left side door...'
- Therapist/Output: Therapist notes in chart: 'Hot spot: "truck hits back left door — son’s seat"', no verbal comment
- Notes: Pause exceeds 5 sec; somatic signs present (sweating, tearful); SUDS rose from 100→70 mid-pause — qualifies as hot spot.
Example 2
- Client/Input: Client says 'My son was sitting there' and begins sobbing uncontrollably, SUDS jumps from 60 to 95
- Therapist/Output: Therapist writes: 'Hot spot: "son was sitting there"', then says gently: 'That part came up strongly — we’ll come back to it.'
- Notes: SUDS Δ = 35; acute somatic response; therapist names only briefly and future-oriented to avoid re-traumatizing.
Objective
Systematically detect and document narrative segments that elicit disproportionate distress or physiological reactivity to prioritize in subsequent sessions.
Applicable Signals
- unprompted pause >5 sec
- sweating/tearfulness/voice break
- SUDS Δ ≥30 in one clause
Contraindications
- Client is narrating calmly with stable SUDS
- Therapist has not yet established baseline SUDS anchors
- Client explicitly resists labeling or revisiting parts of memory
Intervention Moves
- silent timestamp/phrase notation
- optional verbal naming only if client shows readiness for meta-cognition
Workflow Steps
- Observe for ≥1 applicable signal during exposure
- Confirm signal is not prompted by therapist interruption
- Record precise narrative phrase or timestamp as hot spot in notes
- Withhold verbal labeling unless client demonstrates cognitive stability and openness
Constraints
- Must occur during active imaginal exposure
- Requires pre-established SUDS scale anchoring
- No interpretation or reframing permitted at this step
Cautions
- Do not interrupt exposure flow to label; delay naming until natural pause or post-exposure debrief
- Avoid premature meta-cognitive framing if client is still in state-dependent arousal
Output Contract
- A timestamped or verbatim-quoted hot spot annotation in session notes (e.g., 'truck hits back left door — son’s seat'), with optional real-time verbal naming only if client is cognitively accessible and consents to reflection.
Example Therapist Responses
Example 1
- Client/Input: Client pauses 8 seconds after saying 'The truck hits us on the back left side door...'
- Therapist/Output: Therapist notes in chart: 'Hot spot: "truck hits back left door — son’s seat"', no verbal comment
- Notes: Pause exceeds 5 sec; somatic signs present (sweating, tearful); SUDS rose from 100→70 mid-pause — qualifies as hot spot.
Example 2
- Client/Input: Client says 'My son was sitting there' and begins sobbing uncontrollably, SUDS jumps from 60 to 95
- Therapist/Output: Therapist writes: 'Hot spot: "son was sitting there"', then says gently: 'That part came up strongly — we’ll come back to it.'
- Notes: SUDS Δ = 35; acute somatic response; therapist names only briefly and future-oriented to avoid re-traumatizing.
Files
references/evidence.mdreferences/evidence_manifest.json
Triggers
- Client pauses unusually long (>5 sec) during memory narration
- Client displays acute somatic response (sweating, tearfulness, voice breaking) without prompting
- SUDS spikes ≥30 points within one narrative clause
Examples
Example 1
Input:
Client pauses 8 seconds after saying 'The truck hits us on the back left side door...'
Output:
Therapist notes in chart: 'Hot spot: "truck hits back left door — son’s seat"', no verbal comment
Notes:
Pause exceeds 5 sec; somatic signs present (sweating, tearful); SUDS rose from 100→70 mid-pause — qualifies as hot spot.
Example 2
Input:
Client says 'My son was sitting there' and begins sobbing uncontrollably, SUDS jumps from 60 to 95
Output:
Therapist writes: 'Hot spot: "son was sitting there"', then says gently: 'That part came up strongly — we’ll come back to it.'
Notes:
SUDS Δ = 35; acute somatic response; therapist names only briefly and future-oriented to avoid re-traumatizing.