RET自助表填写与反馈修正

指导求助者填写RET自助表（事件A、信念B、结果C），并在下一次咨询中检查、讨论并修正其不合理信念B的表述。该技能 supports CBT框架内的认知重构。

Prompt

1. 确认求助者已理解ABC模型基本结构；2. 提供标准化RET自助表模板（含A/B/C三栏）；3. 引导求助者用具体、可观察的语言填写A（事件）和C（情绪/行为结果）；4. 聚焦识别B中绝对化（必须/应该）、以偏概全（总是/从不）、灾难化等非理性特征；5. 下次咨询时逐项核对，用苏格拉底式提问澄清模糊表述，协助将‘我必须考第一’修正为‘我希望考好，但成绩不定义我的价值’等更弹性表述。

Objective

facilitate identification and revision of irrational beliefs using structured self-report

Applicable Signals

• client verbalizes awareness of own thinking patterns
• client completes written reflection without significant avoidance or blank responses
• client uses absolutist language (e.g., 'must', 'should', 'always') when describing expectations

Contraindications

• client lacks literacy or cognitive capacity for written self-report
• acute crisis or severe depression impairs reflective capacity
• no prior introduction to RET or ABC theory

Intervention Moves

• content_reaction_on_B
• socratic_questioning_on_belief_elasticity
• reframing_absolutist_language
• collaborative_belief_reformulation

Workflow Steps

• 1. Introduce RET自助表 purpose and structure
• 2. Model one A-B-C example with non-clinical content
• 3. Assign as between-session task with clear deadline
• 4. At next session: review each column, validate effort, then focus revision on B
• 5. Co-construct revised B-statement that preserves intent but reduces rigidity

Constraints

• Must not proceed without confirmed ABC conceptual understanding
• B-column entries must be verbatim client language before revision
• No interpretation or labeling of beliefs by therapist prior to client's own articulation

Cautions

• Avoid correcting B too quickly—prioritize client's ownership of insight
• If multiple B-statements appear, select only 1–2 highest-impact ones for revision per session
• Do not accept vague B (e.g., 'I think bad things') without prompting for specificity

Output Contract

• Completed RET自助表 with at least one clearly articulated irrational belief (e.g., 'I must get top grades') and therapist-verified correction of its absolutist language into a flexible, preference-based alternative.

Example Therapist Responses

Example 1

• Client/Input: 求助者填写：A=期末考试前夜失眠；C=心慌、复习中断；B=我必须考第一，否则就完了。
• Therapist/Output: 修订后B：'我非常希望考出好成绩，但即使没达到目标，也不代表我失败或没有价值。'
• Notes: 聚焦将'必须'转为'希望'，'否则就完了'解构为'后果可承受且非终极'

Objective

facilitate identification and revision of irrational beliefs using structured self-report

Applicable Signals

• client verbalizes awareness of own thinking patterns
• client completes written reflection without significant avoidance or blank responses
• client uses absolutist language (e.g., 'must', 'should', 'always') when describing expectations

Contraindications

• client lacks literacy or cognitive capacity for written self-report
• acute crisis or severe depression impairs reflective capacity
• no prior introduction to RET or ABC theory

Intervention Moves

• content_reaction_on_B
• socratic_questioning_on_belief_elasticity
• reframing_absolutist_language
• collaborative_belief_reformulation

Workflow Steps

• 1. Introduce RET自助表 purpose and structure
• 2. Model one A-B-C example with non-clinical content
• 3. Assign as between-session task with clear deadline
• 4. At next session: review each column, validate effort, then focus revision on B
• 5. Co-construct revised B-statement that preserves intent but reduces rigidity

Constraints

• Must not proceed without confirmed ABC conceptual understanding
• B-column entries must be verbatim client language before revision
• No interpretation or labeling of beliefs by therapist prior to client's own articulation

Cautions

• Avoid correcting B too quickly—prioritize client's ownership of insight
• If multiple B-statements appear, select only 1–2 highest-impact ones for revision per session
• Do not accept vague B (e.g., 'I think bad things') without prompting for specificity

Output Contract

• Completed RET自助表 with at least one clearly articulated irrational belief (e.g., 'I must get top grades') and therapist-verified correction of its absolutist language into a flexible, preference-based alternative.

Example Therapist Responses

Example 1

• Client/Input: 求助者填写：A=期末考试前夜失眠；C=心慌、复习中断；B=我必须考第一，否则就完了。
• Therapist/Output: 修订后B：'我非常希望考出好成绩，但即使没达到目标，也不代表我失败或没有价值。'
• Notes: 聚焦将'必须'转为'希望'，'否则就完了'解构为'后果可承受且非终极'

子技能目录

• [Socratic Debate on Irrational Beliefs](心理咨询/Family技能/人本-存在主义/微技能/Socratic Debate on Irrational Beliefs/SKILL.md) ｜ 适用：Use guided questioning to challenge absolutist and overgeneralized beliefs (e.g., 'must', 'should', 'always', 'never'), helping client detect logical flaws, empirical inconsistencies, and functional consequences of their beliefs.

选用规则（微技能目录）

• 当目标、阶段或方法更接近

  Socratic Debate on Irrational Beliefs

  时，优先调用它。 线索：client has identified a specific irrational belief in RET table, client expresses openness to examining belief validity, therapist observes emotional activation linked to belief, CBT, RET

Files

• references/children_manifest.json

• references/children_map.md

• references/evidence.md

• references/evidence_manifest.json

Triggers

• client has completed prior psychoeducation on ABC model
• client shows readiness to self-reflect on beliefs
• session is in middle phase of CBT protocol

Examples

Example 1

Input:

求助者填写：A=期末考试前夜失眠；C=心慌、复习中断；B=我必须考第一，否则就完了。

Output:

修订后B：'我非常希望考出好成绩，但即使没达到目标，也不代表我失败或没有价值。'

Notes:

聚焦将'必须'转为'希望'，'否则就完了'解构为'后果可承受且非终极'